Las reservas privadas ¿son efectivas para conservar las propiedades de los ecosistemas?

To evaluate the contribution to conservation of private refuges, we compared the ecosystem functioning of this type of conservation (Refuge) with contiguous national parks (Park) and rural ranches and farms under traditional management (Traditional). We assume the Park as the reference situation, in as much they constitute the areas with the lowest human intervention. The analysis was based on three descriptors of the seasonal dynamics of the carbon gains, derived from spectral data provided by the MODIS sensor: the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index integral (NDVI-I), a spectral index related to the total carbon gains of the ecosystem; the relative range (RRel: (maximum NDVI-minimum NDVI) /(NDVI-I), and the month of occurrence of the maximum value of NDVI (MMax). These last two attributes characterize the seasonality and phenology of vegetation. We worked on three contrasting biogeographic regions of Argentina (Paranaense forest (Misiones province), Mesopotamic Pampa (Entre Ríos province), Interior Pampa (Córdoba province). In the Paranaense forest, the Refuge presented a lower NDVI-I value than the Park, but higher than the Traditional (P greather than 0.05). The seasonality of the vegetation carbon gains (RRel) was lower on the Park than for the other two managements. In the Mesopotamic Pampa, the gallery forests were the most productive unit (higher NDVI-I). The Refuge presented an intermediate behavior. Grasslands presented the highest NDVI-I on the Refuge (P greather than 0.05). The emblematic vegetation of this region (the palm savannas), did not differ among managements. The seasonality was lower in the gallery forests of the Park. In the Interior Pampa, the differences between Refuge and Traditional, both in NDVI-I and RRel, were not significantly different among vegetation types or managements. The MMax did not differ between managements for any of the regions studied. Our results showed that for most of the ecosystem attributes considered, the Refuge presented values more similar to those of the reference situation (the Park) than to the traditional management alternatives. Private conservation therefore has being efficient for the conservation and maintenance of the ecosystemic processes and services bounded to the dynamic of the vegetation carbon gains.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roldán, M., Carminati, A., Biganzoli, F., Paruelo, J. M.
Format: article biblioteca
Language:spa
Subjects:ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING, INTERIOR PAMPA, MESOPOTAMIC PAMPA, PARANAENSE FOREST, PRIVATE LAND CONSERVATION, REMOTE SENSING, CARBON BUDGET, COMPARATIVE STUDY, CONSERVATION PLANNING, ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION, ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT, ECOSYSTEM SERVICE, MODIS, NATIONAL PARK, NDVI, PHENOLOGY, REFUGE, SAVANNA, SEASONALITY, SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, VEGETATION COVER, ARGENTINA,
Online Access:http://ri.agro.uba.ar/greenstone3/library/collection/arti/document/2010Roldan
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id snrd:2010Roldan
record_format koha
spelling snrd:2010Roldan2021-10-15T16:56:07Z Roldán, M. Carminati, A. Biganzoli, F. Paruelo, J. M. 2010 To evaluate the contribution to conservation of private refuges, we compared the ecosystem functioning of this type of conservation (Refuge) with contiguous national parks (Park) and rural ranches and farms under traditional management (Traditional). We assume the Park as the reference situation, in as much they constitute the areas with the lowest human intervention. The analysis was based on three descriptors of the seasonal dynamics of the carbon gains, derived from spectral data provided by the MODIS sensor: the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index integral (NDVI-I), a spectral index related to the total carbon gains of the ecosystem; the relative range (RRel: (maximum NDVI-minimum NDVI) /(NDVI-I), and the month of occurrence of the maximum value of NDVI (MMax). These last two attributes characterize the seasonality and phenology of vegetation. We worked on three contrasting biogeographic regions of Argentina (Paranaense forest (Misiones province), Mesopotamic Pampa (Entre Ríos province), Interior Pampa (Córdoba province). In the Paranaense forest, the Refuge presented a lower NDVI-I value than the Park, but higher than the Traditional (P greather than 0.05). The seasonality of the vegetation carbon gains (RRel) was lower on the Park than for the other two managements. In the Mesopotamic Pampa, the gallery forests were the most productive unit (higher NDVI-I). The Refuge presented an intermediate behavior. Grasslands presented the highest NDVI-I on the Refuge (P greather than 0.05). The emblematic vegetation of this region (the palm savannas), did not differ among managements. The seasonality was lower in the gallery forests of the Park. In the Interior Pampa, the differences between Refuge and Traditional, both in NDVI-I and RRel, were not significantly different among vegetation types or managements. The MMax did not differ between managements for any of the regions studied. Our results showed that for most of the ecosystem attributes considered, the Refuge presented values more similar to those of the reference situation (the Park) than to the traditional management alternatives. Private conservation therefore has being efficient for the conservation and maintenance of the ecosystemic processes and services bounded to the dynamic of the vegetation carbon gains. application/pdf 0327-5477 http://ri.agro.uba.ar/greenstone3/library/collection/arti/document/2010Roldan spa info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess openAccess http://ri.agro.uba.ar/greenstone3/library/page/biblioteca#section4 Ecología austral Vol.20, no.2 185-199 https://asaeargentina.com.ar ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING INTERIOR PAMPA MESOPOTAMIC PAMPA PARANAENSE FOREST PRIVATE LAND CONSERVATION REMOTE SENSING CARBON BUDGET COMPARATIVE STUDY CONSERVATION PLANNING ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT ECOSYSTEM SERVICE MODIS NATIONAL PARK NDVI PHENOLOGY REFUGE SAVANNA SEASONALITY SPECTRAL ANALYSIS VEGETATION COVER ARGENTINA Las reservas privadas ¿son efectivas para conservar las propiedades de los ecosistemas? article info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion publishedVersion
institution UBA
collection DSpace
country Argentina
countrycode AR
component Bibliográfico
access En linea
databasecode dig-ubafa
tag biblioteca
region America del Sur
libraryname Biblioteca Facultad de Agronomía
language spa
topic ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING
INTERIOR PAMPA
MESOPOTAMIC PAMPA
PARANAENSE FOREST
PRIVATE LAND CONSERVATION
REMOTE SENSING
CARBON BUDGET
COMPARATIVE STUDY
CONSERVATION PLANNING
ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION
ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT
ECOSYSTEM SERVICE
MODIS
NATIONAL PARK
NDVI
PHENOLOGY
REFUGE
SAVANNA
SEASONALITY
SPECTRAL ANALYSIS
VEGETATION COVER
ARGENTINA
ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING
INTERIOR PAMPA
MESOPOTAMIC PAMPA
PARANAENSE FOREST
PRIVATE LAND CONSERVATION
REMOTE SENSING
CARBON BUDGET
COMPARATIVE STUDY
CONSERVATION PLANNING
ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION
ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT
ECOSYSTEM SERVICE
MODIS
NATIONAL PARK
NDVI
PHENOLOGY
REFUGE
SAVANNA
SEASONALITY
SPECTRAL ANALYSIS
VEGETATION COVER
ARGENTINA
spellingShingle ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING
INTERIOR PAMPA
MESOPOTAMIC PAMPA
PARANAENSE FOREST
PRIVATE LAND CONSERVATION
REMOTE SENSING
CARBON BUDGET
COMPARATIVE STUDY
CONSERVATION PLANNING
ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION
ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT
ECOSYSTEM SERVICE
MODIS
NATIONAL PARK
NDVI
PHENOLOGY
REFUGE
SAVANNA
SEASONALITY
SPECTRAL ANALYSIS
VEGETATION COVER
ARGENTINA
ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING
INTERIOR PAMPA
MESOPOTAMIC PAMPA
PARANAENSE FOREST
PRIVATE LAND CONSERVATION
REMOTE SENSING
CARBON BUDGET
COMPARATIVE STUDY
CONSERVATION PLANNING
ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION
ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT
ECOSYSTEM SERVICE
MODIS
NATIONAL PARK
NDVI
PHENOLOGY
REFUGE
SAVANNA
SEASONALITY
SPECTRAL ANALYSIS
VEGETATION COVER
ARGENTINA
Roldán, M.
Carminati, A.
Biganzoli, F.
Paruelo, J. M.
Las reservas privadas ¿son efectivas para conservar las propiedades de los ecosistemas?
description To evaluate the contribution to conservation of private refuges, we compared the ecosystem functioning of this type of conservation (Refuge) with contiguous national parks (Park) and rural ranches and farms under traditional management (Traditional). We assume the Park as the reference situation, in as much they constitute the areas with the lowest human intervention. The analysis was based on three descriptors of the seasonal dynamics of the carbon gains, derived from spectral data provided by the MODIS sensor: the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index integral (NDVI-I), a spectral index related to the total carbon gains of the ecosystem; the relative range (RRel: (maximum NDVI-minimum NDVI) /(NDVI-I), and the month of occurrence of the maximum value of NDVI (MMax). These last two attributes characterize the seasonality and phenology of vegetation. We worked on three contrasting biogeographic regions of Argentina (Paranaense forest (Misiones province), Mesopotamic Pampa (Entre Ríos province), Interior Pampa (Córdoba province). In the Paranaense forest, the Refuge presented a lower NDVI-I value than the Park, but higher than the Traditional (P greather than 0.05). The seasonality of the vegetation carbon gains (RRel) was lower on the Park than for the other two managements. In the Mesopotamic Pampa, the gallery forests were the most productive unit (higher NDVI-I). The Refuge presented an intermediate behavior. Grasslands presented the highest NDVI-I on the Refuge (P greather than 0.05). The emblematic vegetation of this region (the palm savannas), did not differ among managements. The seasonality was lower in the gallery forests of the Park. In the Interior Pampa, the differences between Refuge and Traditional, both in NDVI-I and RRel, were not significantly different among vegetation types or managements. The MMax did not differ between managements for any of the regions studied. Our results showed that for most of the ecosystem attributes considered, the Refuge presented values more similar to those of the reference situation (the Park) than to the traditional management alternatives. Private conservation therefore has being efficient for the conservation and maintenance of the ecosystemic processes and services bounded to the dynamic of the vegetation carbon gains.
format article
topic_facet ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING
INTERIOR PAMPA
MESOPOTAMIC PAMPA
PARANAENSE FOREST
PRIVATE LAND CONSERVATION
REMOTE SENSING
CARBON BUDGET
COMPARATIVE STUDY
CONSERVATION PLANNING
ECOSYSTEM FUNCTION
ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT
ECOSYSTEM SERVICE
MODIS
NATIONAL PARK
NDVI
PHENOLOGY
REFUGE
SAVANNA
SEASONALITY
SPECTRAL ANALYSIS
VEGETATION COVER
ARGENTINA
author Roldán, M.
Carminati, A.
Biganzoli, F.
Paruelo, J. M.
author_facet Roldán, M.
Carminati, A.
Biganzoli, F.
Paruelo, J. M.
author_sort Roldán, M.
title Las reservas privadas ¿son efectivas para conservar las propiedades de los ecosistemas?
title_short Las reservas privadas ¿son efectivas para conservar las propiedades de los ecosistemas?
title_full Las reservas privadas ¿son efectivas para conservar las propiedades de los ecosistemas?
title_fullStr Las reservas privadas ¿son efectivas para conservar las propiedades de los ecosistemas?
title_full_unstemmed Las reservas privadas ¿son efectivas para conservar las propiedades de los ecosistemas?
title_sort las reservas privadas ¿son efectivas para conservar las propiedades de los ecosistemas?
url http://ri.agro.uba.ar/greenstone3/library/collection/arti/document/2010Roldan
work_keys_str_mv AT roldanm lasreservasprivadassonefectivasparaconservarlaspropiedadesdelosecosistemas
AT carminatia lasreservasprivadassonefectivasparaconservarlaspropiedadesdelosecosistemas
AT biganzolif lasreservasprivadassonefectivasparaconservarlaspropiedadesdelosecosistemas
AT paruelojm lasreservasprivadassonefectivasparaconservarlaspropiedadesdelosecosistemas
_version_ 1756546320089219072