Accuracy, precision and robustness of different methods to obtain samples from silages in fermentation studies.

The objective of this study was to evaluate accuracy, precision and robustness of two methods to obtain silage samples, in comparison with extraction of liquor by manual screw-press. Wet brewery residue alone or combined with soybean hulls and citrus pulp were ensiled in laboratory silos. Liquor was extracted by a manual screw-press and a 2-mL aliquot was fixed with 0.4 mL formic acid. Two 10-g silage samples from each silo were diluted in 20 mL deionized water or 17% formic acid solution (alternative methods). Aliquots obtained by the three methods were used to determine the silage contents of fermentation end-products. The accuracy of the alternative methods was evaluated by comparing mean bias of estimates obtained by manual screw-press and by alternative methods, whereas precision was assessed by the root mean square prediction error and the residual error. Robustness was determined by studying the interaction between bias and chemical components, pH, in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and buffer capacity. The 17% formic acid method was more accurate for estimating acetic, butyric and lactic acids, although it resulted in low overestimates of propionic acid and underestimates of ethanol. The deionized water method overestimated acetic and propionic acids and slightly underestimated ethanol. The 17% formic acid method was more precise than deionized water for estimating all organic acids and ethanol. The robustness of each method with respect to variation in the silage chemical composition, IVDMD and pH is dependent on the fermentation end-product at evaluation. The robustness of the alternative methods seems to be critical at the determination of lactic acid and ethanol contents.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: GOMES, R. da C., MEYER, P. M., CASTRO, A. L. de, NETTO, A. S., RODRIGUES, P. H. M.
Other Authors: RODRIGO DA COSTA GOMES, CNPGC; Paula Marques Meyer, IBGE; Ari Luiz de Castro, Departamento de Nutrição e Produção Animal, FMVZ/USP.; Arlindo Saran Netto, Departamento de Zootecnia, FZEA/USP; Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues, Departamento de Nutrição e Produção Animal, FMVZ/USP.
Format: Separatas biblioteca
Language:English
eng
Published: 2013-03-07
Subjects:Silagem.,
Online Access:http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/952505
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id dig-alice-doc-952505
record_format koha
spelling dig-alice-doc-9525052017-08-15T21:27:23Z Accuracy, precision and robustness of different methods to obtain samples from silages in fermentation studies. GOMES, R. da C. MEYER, P. M. CASTRO, A. L. de NETTO, A. S. RODRIGUES, P. H. M. RODRIGO DA COSTA GOMES, CNPGC; Paula Marques Meyer, IBGE; Ari Luiz de Castro, Departamento de Nutrição e Produção Animal, FMVZ/USP.; Arlindo Saran Netto, Departamento de Zootecnia, FZEA/USP; Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues, Departamento de Nutrição e Produção Animal, FMVZ/USP. Silagem. The objective of this study was to evaluate accuracy, precision and robustness of two methods to obtain silage samples, in comparison with extraction of liquor by manual screw-press. Wet brewery residue alone or combined with soybean hulls and citrus pulp were ensiled in laboratory silos. Liquor was extracted by a manual screw-press and a 2-mL aliquot was fixed with 0.4 mL formic acid. Two 10-g silage samples from each silo were diluted in 20 mL deionized water or 17% formic acid solution (alternative methods). Aliquots obtained by the three methods were used to determine the silage contents of fermentation end-products. The accuracy of the alternative methods was evaluated by comparing mean bias of estimates obtained by manual screw-press and by alternative methods, whereas precision was assessed by the root mean square prediction error and the residual error. Robustness was determined by studying the interaction between bias and chemical components, pH, in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and buffer capacity. The 17% formic acid method was more accurate for estimating acetic, butyric and lactic acids, although it resulted in low overestimates of propionic acid and underestimates of ethanol. The deionized water method overestimated acetic and propionic acids and slightly underestimated ethanol. The 17% formic acid method was more precise than deionized water for estimating all organic acids and ethanol. The robustness of each method with respect to variation in the silage chemical composition, IVDMD and pH is dependent on the fermentation end-product at evaluation. The robustness of the alternative methods seems to be critical at the determination of lactic acid and ethanol contents. 2013-03-07T11:11:11Z 2013-03-07T11:11:11Z 2013-03-07 2012 2013-03-07T11:11:11Z Separatas Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v.41, n.6, p.1369-1377, 2012. http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/952505 en eng openAccess
institution EMBRAPA
collection DSpace
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-alice
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Sistema de bibliotecas de EMBRAPA
language English
eng
topic Silagem.
Silagem.
spellingShingle Silagem.
Silagem.
GOMES, R. da C.
MEYER, P. M.
CASTRO, A. L. de
NETTO, A. S.
RODRIGUES, P. H. M.
Accuracy, precision and robustness of different methods to obtain samples from silages in fermentation studies.
description The objective of this study was to evaluate accuracy, precision and robustness of two methods to obtain silage samples, in comparison with extraction of liquor by manual screw-press. Wet brewery residue alone or combined with soybean hulls and citrus pulp were ensiled in laboratory silos. Liquor was extracted by a manual screw-press and a 2-mL aliquot was fixed with 0.4 mL formic acid. Two 10-g silage samples from each silo were diluted in 20 mL deionized water or 17% formic acid solution (alternative methods). Aliquots obtained by the three methods were used to determine the silage contents of fermentation end-products. The accuracy of the alternative methods was evaluated by comparing mean bias of estimates obtained by manual screw-press and by alternative methods, whereas precision was assessed by the root mean square prediction error and the residual error. Robustness was determined by studying the interaction between bias and chemical components, pH, in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and buffer capacity. The 17% formic acid method was more accurate for estimating acetic, butyric and lactic acids, although it resulted in low overestimates of propionic acid and underestimates of ethanol. The deionized water method overestimated acetic and propionic acids and slightly underestimated ethanol. The 17% formic acid method was more precise than deionized water for estimating all organic acids and ethanol. The robustness of each method with respect to variation in the silage chemical composition, IVDMD and pH is dependent on the fermentation end-product at evaluation. The robustness of the alternative methods seems to be critical at the determination of lactic acid and ethanol contents.
author2 RODRIGO DA COSTA GOMES, CNPGC; Paula Marques Meyer, IBGE; Ari Luiz de Castro, Departamento de Nutrição e Produção Animal, FMVZ/USP.; Arlindo Saran Netto, Departamento de Zootecnia, FZEA/USP; Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues, Departamento de Nutrição e Produção Animal, FMVZ/USP.
author_facet RODRIGO DA COSTA GOMES, CNPGC; Paula Marques Meyer, IBGE; Ari Luiz de Castro, Departamento de Nutrição e Produção Animal, FMVZ/USP.; Arlindo Saran Netto, Departamento de Zootecnia, FZEA/USP; Paulo Henrique Mazza Rodrigues, Departamento de Nutrição e Produção Animal, FMVZ/USP.
GOMES, R. da C.
MEYER, P. M.
CASTRO, A. L. de
NETTO, A. S.
RODRIGUES, P. H. M.
format Separatas
topic_facet Silagem.
author GOMES, R. da C.
MEYER, P. M.
CASTRO, A. L. de
NETTO, A. S.
RODRIGUES, P. H. M.
author_sort GOMES, R. da C.
title Accuracy, precision and robustness of different methods to obtain samples from silages in fermentation studies.
title_short Accuracy, precision and robustness of different methods to obtain samples from silages in fermentation studies.
title_full Accuracy, precision and robustness of different methods to obtain samples from silages in fermentation studies.
title_fullStr Accuracy, precision and robustness of different methods to obtain samples from silages in fermentation studies.
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy, precision and robustness of different methods to obtain samples from silages in fermentation studies.
title_sort accuracy, precision and robustness of different methods to obtain samples from silages in fermentation studies.
publishDate 2013-03-07
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/952505
work_keys_str_mv AT gomesrdac accuracyprecisionandrobustnessofdifferentmethodstoobtainsamplesfromsilagesinfermentationstudies
AT meyerpm accuracyprecisionandrobustnessofdifferentmethodstoobtainsamplesfromsilagesinfermentationstudies
AT castroalde accuracyprecisionandrobustnessofdifferentmethodstoobtainsamplesfromsilagesinfermentationstudies
AT nettoas accuracyprecisionandrobustnessofdifferentmethodstoobtainsamplesfromsilagesinfermentationstudies
AT rodriguesphm accuracyprecisionandrobustnessofdifferentmethodstoobtainsamplesfromsilagesinfermentationstudies
_version_ 1756018166988800000