Comparison of the intubation success rate between the intubating catheter and videolaryngoscope in difficult airways: a prospective randomized trial

Abstract Background: Several devices and algorithms have already been examined and compared for difficult airway management. However, there is no existing study comparing the success of the Intubating Catheter (IC) and the Videolaryngoscope (VL) in patients who are difficult to intubate. We aimed to compare Frova IC and McGrath VL in terms of intubation success rates in patients with difficult intubation. Methods: This prospective, randomized study was performed in an university hospital. Patients who underwent an operation under general anesthesia and whom airway management process was deemed difficult were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups by envelopes containing a number: the intubating catheter group (Group IC), intubated using the Frova IC, and the videolaryngoscope group (Group VL), intubated using the McGrath VL. Study data were collected by a technician who was blind to the study groups and the type of device used in the intubation procedure. Results: A total of 49 patients with difficult airway were included in the study, including 25 patients in the Frova IC Group and 24 patients in the McGrath VL Group. The rate of successful intubation was determined to be 88% in Group IC and 66% in Group VL (p = 0.074). The mean duration of intubation attempt in Group VL was 44.62 seconds, whereas in Group IC, it was 51.12 seconds (p = 0.593). Group VL was found to have a significantly lower Cormack-Lehane grade compared to Group IC (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Frova IC is a candidate to be an indispensable instrument in terms of costeffectiveness in clinics such as anesthesia and emergency medicine, where difficult intubation cases are frequently encountered. However, the combination of Frova IC and McGrath VL seems to be more successful in difficult intubation situations, so future studies should focus on using these two devices together.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ozdemirkan,Aysun, Onal,Ozkan, Ozcan,Irem Gumus, Aslanlar,Emine, Saltali,Ali, Sari,Mehmet, Ciftci,Cansu, Bayram,Hasan Huseyin
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) 2022
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2352-22912022000100055
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2352-22912022000100055
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2352-229120220001000552022-02-24Comparison of the intubation success rate between the intubating catheter and videolaryngoscope in difficult airways: a prospective randomized trialOzdemirkan,AysunOnal,OzkanOzcan,Irem GumusAslanlar,EmineSaltali,AliSari,MehmetCiftci,CansuBayram,Hasan Huseyin Airway management Catheters Equipment and supplies Intubation Intratracheal Abstract Background: Several devices and algorithms have already been examined and compared for difficult airway management. However, there is no existing study comparing the success of the Intubating Catheter (IC) and the Videolaryngoscope (VL) in patients who are difficult to intubate. We aimed to compare Frova IC and McGrath VL in terms of intubation success rates in patients with difficult intubation. Methods: This prospective, randomized study was performed in an university hospital. Patients who underwent an operation under general anesthesia and whom airway management process was deemed difficult were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups by envelopes containing a number: the intubating catheter group (Group IC), intubated using the Frova IC, and the videolaryngoscope group (Group VL), intubated using the McGrath VL. Study data were collected by a technician who was blind to the study groups and the type of device used in the intubation procedure. Results: A total of 49 patients with difficult airway were included in the study, including 25 patients in the Frova IC Group and 24 patients in the McGrath VL Group. The rate of successful intubation was determined to be 88% in Group IC and 66% in Group VL (p = 0.074). The mean duration of intubation attempt in Group VL was 44.62 seconds, whereas in Group IC, it was 51.12 seconds (p = 0.593). Group VL was found to have a significantly lower Cormack-Lehane grade compared to Group IC (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Frova IC is a candidate to be an indispensable instrument in terms of costeffectiveness in clinics such as anesthesia and emergency medicine, where difficult intubation cases are frequently encountered. However, the combination of Frova IC and McGrath VL seems to be more successful in difficult intubation situations, so future studies should focus on using these two devices together.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology v.72 n.1 20222022-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2352-22912022000100055en10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.027
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Ozdemirkan,Aysun
Onal,Ozkan
Ozcan,Irem Gumus
Aslanlar,Emine
Saltali,Ali
Sari,Mehmet
Ciftci,Cansu
Bayram,Hasan Huseyin
spellingShingle Ozdemirkan,Aysun
Onal,Ozkan
Ozcan,Irem Gumus
Aslanlar,Emine
Saltali,Ali
Sari,Mehmet
Ciftci,Cansu
Bayram,Hasan Huseyin
Comparison of the intubation success rate between the intubating catheter and videolaryngoscope in difficult airways: a prospective randomized trial
author_facet Ozdemirkan,Aysun
Onal,Ozkan
Ozcan,Irem Gumus
Aslanlar,Emine
Saltali,Ali
Sari,Mehmet
Ciftci,Cansu
Bayram,Hasan Huseyin
author_sort Ozdemirkan,Aysun
title Comparison of the intubation success rate between the intubating catheter and videolaryngoscope in difficult airways: a prospective randomized trial
title_short Comparison of the intubation success rate between the intubating catheter and videolaryngoscope in difficult airways: a prospective randomized trial
title_full Comparison of the intubation success rate between the intubating catheter and videolaryngoscope in difficult airways: a prospective randomized trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the intubation success rate between the intubating catheter and videolaryngoscope in difficult airways: a prospective randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the intubation success rate between the intubating catheter and videolaryngoscope in difficult airways: a prospective randomized trial
title_sort comparison of the intubation success rate between the intubating catheter and videolaryngoscope in difficult airways: a prospective randomized trial
description Abstract Background: Several devices and algorithms have already been examined and compared for difficult airway management. However, there is no existing study comparing the success of the Intubating Catheter (IC) and the Videolaryngoscope (VL) in patients who are difficult to intubate. We aimed to compare Frova IC and McGrath VL in terms of intubation success rates in patients with difficult intubation. Methods: This prospective, randomized study was performed in an university hospital. Patients who underwent an operation under general anesthesia and whom airway management process was deemed difficult were included in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups by envelopes containing a number: the intubating catheter group (Group IC), intubated using the Frova IC, and the videolaryngoscope group (Group VL), intubated using the McGrath VL. Study data were collected by a technician who was blind to the study groups and the type of device used in the intubation procedure. Results: A total of 49 patients with difficult airway were included in the study, including 25 patients in the Frova IC Group and 24 patients in the McGrath VL Group. The rate of successful intubation was determined to be 88% in Group IC and 66% in Group VL (p = 0.074). The mean duration of intubation attempt in Group VL was 44.62 seconds, whereas in Group IC, it was 51.12 seconds (p = 0.593). Group VL was found to have a significantly lower Cormack-Lehane grade compared to Group IC (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Frova IC is a candidate to be an indispensable instrument in terms of costeffectiveness in clinics such as anesthesia and emergency medicine, where difficult intubation cases are frequently encountered. However, the combination of Frova IC and McGrath VL seems to be more successful in difficult intubation situations, so future studies should focus on using these two devices together.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
publishDate 2022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2352-22912022000100055
work_keys_str_mv AT ozdemirkanaysun comparisonoftheintubationsuccessratebetweentheintubatingcatheterandvideolaryngoscopeindifficultairwaysaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT onalozkan comparisonoftheintubationsuccessratebetweentheintubatingcatheterandvideolaryngoscopeindifficultairwaysaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT ozcaniremgumus comparisonoftheintubationsuccessratebetweentheintubatingcatheterandvideolaryngoscopeindifficultairwaysaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT aslanlaremine comparisonoftheintubationsuccessratebetweentheintubatingcatheterandvideolaryngoscopeindifficultairwaysaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT saltaliali comparisonoftheintubationsuccessratebetweentheintubatingcatheterandvideolaryngoscopeindifficultairwaysaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT sarimehmet comparisonoftheintubationsuccessratebetweentheintubatingcatheterandvideolaryngoscopeindifficultairwaysaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT ciftcicansu comparisonoftheintubationsuccessratebetweentheintubatingcatheterandvideolaryngoscopeindifficultairwaysaprospectiverandomizedtrial
AT bayramhasanhuseyin comparisonoftheintubationsuccessratebetweentheintubatingcatheterandvideolaryngoscopeindifficultairwaysaprospectiverandomizedtrial
_version_ 1756441230458224640