In search of lost “political question doctrine”: A Comment on Maimom Schwarzschild’s paper on political questions

From Maimom Schwarzschild’s analysis of the political question doctrine and the respective judicial cases’ description, a metatheoretical question immediately arises to my mind: is there truly a political question doctrine or are judges and scholars just talking about already known phenomena? In my commentary, starting from Henkin and Seidman’s analysis and resorting to legal concepts such as discretion and defeasibility, I will try to briefly address this question by assessing if some of the three possibilities arising from the Supreme Court jurisprudence as well as Ely and Bickel’s ideas can justify an autonomous political question doctrine.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sampaio,Jorge Silva
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa) 2018
Online Access:http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2018000300009
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2183-184X2018000300009
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2183-184X20180003000092019-07-23In search of lost “political question doctrine”: A Comment on Maimom Schwarzschild’s paper on political questionsSampaio,Jorge Silva Political Questions Constitutional Interpretation Normative Conflicts Defeasibility Judicial Supremacy From Maimom Schwarzschild’s analysis of the political question doctrine and the respective judicial cases’ description, a metatheoretical question immediately arises to my mind: is there truly a political question doctrine or are judges and scholars just talking about already known phenomena? In my commentary, starting from Henkin and Seidman’s analysis and resorting to legal concepts such as discretion and defeasibility, I will try to briefly address this question by assessing if some of the three possibilities arising from the Supreme Court jurisprudence as well as Ely and Bickel’s ideas can justify an autonomous political question doctrine.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa)e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público v.5 n.3 20182018-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2018000300009en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Portugal
countrycode PT
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-pt
tag revista
region Europa del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Sampaio,Jorge Silva
spellingShingle Sampaio,Jorge Silva
In search of lost “political question doctrine”: A Comment on Maimom Schwarzschild’s paper on political questions
author_facet Sampaio,Jorge Silva
author_sort Sampaio,Jorge Silva
title In search of lost “political question doctrine”: A Comment on Maimom Schwarzschild’s paper on political questions
title_short In search of lost “political question doctrine”: A Comment on Maimom Schwarzschild’s paper on political questions
title_full In search of lost “political question doctrine”: A Comment on Maimom Schwarzschild’s paper on political questions
title_fullStr In search of lost “political question doctrine”: A Comment on Maimom Schwarzschild’s paper on political questions
title_full_unstemmed In search of lost “political question doctrine”: A Comment on Maimom Schwarzschild’s paper on political questions
title_sort in search of lost “political question doctrine”: a comment on maimom schwarzschild’s paper on political questions
description From Maimom Schwarzschild’s analysis of the political question doctrine and the respective judicial cases’ description, a metatheoretical question immediately arises to my mind: is there truly a political question doctrine or are judges and scholars just talking about already known phenomena? In my commentary, starting from Henkin and Seidman’s analysis and resorting to legal concepts such as discretion and defeasibility, I will try to briefly address this question by assessing if some of the three possibilities arising from the Supreme Court jurisprudence as well as Ely and Bickel’s ideas can justify an autonomous political question doctrine.
publisher Instituto de Ciências Jurídico-Políticas (Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa)
publishDate 2018
url http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2183-184X2018000300009
work_keys_str_mv AT sampaiojorgesilva insearchoflostpoliticalquestiondoctrineacommentonmaimomschwarzschildspaperonpoliticalquestions
_version_ 1756003989531394048