Comparison of the effects of low-level laser and pulsed and continuous ultrasound on pain and physical disability in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial

Abstract Objective: To compare the short-term effects of pulsed laser and pulsed and continuous ultrasound on pain and functional disability in women with chronic non-specific low back pain. Methods: The sample was composed of 100 volunteers randomly allocated into four groups: The Pulsed Laser Group (n = 26) was treated with 3 J/cm2; the Pulsed Ultrasound Group (n = 24; 3 MHz) was treated with 1 W/cm2; the Continuous Ultrasound Group (n = 26; 1 MHz) was treated with 1 W/cm2; and a Control Group (n = 24), where the patients were still waiting for treatment. Before and after 10 sessions of treatment, the intensity of pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the quality of pain was evaluated using the McGill pain questionnaire and functional disability was investigated using the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Results: The three treated groups exhibited a decrease in pain (p < 0.001); the Pulsed Laser Group showed the greater relative gain (91.2%), Meanwhile, the Control Group exhibited a worsening of - 5.8%. The three treated groups demonstrated improvement in the quality of pain (McGill) in the total, sensory and affective dimensions (p < 0.005; p < 0.002; p < 0.013, respectively). All treated groups showed a decrease in functional disability (p < 0.001), but the Pulsed Ultrasound Group showed the highest relative gain (83.3%). Conclusions: The three modalities have significant effects to decreasing low back pain and improving functional disability in women with non-specific chronic low back pain, but the pulsed low-level laser had the best results on pain while the pulsed ultrasound had the best results on improve the functional disability. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02150096.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rubira,Ana Paula Fernandes De Angelis, Rubira,Marcelo Custódio, Rubira,Lucas De Angelis, Comachio,Josielli, Magalhães,Maurício Oliveira, Marques,Amélia Pasqual
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia 2019
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2523-31062019000100243
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2523-31062019000100243
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2523-310620190001002432020-01-06Comparison of the effects of low-level laser and pulsed and continuous ultrasound on pain and physical disability in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trialRubira,Ana Paula Fernandes De AngelisRubira,Marcelo CustódioRubira,Lucas De AngelisComachio,JosielliMagalhães,Maurício OliveiraMarques,Amélia Pasqual Low back pain Laser therapy and ultrasound therapy Abstract Objective: To compare the short-term effects of pulsed laser and pulsed and continuous ultrasound on pain and functional disability in women with chronic non-specific low back pain. Methods: The sample was composed of 100 volunteers randomly allocated into four groups: The Pulsed Laser Group (n = 26) was treated with 3 J/cm2; the Pulsed Ultrasound Group (n = 24; 3 MHz) was treated with 1 W/cm2; the Continuous Ultrasound Group (n = 26; 1 MHz) was treated with 1 W/cm2; and a Control Group (n = 24), where the patients were still waiting for treatment. Before and after 10 sessions of treatment, the intensity of pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the quality of pain was evaluated using the McGill pain questionnaire and functional disability was investigated using the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Results: The three treated groups exhibited a decrease in pain (p < 0.001); the Pulsed Laser Group showed the greater relative gain (91.2%), Meanwhile, the Control Group exhibited a worsening of - 5.8%. The three treated groups demonstrated improvement in the quality of pain (McGill) in the total, sensory and affective dimensions (p < 0.005; p < 0.002; p < 0.013, respectively). All treated groups showed a decrease in functional disability (p < 0.001), but the Pulsed Ultrasound Group showed the highest relative gain (83.3%). Conclusions: The three modalities have significant effects to decreasing low back pain and improving functional disability in women with non-specific chronic low back pain, but the pulsed low-level laser had the best results on pain while the pulsed ultrasound had the best results on improve the functional disability. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02150096.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de ReumatologiaAdvances in Rheumatology v.59 20192019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2523-31062019000100243en10.1186/s42358-019-0099-z
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Rubira,Ana Paula Fernandes De Angelis
Rubira,Marcelo Custódio
Rubira,Lucas De Angelis
Comachio,Josielli
Magalhães,Maurício Oliveira
Marques,Amélia Pasqual
spellingShingle Rubira,Ana Paula Fernandes De Angelis
Rubira,Marcelo Custódio
Rubira,Lucas De Angelis
Comachio,Josielli
Magalhães,Maurício Oliveira
Marques,Amélia Pasqual
Comparison of the effects of low-level laser and pulsed and continuous ultrasound on pain and physical disability in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial
author_facet Rubira,Ana Paula Fernandes De Angelis
Rubira,Marcelo Custódio
Rubira,Lucas De Angelis
Comachio,Josielli
Magalhães,Maurício Oliveira
Marques,Amélia Pasqual
author_sort Rubira,Ana Paula Fernandes De Angelis
title Comparison of the effects of low-level laser and pulsed and continuous ultrasound on pain and physical disability in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_short Comparison of the effects of low-level laser and pulsed and continuous ultrasound on pain and physical disability in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full Comparison of the effects of low-level laser and pulsed and continuous ultrasound on pain and physical disability in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the effects of low-level laser and pulsed and continuous ultrasound on pain and physical disability in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the effects of low-level laser and pulsed and continuous ultrasound on pain and physical disability in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial
title_sort comparison of the effects of low-level laser and pulsed and continuous ultrasound on pain and physical disability in chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled clinical trial
description Abstract Objective: To compare the short-term effects of pulsed laser and pulsed and continuous ultrasound on pain and functional disability in women with chronic non-specific low back pain. Methods: The sample was composed of 100 volunteers randomly allocated into four groups: The Pulsed Laser Group (n = 26) was treated with 3 J/cm2; the Pulsed Ultrasound Group (n = 24; 3 MHz) was treated with 1 W/cm2; the Continuous Ultrasound Group (n = 26; 1 MHz) was treated with 1 W/cm2; and a Control Group (n = 24), where the patients were still waiting for treatment. Before and after 10 sessions of treatment, the intensity of pain was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the quality of pain was evaluated using the McGill pain questionnaire and functional disability was investigated using the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Results: The three treated groups exhibited a decrease in pain (p < 0.001); the Pulsed Laser Group showed the greater relative gain (91.2%), Meanwhile, the Control Group exhibited a worsening of - 5.8%. The three treated groups demonstrated improvement in the quality of pain (McGill) in the total, sensory and affective dimensions (p < 0.005; p < 0.002; p < 0.013, respectively). All treated groups showed a decrease in functional disability (p < 0.001), but the Pulsed Ultrasound Group showed the highest relative gain (83.3%). Conclusions: The three modalities have significant effects to decreasing low back pain and improving functional disability in women with non-specific chronic low back pain, but the pulsed low-level laser had the best results on pain while the pulsed ultrasound had the best results on improve the functional disability. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02150096.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia
publishDate 2019
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2523-31062019000100243
work_keys_str_mv AT rubiraanapaulafernandesdeangelis comparisonoftheeffectsoflowlevellaserandpulsedandcontinuousultrasoundonpainandphysicaldisabilityinchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT rubiramarcelocustodio comparisonoftheeffectsoflowlevellaserandpulsedandcontinuousultrasoundonpainandphysicaldisabilityinchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT rubiralucasdeangelis comparisonoftheeffectsoflowlevellaserandpulsedandcontinuousultrasoundonpainandphysicaldisabilityinchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT comachiojosielli comparisonoftheeffectsoflowlevellaserandpulsedandcontinuousultrasoundonpainandphysicaldisabilityinchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT magalhaesmauriciooliveira comparisonoftheeffectsoflowlevellaserandpulsedandcontinuousultrasoundonpainandphysicaldisabilityinchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
AT marquesameliapasqual comparisonoftheeffectsoflowlevellaserandpulsedandcontinuousultrasoundonpainandphysicaldisabilityinchronicnonspecificlowbackpainarandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrial
_version_ 1756441900956516352