Assessing the role of economic instruments in a policy mix for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision : a review of some methodological challenges

In this paper we review a number of methodological challenges of evaluating and designing economic instruments aimed at biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision in an existing policy mix. In the context of the EU 2010 goal of halting biodiversity loss, researchers have been called upon to evaluate the role of economic instruments for cost-effective decision-making, as well as non-market methods to assess their benefits. We argue that cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and non-market valuation (NMV) methods are necessary, but not sufficient, approaches to assessing the role of economic instruments in a policy mix. We review the principles of "social-ecological systems" (SES) [1] and discuss how SES can complement economic cost and benefit assessment methods, in particular in policy design research. To illustrate our conceptual comparison of assessment methodologies, we look at two examples of economic instruments at different government levels - payments for ecosystem services (PES) at 14 farm level and ecological fiscal transfers to municipal /county government. Which policy design issues can cost-effectiveness analysis and non-market valuation methods address for these two instruments? What conceptual problems are introduced when evaluating policies in an instrument mix? How can the SES framework complement CEA and NMV in policy assessment and design? We draw on experiences from Brazil and Costa Rica to exemplify these questions. We conclude with some research propositions.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: 46997 Barton, David N. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Noruega, 110849 Ring, Irene (autor/a) UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany, 114143 Rusch, Graciela M. (autor/a) Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Noruega, 92004 May, Peter (autor/a) Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, DeClerck, Fabrice A. J. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica 61747, 128809 Vignola, Raffaele (autor/a) CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica, 129623 Vivan, Jorge Luis (autor/a) Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 43071 Ansink, Erik (autor/a) Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 126244 Unnerstall, Herwig (autor/a) UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany, 116243 Santos, Rui (autor/a) New University of Lisbon, Portugal, 79515 Ibrahim, Muhammad (autor/a) CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica, 39493 ... [y otros 6]
Format: Texto biblioteca
Language:eng
Published: [Lugar de publicación no identificado] : POLICYMIX , 20
Subjects:CONSERVACION DE LA DIVERSIDAD BIOLOGICA, ECOSISTEMA, INCENTIVOS, POLITICAS, ECONOMETRIA, INSTRUMENTOS DE MEDICION, ANALISIS DE COSTOS Y BENEFICIOS, METODOLOGIA, EVALUACIÓN, ACTIVIDADES ECONÓMICAS, SERVICIOS ECOSISTEMICOS,
Online Access:http://repositorio.bibliotecaorton.catie.ac.cr/bitstream/handle/11554/8242/Assessing_the_role_of_economic_instruments.pdf
http://hdl.handle.net/11554/8242
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id KOHA-OAI-BVE:137110
record_format koha
institution IICA
collection Koha
country Costa Rica
countrycode CR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
En linea
databasecode cat-sibiica
tag biblioteca
region America Central
libraryname Sistema de Bibliotecas IICA/CATIE
language eng
topic CONSERVACION DE LA DIVERSIDAD BIOLOGICA
ECOSISTEMA
INCENTIVOS
POLITICAS
ECONOMETRIA
INSTRUMENTOS DE MEDICION
ANALISIS DE COSTOS Y BENEFICIOS
METODOLOGIA
EVALUACIÓN
ACTIVIDADES ECONÓMICAS
SERVICIOS ECOSISTEMICOS
CONSERVACION DE LA DIVERSIDAD BIOLOGICA
ECOSISTEMA
INCENTIVOS
POLITICAS
ECONOMETRIA
INSTRUMENTOS DE MEDICION
ANALISIS DE COSTOS Y BENEFICIOS
METODOLOGIA
EVALUACIÓN
ACTIVIDADES ECONÓMICAS
SERVICIOS ECOSISTEMICOS
spellingShingle CONSERVACION DE LA DIVERSIDAD BIOLOGICA
ECOSISTEMA
INCENTIVOS
POLITICAS
ECONOMETRIA
INSTRUMENTOS DE MEDICION
ANALISIS DE COSTOS Y BENEFICIOS
METODOLOGIA
EVALUACIÓN
ACTIVIDADES ECONÓMICAS
SERVICIOS ECOSISTEMICOS
CONSERVACION DE LA DIVERSIDAD BIOLOGICA
ECOSISTEMA
INCENTIVOS
POLITICAS
ECONOMETRIA
INSTRUMENTOS DE MEDICION
ANALISIS DE COSTOS Y BENEFICIOS
METODOLOGIA
EVALUACIÓN
ACTIVIDADES ECONÓMICAS
SERVICIOS ECOSISTEMICOS
46997 Barton, David N. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Noruega
110849 Ring, Irene (autor/a) UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany
114143 Rusch, Graciela M. (autor/a) Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Noruega
92004 May, Peter (autor/a) Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
DeClerck, Fabrice A. J. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica 61747
128809 Vignola, Raffaele (autor/a) CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica
129623 Vivan, Jorge Luis (autor/a) Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
43071 Ansink, Erik (autor/a) Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
126244 Unnerstall, Herwig (autor/a) UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany
116243 Santos, Rui (autor/a) New University of Lisbon, Portugal
79515 Ibrahim, Muhammad (autor/a) CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica
39493 ... [y otros 6]
Assessing the role of economic instruments in a policy mix for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision : a review of some methodological challenges
description In this paper we review a number of methodological challenges of evaluating and designing economic instruments aimed at biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision in an existing policy mix. In the context of the EU 2010 goal of halting biodiversity loss, researchers have been called upon to evaluate the role of economic instruments for cost-effective decision-making, as well as non-market methods to assess their benefits. We argue that cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and non-market valuation (NMV) methods are necessary, but not sufficient, approaches to assessing the role of economic instruments in a policy mix. We review the principles of "social-ecological systems" (SES) [1] and discuss how SES can complement economic cost and benefit assessment methods, in particular in policy design research. To illustrate our conceptual comparison of assessment methodologies, we look at two examples of economic instruments at different government levels - payments for ecosystem services (PES) at 14 farm level and ecological fiscal transfers to municipal /county government. Which policy design issues can cost-effectiveness analysis and non-market valuation methods address for these two instruments? What conceptual problems are introduced when evaluating policies in an instrument mix? How can the SES framework complement CEA and NMV in policy assessment and design? We draw on experiences from Brazil and Costa Rica to exemplify these questions. We conclude with some research propositions.
format Texto
topic_facet CONSERVACION DE LA DIVERSIDAD BIOLOGICA
ECOSISTEMA
INCENTIVOS
POLITICAS
ECONOMETRIA
INSTRUMENTOS DE MEDICION
ANALISIS DE COSTOS Y BENEFICIOS
METODOLOGIA
EVALUACIÓN
ACTIVIDADES ECONÓMICAS
SERVICIOS ECOSISTEMICOS
author 46997 Barton, David N. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Noruega
110849 Ring, Irene (autor/a) UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany
114143 Rusch, Graciela M. (autor/a) Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Noruega
92004 May, Peter (autor/a) Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
DeClerck, Fabrice A. J. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica 61747
128809 Vignola, Raffaele (autor/a) CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica
129623 Vivan, Jorge Luis (autor/a) Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
43071 Ansink, Erik (autor/a) Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
126244 Unnerstall, Herwig (autor/a) UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany
116243 Santos, Rui (autor/a) New University of Lisbon, Portugal
79515 Ibrahim, Muhammad (autor/a) CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica
39493 ... [y otros 6]
author_facet 46997 Barton, David N. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Noruega
110849 Ring, Irene (autor/a) UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany
114143 Rusch, Graciela M. (autor/a) Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Noruega
92004 May, Peter (autor/a) Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
DeClerck, Fabrice A. J. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica 61747
128809 Vignola, Raffaele (autor/a) CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica
129623 Vivan, Jorge Luis (autor/a) Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
43071 Ansink, Erik (autor/a) Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
126244 Unnerstall, Herwig (autor/a) UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany
116243 Santos, Rui (autor/a) New University of Lisbon, Portugal
79515 Ibrahim, Muhammad (autor/a) CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica
39493 ... [y otros 6]
author_sort 46997 Barton, David N. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Noruega
title Assessing the role of economic instruments in a policy mix for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision : a review of some methodological challenges
title_short Assessing the role of economic instruments in a policy mix for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision : a review of some methodological challenges
title_full Assessing the role of economic instruments in a policy mix for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision : a review of some methodological challenges
title_fullStr Assessing the role of economic instruments in a policy mix for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision : a review of some methodological challenges
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the role of economic instruments in a policy mix for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision : a review of some methodological challenges
title_sort assessing the role of economic instruments in a policy mix for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision : a review of some methodological challenges
publisher [Lugar de publicación no identificado] : POLICYMIX
publishDate , 20
url http://repositorio.bibliotecaorton.catie.ac.cr/bitstream/handle/11554/8242/Assessing_the_role_of_economic_instruments.pdf
http://hdl.handle.net/11554/8242
work_keys_str_mv AT 46997bartondavidnnorwegianinstitutefornatureresearchnoruega assessingtheroleofeconomicinstrumentsinapolicymixforbiodiversityconservationandecosystemservicesprovisionareviewofsomemethodologicalchallenges
AT 110849ringireneautoraufzhelmholtzcentreforenvironmentalresearchleipziggermany assessingtheroleofeconomicinstrumentsinapolicymixforbiodiversityconservationandecosystemservicesprovisionareviewofsomemethodologicalchallenges
AT 114143ruschgracielamautoranorwegianinstitutefornatureresearchnoruega assessingtheroleofeconomicinstrumentsinapolicymixforbiodiversityconservationandecosystemservicesprovisionareviewofsomemethodologicalchallenges
AT 92004maypeterautorafederalruraluniversityofriodejaneirobrazil assessingtheroleofeconomicinstrumentsinapolicymixforbiodiversityconservationandecosystemservicesprovisionareviewofsomemethodologicalchallenges
AT declerckfabriceajcatieturrialbacostarica61747 assessingtheroleofeconomicinstrumentsinapolicymixforbiodiversityconservationandecosystemservicesprovisionareviewofsomemethodologicalchallenges
AT 128809vignolaraffaeleautoracatieturrialbacostarica assessingtheroleofeconomicinstrumentsinapolicymixforbiodiversityconservationandecosystemservicesprovisionareviewofsomemethodologicalchallenges
AT 129623vivanjorgeluisautorafederalruraluniversityofriodejaneirobrazil assessingtheroleofeconomicinstrumentsinapolicymixforbiodiversityconservationandecosystemservicesprovisionareviewofsomemethodologicalchallenges
AT 43071ansinkerikautoravrijeuniversiteitamsterdamthenetherlands assessingtheroleofeconomicinstrumentsinapolicymixforbiodiversityconservationandecosystemservicesprovisionareviewofsomemethodologicalchallenges
AT 126244unnerstallherwigautoraufzhelmholtzcentreforenvironmentalresearchleipziggermany assessingtheroleofeconomicinstrumentsinapolicymixforbiodiversityconservationandecosystemservicesprovisionareviewofsomemethodologicalchallenges
AT 116243santosruiautoranewuniversityoflisbonportugal assessingtheroleofeconomicinstrumentsinapolicymixforbiodiversityconservationandecosystemservicesprovisionareviewofsomemethodologicalchallenges
AT 79515ibrahimmuhammadautoracatieturrialbacostarica assessingtheroleofeconomicinstrumentsinapolicymixforbiodiversityconservationandecosystemservicesprovisionareviewofsomemethodologicalchallenges
AT 39493yotros6 assessingtheroleofeconomicinstrumentsinapolicymixforbiodiversityconservationandecosystemservicesprovisionareviewofsomemethodologicalchallenges
_version_ 1756066326710845440
spelling KOHA-OAI-BVE:1371102022-11-07T15:27:57ZAssessing the role of economic instruments in a policy mix for biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision : a review of some methodological challenges 46997 Barton, David N. Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Noruega 110849 Ring, Irene (autor/a) UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany 114143 Rusch, Graciela M. (autor/a) Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Noruega 92004 May, Peter (autor/a) Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil DeClerck, Fabrice A. J. CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica 61747 128809 Vignola, Raffaele (autor/a) CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica 129623 Vivan, Jorge Luis (autor/a) Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 43071 Ansink, Erik (autor/a) Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands 126244 Unnerstall, Herwig (autor/a) UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany 116243 Santos, Rui (autor/a) New University of Lisbon, Portugal 79515 Ibrahim, Muhammad (autor/a) CATIE, Turrialba, Costa Rica 39493 ... [y otros 6] text[Lugar de publicación no identificado] : POLICYMIX, 2010engpdfIn this paper we review a number of methodological challenges of evaluating and designing economic instruments aimed at biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision in an existing policy mix. In the context of the EU 2010 goal of halting biodiversity loss, researchers have been called upon to evaluate the role of economic instruments for cost-effective decision-making, as well as non-market methods to assess their benefits. We argue that cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and non-market valuation (NMV) methods are necessary, but not sufficient, approaches to assessing the role of economic instruments in a policy mix. We review the principles of "social-ecological systems" (SES) [1] and discuss how SES can complement economic cost and benefit assessment methods, in particular in policy design research. To illustrate our conceptual comparison of assessment methodologies, we look at two examples of economic instruments at different government levels - payments for ecosystem services (PES) at 14 farm level and ecological fiscal transfers to municipal /county government. Which policy design issues can cost-effectiveness analysis and non-market valuation methods address for these two instruments? What conceptual problems are introduced when evaluating policies in an instrument mix? How can the SES framework complement CEA and NMV in policy assessment and design? We draw on experiences from Brazil and Costa Rica to exemplify these questions. We conclude with some research propositions.Bibliografía páginas 23-29In this paper we review a number of methodological challenges of evaluating and designing economic instruments aimed at biodiversity conservation and ecosystem services provision in an existing policy mix. In the context of the EU 2010 goal of halting biodiversity loss, researchers have been called upon to evaluate the role of economic instruments for cost-effective decision-making, as well as non-market methods to assess their benefits. We argue that cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) and non-market valuation (NMV) methods are necessary, but not sufficient, approaches to assessing the role of economic instruments in a policy mix. We review the principles of "social-ecological systems" (SES) [1] and discuss how SES can complement economic cost and benefit assessment methods, in particular in policy design research. To illustrate our conceptual comparison of assessment methodologies, we look at two examples of economic instruments at different government levels - payments for ecosystem services (PES) at 14 farm level and ecological fiscal transfers to municipal /county government. Which policy design issues can cost-effectiveness analysis and non-market valuation methods address for these two instruments? What conceptual problems are introduced when evaluating policies in an instrument mix? How can the SES framework complement CEA and NMV in policy assessment and design? We draw on experiences from Brazil and Costa Rica to exemplify these questions. We conclude with some research propositions.CONSERVACION DE LA DIVERSIDAD BIOLOGICAECOSISTEMAINCENTIVOSPOLITICASECONOMETRIAINSTRUMENTOS DE MEDICIONANALISIS DE COSTOS Y BENEFICIOSMETODOLOGIAEVALUACIÓNACTIVIDADES ECONÓMICASSERVICIOS ECOSISTEMICOShttp://repositorio.bibliotecaorton.catie.ac.cr/bitstream/handle/11554/8242/Assessing_the_role_of_economic_instruments.pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11554/8242