Can the state take agroecology to scale? Public policy experiences in agroecological territorialization from Latin American

In this article we use a food sovereignty frame to analyze the role of the State in favoring agroecological scaling, particularly in Cuba and in the Latin American countries that elected leftist governments in the first years of the 21st century and currently face an upsurge of right-wing political forces. As with social movement participation in international governance structures, at the national level social movements face risks when they allow themselves to become absorbed in collaborations with the State in order to build public policy for taking agroecology to scale. By participating in the institutionalization of agroecology, movements become part of the established rules of the game, having to move within limits defined by a system that exists to preserve the interests of the dominant class. On the other hand, by boycotting the arena of governance, agroecological movements allow resurgent political and economic elites to grab land, territories and resources needed for agroecological food systems to ever become a global substitute for industrial agriculture. At the heart of the matter is the political character of agroecology: shall we continue betting on reform, in times of (counter) revolution?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giraldo Palacio, Omar Felipe Doctor autor 12320, McCune, Nils Max autor 12657
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Subjects:Soberanía alimentaria, Escalamiento agroecológico, Territorio, Política pública, Movimientos sociales,
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21683565.2019.1585402
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-ECOSUR:27532
record_format koha
spelling KOHA-OAI-ECOSUR:275322024-03-11T15:26:48ZCan the state take agroecology to scale? Public policy experiences in agroecological territorialization from Latin American Giraldo Palacio, Omar Felipe Doctor autor 12320 McCune, Nils Max autor 12657 textengIn this article we use a food sovereignty frame to analyze the role of the State in favoring agroecological scaling, particularly in Cuba and in the Latin American countries that elected leftist governments in the first years of the 21st century and currently face an upsurge of right-wing political forces. As with social movement participation in international governance structures, at the national level social movements face risks when they allow themselves to become absorbed in collaborations with the State in order to build public policy for taking agroecology to scale. By participating in the institutionalization of agroecology, movements become part of the established rules of the game, having to move within limits defined by a system that exists to preserve the interests of the dominant class. On the other hand, by boycotting the arena of governance, agroecological movements allow resurgent political and economic elites to grab land, territories and resources needed for agroecological food systems to ever become a global substitute for industrial agriculture. At the heart of the matter is the political character of agroecology: shall we continue betting on reform, in times of (counter) revolution?In this article we use a food sovereignty frame to analyze the role of the State in favoring agroecological scaling, particularly in Cuba and in the Latin American countries that elected leftist governments in the first years of the 21st century and currently face an upsurge of right-wing political forces. As with social movement participation in international governance structures, at the national level social movements face risks when they allow themselves to become absorbed in collaborations with the State in order to build public policy for taking agroecology to scale. By participating in the institutionalization of agroecology, movements become part of the established rules of the game, having to move within limits defined by a system that exists to preserve the interests of the dominant class. On the other hand, by boycotting the arena of governance, agroecological movements allow resurgent political and economic elites to grab land, territories and resources needed for agroecological food systems to ever become a global substitute for industrial agriculture. At the heart of the matter is the political character of agroecology: shall we continue betting on reform, in times of (counter) revolution?Adobe Acrobat profesional 6.0 o superiorSoberanía alimentariaEscalamiento agroecológicoTerritorioPolítica públicaMovimientos socialesDisponible en líneaAgroecology and Sustainable Food Systemshttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21683565.2019.1585402Disponible para usuarios de ECOSUR con su clave de acceso
institution ECOSUR
collection Koha
country México
countrycode MX
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-ecosur
tag biblioteca
region America del Norte
libraryname Sistema de Información Bibliotecario de ECOSUR (SIBE)
language eng
topic Soberanía alimentaria
Escalamiento agroecológico
Territorio
Política pública
Movimientos sociales
Soberanía alimentaria
Escalamiento agroecológico
Territorio
Política pública
Movimientos sociales
spellingShingle Soberanía alimentaria
Escalamiento agroecológico
Territorio
Política pública
Movimientos sociales
Soberanía alimentaria
Escalamiento agroecológico
Territorio
Política pública
Movimientos sociales
Giraldo Palacio, Omar Felipe Doctor autor 12320
McCune, Nils Max autor 12657
Can the state take agroecology to scale? Public policy experiences in agroecological territorialization from Latin American
description In this article we use a food sovereignty frame to analyze the role of the State in favoring agroecological scaling, particularly in Cuba and in the Latin American countries that elected leftist governments in the first years of the 21st century and currently face an upsurge of right-wing political forces. As with social movement participation in international governance structures, at the national level social movements face risks when they allow themselves to become absorbed in collaborations with the State in order to build public policy for taking agroecology to scale. By participating in the institutionalization of agroecology, movements become part of the established rules of the game, having to move within limits defined by a system that exists to preserve the interests of the dominant class. On the other hand, by boycotting the arena of governance, agroecological movements allow resurgent political and economic elites to grab land, territories and resources needed for agroecological food systems to ever become a global substitute for industrial agriculture. At the heart of the matter is the political character of agroecology: shall we continue betting on reform, in times of (counter) revolution?
format Texto
topic_facet Soberanía alimentaria
Escalamiento agroecológico
Territorio
Política pública
Movimientos sociales
author Giraldo Palacio, Omar Felipe Doctor autor 12320
McCune, Nils Max autor 12657
author_facet Giraldo Palacio, Omar Felipe Doctor autor 12320
McCune, Nils Max autor 12657
author_sort Giraldo Palacio, Omar Felipe Doctor autor 12320
title Can the state take agroecology to scale? Public policy experiences in agroecological territorialization from Latin American
title_short Can the state take agroecology to scale? Public policy experiences in agroecological territorialization from Latin American
title_full Can the state take agroecology to scale? Public policy experiences in agroecological territorialization from Latin American
title_fullStr Can the state take agroecology to scale? Public policy experiences in agroecological territorialization from Latin American
title_full_unstemmed Can the state take agroecology to scale? Public policy experiences in agroecological territorialization from Latin American
title_sort can the state take agroecology to scale? public policy experiences in agroecological territorialization from latin american
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21683565.2019.1585402
work_keys_str_mv AT giraldopalacioomarfelipedoctorautor12320 canthestatetakeagroecologytoscalepublicpolicyexperiencesinagroecologicalterritorializationfromlatinamerican
AT mccunenilsmaxautor12657 canthestatetakeagroecologytoscalepublicpolicyexperiencesinagroecologicalterritorializationfromlatinamerican
_version_ 1794790464420839424