Managing food security risks and intra-regional trade in Africa
A crucial part of the process of developing a CSA strategy is to understand barriers to adoption of CSA practices. Some barriers may be due to trade-offs that CSA practices engender in terms of resource use (e.g. crop residue management competing with livestock forage or labour intensiveness of some practices). However, it can also be that farmers would like to adopt certain practices, but do not due to institutional barriers, financial bottlenecks, or a lack of access to input or output markets. Understanding what drives adoption or dis-adoption of CSA practices is an empirical question that needs to be answered to make informed choices on guiding policies and investments. With an appreciation of potentially relevant CSA practices, the barriers to their adoption, their implications for farmers’ management of risk, and the benefits and costs of these different CSA practices, it is possible to combine this information to develop a CSA strategy that takes into consideration technical, institutional, and economic aspects. This will allow for a prioritization of CSA activities and create an enabling and coherent policy environment for agricultural development that takes climate change into account.
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Texto biblioteca |
Language: | eng |
Published: |
Rome (Italy) FAO/NEPAD
2016
|
Subjects: | foods, prices, food security, governance, transport infrastructure, investment, public-private cooperation, legal frameworks, development policies, trade policies, |
Online Access: | http://www.fao.org/3/a-I5403e.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
unfao:843431 |
---|---|
record_format |
koha |
spelling |
unfao:8434312021-05-05T06:52:06ZManaging food security risks and intra-regional trade in Africa 1423211761505 Morrison, J. 186548 FAO, Rome (Italy). Trade and Markets Div. eng 409151 New Partnership for Africa's Development, Midrand (South Africa) eng textRome (Italy) FAO/NEPAD2016engA crucial part of the process of developing a CSA strategy is to understand barriers to adoption of CSA practices. Some barriers may be due to trade-offs that CSA practices engender in terms of resource use (e.g. crop residue management competing with livestock forage or labour intensiveness of some practices). However, it can also be that farmers would like to adopt certain practices, but do not due to institutional barriers, financial bottlenecks, or a lack of access to input or output markets. Understanding what drives adoption or dis-adoption of CSA practices is an empirical question that needs to be answered to make informed choices on guiding policies and investments. With an appreciation of potentially relevant CSA practices, the barriers to their adoption, their implications for farmers’ management of risk, and the benefits and costs of these different CSA practices, it is possible to combine this information to develop a CSA strategy that takes into consideration technical, institutional, and economic aspects. This will allow for a prioritization of CSA activities and create an enabling and coherent policy environment for agricultural development that takes climate change into account. A crucial part of the process of developing a CSA strategy is to understand barriers to adoption of CSA practices. Some barriers may be due to trade-offs that CSA practices engender in terms of resource use (e.g. crop residue management competing with livestock forage or labour intensiveness of some practices). However, it can also be that farmers would like to adopt certain practices, but do not due to institutional barriers, financial bottlenecks, or a lack of access to input or output markets. Understanding what drives adoption or dis-adoption of CSA practices is an empirical question that needs to be answered to make informed choices on guiding policies and investments. With an appreciation of potentially relevant CSA practices, the barriers to their adoption, their implications for farmers’ management of risk, and the benefits and costs of these different CSA practices, it is possible to combine this information to develop a CSA strategy that takes into consideration technical, institutional, and economic aspects. This will allow for a prioritization of CSA activities and create an enabling and coherent policy environment for agricultural development that takes climate change into account. foodspricesfood securitygovernancetransport infrastructureinvestmentpublic-private cooperationlegal frameworksdevelopment policiestrade policieshttp://www.fao.org/3/a-I5403e.pdf |
institution |
FAO IT |
collection |
Koha |
country |
Italia |
countrycode |
IT |
component |
Bibliográfico |
access |
En linea En linea |
databasecode |
cat-fao-it |
tag |
biblioteca |
region |
Europa del Sur |
libraryname |
David Lubin Memorial Library of FAO |
language |
eng |
topic |
foods prices food security governance transport infrastructure investment public-private cooperation legal frameworks development policies trade policies foods prices food security governance transport infrastructure investment public-private cooperation legal frameworks development policies trade policies |
spellingShingle |
foods prices food security governance transport infrastructure investment public-private cooperation legal frameworks development policies trade policies foods prices food security governance transport infrastructure investment public-private cooperation legal frameworks development policies trade policies 1423211761505 Morrison, J. 186548 FAO, Rome (Italy). Trade and Markets Div. eng 409151 New Partnership for Africa's Development, Midrand (South Africa) eng Managing food security risks and intra-regional trade in Africa |
description |
A crucial part of the process of developing a CSA strategy is to understand barriers to adoption of CSA practices. Some barriers may be due to trade-offs that CSA practices engender in terms of resource use (e.g. crop residue management competing with livestock forage or labour intensiveness of some practices). However, it can also be that farmers would like to adopt certain practices, but do not due to institutional barriers, financial bottlenecks, or a lack of access to input or output markets. Understanding what drives adoption or dis-adoption of CSA practices is an empirical question that needs to be answered to make informed choices on guiding policies and investments. With an appreciation of potentially relevant CSA practices, the barriers to their adoption, their implications for farmers’ management of risk, and the benefits and costs of these different CSA practices, it is possible to combine this information to develop a CSA strategy that takes into consideration technical, institutional, and economic aspects. This will allow for a prioritization of CSA activities and create an enabling and coherent policy environment for agricultural development that takes climate change into account. |
format |
Texto |
topic_facet |
foods prices food security governance transport infrastructure investment public-private cooperation legal frameworks development policies trade policies |
author |
1423211761505 Morrison, J. 186548 FAO, Rome (Italy). Trade and Markets Div. eng 409151 New Partnership for Africa's Development, Midrand (South Africa) eng |
author_facet |
1423211761505 Morrison, J. 186548 FAO, Rome (Italy). Trade and Markets Div. eng 409151 New Partnership for Africa's Development, Midrand (South Africa) eng |
author_sort |
1423211761505 Morrison, J. |
title |
Managing food security risks and intra-regional trade in Africa |
title_short |
Managing food security risks and intra-regional trade in Africa |
title_full |
Managing food security risks and intra-regional trade in Africa |
title_fullStr |
Managing food security risks and intra-regional trade in Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Managing food security risks and intra-regional trade in Africa |
title_sort |
managing food security risks and intra-regional trade in africa |
publisher |
Rome (Italy) FAO/NEPAD |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://www.fao.org/3/a-I5403e.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT 1423211761505morrisonj managingfoodsecurityrisksandintraregionaltradeinafrica AT 186548faoromeitalytradeandmarketsdiveng managingfoodsecurityrisksandintraregionaltradeinafrica AT 409151newpartnershipforafricasdevelopmentmidrandsouthafricaeng managingfoodsecurityrisksandintraregionaltradeinafrica |
_version_ |
1768618676966129664 |