Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Subepithelial Tumor Treatment in the Upper Digestive Tract: A Western, Multicenter Study

Abstract Background/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been proposed for removal of gastrointestinal sub-epithelial tumors (GI-SETs), but data are still scanty. This study aimed to report a case series from a western country. Patients and Methods: Data of patients with upper GI-SETs suitable for ESD removal observed in 4 centers were retro-spectively reviewed. Before endoscopic procedure, the lesion was characterized by endosonographic evaluation, histology, and CT scan. The en bloc resection and the R0 resection rates were calculated, as well as incidence of complications, and the 1-year follow-up was reported. Results: Data of 84 patients with esophageal (N = 13), gastric (N = 61), and duodenal (N = 10) GI-SETs were collected. The mean diameter of lesions was 26 mm (range: 12-110 mm). There were 17 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 12 neuroendocrine tumors, 35 leiomyomas, 18 lipomas, and 2 hamartomas. En bloc and R0 resection were achieved in 83 (98.8%) and in 80 (95.2%) patients, respectively. Overall, a complication occurred in 11 (13.1%) patients, including bleeding (N = 7) and perforation (N = 4). Endoscopic approach was successful in all bleedings, but 1 patient who required radiological embolization, and in 2 perforations, while surgery was performed in the other patients. Overall, a surgical approach was eventually needed in 5 (5.9%), including 3 in whom R0 resection failed and 2 with perforation. Conclusions: Our study found that ESD may be an effective and safe alternative to surgical intervention for both benign and localized malignant GI-SETs.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manta,Raffaele, Zito,Francesco Paolo, Pugliese,Francesco, Caruso,Angelo, Mangiafico,Santi, D’Alessandro,Alessandra, Castellani,Danilo, Germani,Ugo, Mutignani,Massimiliano, Conigliaro,Rita Luisa, Bonetti,Luca Reggiani, Matsuda,Takahisa, Francesco,Vincenzo De, Zullo,Angelo, Galloro,Giuseppe
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia 2023
Online Access:http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452023000200033
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2341-45452023000200033
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2341-454520230002000332023-09-06Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Subepithelial Tumor Treatment in the Upper Digestive Tract: A Western, Multicenter StudyManta,RaffaeleZito,Francesco PaoloPugliese,FrancescoCaruso,AngeloMangiafico,SantiD’Alessandro,AlessandraCastellani,DaniloGermani,UgoMutignani,MassimilianoConigliaro,Rita LuisaBonetti,Luca ReggianiMatsuda,TakahisaFrancesco,Vincenzo DeZullo,AngeloGalloro,Giuseppe Endoscopic submucosal dissection Subepithelial tumors Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Neuroendocrine tumor Upper GI Abstract Background/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been proposed for removal of gastrointestinal sub-epithelial tumors (GI-SETs), but data are still scanty. This study aimed to report a case series from a western country. Patients and Methods: Data of patients with upper GI-SETs suitable for ESD removal observed in 4 centers were retro-spectively reviewed. Before endoscopic procedure, the lesion was characterized by endosonographic evaluation, histology, and CT scan. The en bloc resection and the R0 resection rates were calculated, as well as incidence of complications, and the 1-year follow-up was reported. Results: Data of 84 patients with esophageal (N = 13), gastric (N = 61), and duodenal (N = 10) GI-SETs were collected. The mean diameter of lesions was 26 mm (range: 12-110 mm). There were 17 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 12 neuroendocrine tumors, 35 leiomyomas, 18 lipomas, and 2 hamartomas. En bloc and R0 resection were achieved in 83 (98.8%) and in 80 (95.2%) patients, respectively. Overall, a complication occurred in 11 (13.1%) patients, including bleeding (N = 7) and perforation (N = 4). Endoscopic approach was successful in all bleedings, but 1 patient who required radiological embolization, and in 2 perforations, while surgery was performed in the other patients. Overall, a surgical approach was eventually needed in 5 (5.9%), including 3 in whom R0 resection failed and 2 with perforation. Conclusions: Our study found that ESD may be an effective and safe alternative to surgical intervention for both benign and localized malignant GI-SETs.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Portuguesa de GastrenterologiaGE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology v.30 n.2 20232023-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452023000200033en10.1159/000525993
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Portugal
countrycode PT
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-pt
tag revista
region Europa del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Manta,Raffaele
Zito,Francesco Paolo
Pugliese,Francesco
Caruso,Angelo
Mangiafico,Santi
D’Alessandro,Alessandra
Castellani,Danilo
Germani,Ugo
Mutignani,Massimiliano
Conigliaro,Rita Luisa
Bonetti,Luca Reggiani
Matsuda,Takahisa
Francesco,Vincenzo De
Zullo,Angelo
Galloro,Giuseppe
spellingShingle Manta,Raffaele
Zito,Francesco Paolo
Pugliese,Francesco
Caruso,Angelo
Mangiafico,Santi
D’Alessandro,Alessandra
Castellani,Danilo
Germani,Ugo
Mutignani,Massimiliano
Conigliaro,Rita Luisa
Bonetti,Luca Reggiani
Matsuda,Takahisa
Francesco,Vincenzo De
Zullo,Angelo
Galloro,Giuseppe
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Subepithelial Tumor Treatment in the Upper Digestive Tract: A Western, Multicenter Study
author_facet Manta,Raffaele
Zito,Francesco Paolo
Pugliese,Francesco
Caruso,Angelo
Mangiafico,Santi
D’Alessandro,Alessandra
Castellani,Danilo
Germani,Ugo
Mutignani,Massimiliano
Conigliaro,Rita Luisa
Bonetti,Luca Reggiani
Matsuda,Takahisa
Francesco,Vincenzo De
Zullo,Angelo
Galloro,Giuseppe
author_sort Manta,Raffaele
title Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Subepithelial Tumor Treatment in the Upper Digestive Tract: A Western, Multicenter Study
title_short Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Subepithelial Tumor Treatment in the Upper Digestive Tract: A Western, Multicenter Study
title_full Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Subepithelial Tumor Treatment in the Upper Digestive Tract: A Western, Multicenter Study
title_fullStr Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Subepithelial Tumor Treatment in the Upper Digestive Tract: A Western, Multicenter Study
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Subepithelial Tumor Treatment in the Upper Digestive Tract: A Western, Multicenter Study
title_sort endoscopic submucosal dissection for subepithelial tumor treatment in the upper digestive tract: a western, multicenter study
description Abstract Background/Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been proposed for removal of gastrointestinal sub-epithelial tumors (GI-SETs), but data are still scanty. This study aimed to report a case series from a western country. Patients and Methods: Data of patients with upper GI-SETs suitable for ESD removal observed in 4 centers were retro-spectively reviewed. Before endoscopic procedure, the lesion was characterized by endosonographic evaluation, histology, and CT scan. The en bloc resection and the R0 resection rates were calculated, as well as incidence of complications, and the 1-year follow-up was reported. Results: Data of 84 patients with esophageal (N = 13), gastric (N = 61), and duodenal (N = 10) GI-SETs were collected. The mean diameter of lesions was 26 mm (range: 12-110 mm). There were 17 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 12 neuroendocrine tumors, 35 leiomyomas, 18 lipomas, and 2 hamartomas. En bloc and R0 resection were achieved in 83 (98.8%) and in 80 (95.2%) patients, respectively. Overall, a complication occurred in 11 (13.1%) patients, including bleeding (N = 7) and perforation (N = 4). Endoscopic approach was successful in all bleedings, but 1 patient who required radiological embolization, and in 2 perforations, while surgery was performed in the other patients. Overall, a surgical approach was eventually needed in 5 (5.9%), including 3 in whom R0 resection failed and 2 with perforation. Conclusions: Our study found that ESD may be an effective and safe alternative to surgical intervention for both benign and localized malignant GI-SETs.
publisher Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia
publishDate 2023
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2341-45452023000200033
work_keys_str_mv AT mantaraffaele endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsubepithelialtumortreatmentintheupperdigestivetractawesternmulticenterstudy
AT zitofrancescopaolo endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsubepithelialtumortreatmentintheupperdigestivetractawesternmulticenterstudy
AT pugliesefrancesco endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsubepithelialtumortreatmentintheupperdigestivetractawesternmulticenterstudy
AT carusoangelo endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsubepithelialtumortreatmentintheupperdigestivetractawesternmulticenterstudy
AT mangiaficosanti endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsubepithelialtumortreatmentintheupperdigestivetractawesternmulticenterstudy
AT dalessandroalessandra endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsubepithelialtumortreatmentintheupperdigestivetractawesternmulticenterstudy
AT castellanidanilo endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsubepithelialtumortreatmentintheupperdigestivetractawesternmulticenterstudy
AT germaniugo endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsubepithelialtumortreatmentintheupperdigestivetractawesternmulticenterstudy
AT mutignanimassimiliano endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsubepithelialtumortreatmentintheupperdigestivetractawesternmulticenterstudy
AT conigliaroritaluisa endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsubepithelialtumortreatmentintheupperdigestivetractawesternmulticenterstudy
AT bonettilucareggiani endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsubepithelialtumortreatmentintheupperdigestivetractawesternmulticenterstudy
AT matsudatakahisa endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsubepithelialtumortreatmentintheupperdigestivetractawesternmulticenterstudy
AT francescovincenzode endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsubepithelialtumortreatmentintheupperdigestivetractawesternmulticenterstudy
AT zulloangelo endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsubepithelialtumortreatmentintheupperdigestivetractawesternmulticenterstudy
AT gallorogiuseppe endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionforsubepithelialtumortreatmentintheupperdigestivetractawesternmulticenterstudy
_version_ 1777675803682668544