Do Coffee Agroforestry Systems Always Improve Soil Carbon Stocks Deeper in the Soil?—A Case Study from Turrialba, Costa Rica

Shaded perennial agroforestry systems (AFS) are regarded as desirable land-use practices that improve soil carbon sequestration. However, most studies assume a positive correlation between above ground and below ground carbon without considering the effect of past and current land management, textural variations (silt and clay percentage), and such other site-specific factors that have a major influence on the extent of soil C sequestration. We assessed SOC stock at various depths (0–10, 10–30, 30–60, and 60–100 cm) in shaded perennial coffee (Coffea arabica L.) AFS in a 17-year-old experimental field at theCentro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, (9◦5304400 N, 83◦4007 00 W; soil type: Ultisols and Inceptisols, Turrialba, Costa Rica. The treatments included coffee (Coffea arabica L.) grown conventionally (with chemical fertilizers) and organically (without chemical fertilizers) under two shade trees, Erythrina poeppigiana (Walp.) O.F. Cook., and Terminalia Amazonia J.F.Gmel., Sun Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) (Sole stand of coffee without shade), and Native Forest. Three replicated composite soil samples were collected from each system for each depth class, and SOC stocks in three soil aggregate fractions (2000–250 μm, 250–53 μm, and <53 μm) and in the whole soil determined. The total SOC stocks were highest under forest (146.6 Mg C ha−1) and lowest under sun coffee (92.5 Mg C ha−1). No significant differences were noted in SOC stock within coffee AFS and sun coffee across fraction sizes and depth classes. Organic management of coffee under heavily pruned E. poeppigiana, with pruned litter returned to soil, increased SOC stocks for 0–10 cm depth soil only. High input of organic materials including pruned litter did not improve SOC stocks in deeper soil, whereas variations in silt and clay percentages had a significant effect on SOC stocks. The study suggests that high amounts of aboveground biomass alone are not a good indicator of increased SOC storage in AFS, particularly for soils of sites with historical characteristics and management similar to this study.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: 348797 Chatterjee, Nilovna, 108508 Ramachandran Nair, P.K. autor/a, 348800 Nair, Vimala D. autor/a, 348801 Bhattacharjee, Abhishek autor/a, 129521 Virginio Filho, Elias de Melo autor/a, 348802 Muschler, Rheinhold G. autor/a, 348803 Noponen, Martin R. A. autor/a
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:spa
Subjects:SISTEMAS AGROFORESTALES, UTILIZACION DE LA TIERRA, CARBONO, SUELO, CAFE, PLANTACION, ORDENACIÓN DE TIERRRAS,
Online Access:https://repositorio.catie.ac.cr/handle/11554/11586
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-BVE:148505
record_format koha
institution IICA
collection Koha
country Costa Rica
countrycode CR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-sibiica
tag biblioteca
region America Central
libraryname Sistema de Bibliotecas IICA/CATIE
language spa
topic SISTEMAS AGROFORESTALES
UTILIZACION DE LA TIERRA
CARBONO
SUELO
CAFE
PLANTACION
ORDENACIÓN DE TIERRRAS
SISTEMAS AGROFORESTALES
UTILIZACION DE LA TIERRA
CARBONO
SUELO
CAFE
PLANTACION
ORDENACIÓN DE TIERRRAS
spellingShingle SISTEMAS AGROFORESTALES
UTILIZACION DE LA TIERRA
CARBONO
SUELO
CAFE
PLANTACION
ORDENACIÓN DE TIERRRAS
SISTEMAS AGROFORESTALES
UTILIZACION DE LA TIERRA
CARBONO
SUELO
CAFE
PLANTACION
ORDENACIÓN DE TIERRRAS
348797 Chatterjee, Nilovna
108508 Ramachandran Nair, P.K. autor/a
348800 Nair, Vimala D. autor/a
348801 Bhattacharjee, Abhishek autor/a
129521 Virginio Filho, Elias de Melo autor/a
348802 Muschler, Rheinhold G. autor/a
348803 Noponen, Martin R. A. autor/a
Do Coffee Agroforestry Systems Always Improve Soil Carbon Stocks Deeper in the Soil?—A Case Study from Turrialba, Costa Rica
description Shaded perennial agroforestry systems (AFS) are regarded as desirable land-use practices that improve soil carbon sequestration. However, most studies assume a positive correlation between above ground and below ground carbon without considering the effect of past and current land management, textural variations (silt and clay percentage), and such other site-specific factors that have a major influence on the extent of soil C sequestration. We assessed SOC stock at various depths (0–10, 10–30, 30–60, and 60–100 cm) in shaded perennial coffee (Coffea arabica L.) AFS in a 17-year-old experimental field at theCentro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, (9◦5304400 N, 83◦4007 00 W; soil type: Ultisols and Inceptisols, Turrialba, Costa Rica. The treatments included coffee (Coffea arabica L.) grown conventionally (with chemical fertilizers) and organically (without chemical fertilizers) under two shade trees, Erythrina poeppigiana (Walp.) O.F. Cook., and Terminalia Amazonia J.F.Gmel., Sun Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) (Sole stand of coffee without shade), and Native Forest. Three replicated composite soil samples were collected from each system for each depth class, and SOC stocks in three soil aggregate fractions (2000–250 μm, 250–53 μm, and <53 μm) and in the whole soil determined. The total SOC stocks were highest under forest (146.6 Mg C ha−1) and lowest under sun coffee (92.5 Mg C ha−1). No significant differences were noted in SOC stock within coffee AFS and sun coffee across fraction sizes and depth classes. Organic management of coffee under heavily pruned E. poeppigiana, with pruned litter returned to soil, increased SOC stocks for 0–10 cm depth soil only. High input of organic materials including pruned litter did not improve SOC stocks in deeper soil, whereas variations in silt and clay percentages had a significant effect on SOC stocks. The study suggests that high amounts of aboveground biomass alone are not a good indicator of increased SOC storage in AFS, particularly for soils of sites with historical characteristics and management similar to this study.
format Texto
topic_facet SISTEMAS AGROFORESTALES
UTILIZACION DE LA TIERRA
CARBONO
SUELO
CAFE
PLANTACION
ORDENACIÓN DE TIERRRAS
author 348797 Chatterjee, Nilovna
108508 Ramachandran Nair, P.K. autor/a
348800 Nair, Vimala D. autor/a
348801 Bhattacharjee, Abhishek autor/a
129521 Virginio Filho, Elias de Melo autor/a
348802 Muschler, Rheinhold G. autor/a
348803 Noponen, Martin R. A. autor/a
author_facet 348797 Chatterjee, Nilovna
108508 Ramachandran Nair, P.K. autor/a
348800 Nair, Vimala D. autor/a
348801 Bhattacharjee, Abhishek autor/a
129521 Virginio Filho, Elias de Melo autor/a
348802 Muschler, Rheinhold G. autor/a
348803 Noponen, Martin R. A. autor/a
author_sort 348797 Chatterjee, Nilovna
title Do Coffee Agroforestry Systems Always Improve Soil Carbon Stocks Deeper in the Soil?—A Case Study from Turrialba, Costa Rica
title_short Do Coffee Agroforestry Systems Always Improve Soil Carbon Stocks Deeper in the Soil?—A Case Study from Turrialba, Costa Rica
title_full Do Coffee Agroforestry Systems Always Improve Soil Carbon Stocks Deeper in the Soil?—A Case Study from Turrialba, Costa Rica
title_fullStr Do Coffee Agroforestry Systems Always Improve Soil Carbon Stocks Deeper in the Soil?—A Case Study from Turrialba, Costa Rica
title_full_unstemmed Do Coffee Agroforestry Systems Always Improve Soil Carbon Stocks Deeper in the Soil?—A Case Study from Turrialba, Costa Rica
title_sort do coffee agroforestry systems always improve soil carbon stocks deeper in the soil?—a case study from turrialba, costa rica
url https://repositorio.catie.ac.cr/handle/11554/11586
work_keys_str_mv AT 348797chatterjeenilovna docoffeeagroforestrysystemsalwaysimprovesoilcarbonstocksdeeperinthesoilacasestudyfromturrialbacostarica
AT 108508ramachandrannairpkautora docoffeeagroforestrysystemsalwaysimprovesoilcarbonstocksdeeperinthesoilacasestudyfromturrialbacostarica
AT 348800nairvimaladautora docoffeeagroforestrysystemsalwaysimprovesoilcarbonstocksdeeperinthesoilacasestudyfromturrialbacostarica
AT 348801bhattacharjeeabhishekautora docoffeeagroforestrysystemsalwaysimprovesoilcarbonstocksdeeperinthesoilacasestudyfromturrialbacostarica
AT 129521virginiofilhoeliasdemeloautora docoffeeagroforestrysystemsalwaysimprovesoilcarbonstocksdeeperinthesoilacasestudyfromturrialbacostarica
AT 348802muschlerrheinholdgautora docoffeeagroforestrysystemsalwaysimprovesoilcarbonstocksdeeperinthesoilacasestudyfromturrialbacostarica
AT 348803noponenmartinraautora docoffeeagroforestrysystemsalwaysimprovesoilcarbonstocksdeeperinthesoilacasestudyfromturrialbacostarica
_version_ 1756067849911140352
spelling KOHA-OAI-BVE:1485052022-02-04T16:59:31ZDo Coffee Agroforestry Systems Always Improve Soil Carbon Stocks Deeper in the Soil?—A Case Study from Turrialba, Costa Rica 348797 Chatterjee, Nilovna 108508 Ramachandran Nair, P.K. autor/a 348800 Nair, Vimala D. autor/a 348801 Bhattacharjee, Abhishek autor/a 129521 Virginio Filho, Elias de Melo autor/a 348802 Muschler, Rheinhold G. autor/a 348803 Noponen, Martin R. A. autor/a textspaShaded perennial agroforestry systems (AFS) are regarded as desirable land-use practices that improve soil carbon sequestration. However, most studies assume a positive correlation between above ground and below ground carbon without considering the effect of past and current land management, textural variations (silt and clay percentage), and such other site-specific factors that have a major influence on the extent of soil C sequestration. We assessed SOC stock at various depths (0–10, 10–30, 30–60, and 60–100 cm) in shaded perennial coffee (Coffea arabica L.) AFS in a 17-year-old experimental field at theCentro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, (9◦5304400 N, 83◦4007 00 W; soil type: Ultisols and Inceptisols, Turrialba, Costa Rica. The treatments included coffee (Coffea arabica L.) grown conventionally (with chemical fertilizers) and organically (without chemical fertilizers) under two shade trees, Erythrina poeppigiana (Walp.) O.F. Cook., and Terminalia Amazonia J.F.Gmel., Sun Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) (Sole stand of coffee without shade), and Native Forest. Three replicated composite soil samples were collected from each system for each depth class, and SOC stocks in three soil aggregate fractions (2000–250 μm, 250–53 μm, and <53 μm) and in the whole soil determined. The total SOC stocks were highest under forest (146.6 Mg C ha−1) and lowest under sun coffee (92.5 Mg C ha−1). No significant differences were noted in SOC stock within coffee AFS and sun coffee across fraction sizes and depth classes. Organic management of coffee under heavily pruned E. poeppigiana, with pruned litter returned to soil, increased SOC stocks for 0–10 cm depth soil only. High input of organic materials including pruned litter did not improve SOC stocks in deeper soil, whereas variations in silt and clay percentages had a significant effect on SOC stocks. The study suggests that high amounts of aboveground biomass alone are not a good indicator of increased SOC storage in AFS, particularly for soils of sites with historical characteristics and management similar to this study.Shaded perennial agroforestry systems (AFS) are regarded as desirable land-use practices that improve soil carbon sequestration. However, most studies assume a positive correlation between above ground and below ground carbon without considering the effect of past and current land management, textural variations (silt and clay percentage), and such other site-specific factors that have a major influence on the extent of soil C sequestration. We assessed SOC stock at various depths (0–10, 10–30, 30–60, and 60–100 cm) in shaded perennial coffee (Coffea arabica L.) AFS in a 17-year-old experimental field at theCentro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, (9◦5304400 N, 83◦4007 00 W; soil type: Ultisols and Inceptisols, Turrialba, Costa Rica. The treatments included coffee (Coffea arabica L.) grown conventionally (with chemical fertilizers) and organically (without chemical fertilizers) under two shade trees, Erythrina poeppigiana (Walp.) O.F. Cook., and Terminalia Amazonia J.F.Gmel., Sun Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) (Sole stand of coffee without shade), and Native Forest. Three replicated composite soil samples were collected from each system for each depth class, and SOC stocks in three soil aggregate fractions (2000–250 μm, 250–53 μm, and <53 μm) and in the whole soil determined. The total SOC stocks were highest under forest (146.6 Mg C ha−1) and lowest under sun coffee (92.5 Mg C ha−1). No significant differences were noted in SOC stock within coffee AFS and sun coffee across fraction sizes and depth classes. Organic management of coffee under heavily pruned E. poeppigiana, with pruned litter returned to soil, increased SOC stocks for 0–10 cm depth soil only. High input of organic materials including pruned litter did not improve SOC stocks in deeper soil, whereas variations in silt and clay percentages had a significant effect on SOC stocks. The study suggests that high amounts of aboveground biomass alone are not a good indicator of increased SOC storage in AFS, particularly for soils of sites with historical characteristics and management similar to this study.SISTEMAS AGROFORESTALESUTILIZACION DE LA TIERRACARBONOSUELOCAFEPLANTACIONORDENACIÓN DE TIERRRASForests,https://repositorio.catie.ac.cr/handle/11554/11586