Effect of Brachiaria Grass on Vegetative Development of Teak

ABSTRACT Invasive plants are a limiting factor for the establishment of planted teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) forests, especially because most of them are planted on Urochloa decumbens Stapf degraded pastures. This study evaluated initial teak development applying different control alternatives for U. decumbens . Treatments were no weed control (T1), continuous control of U. decumbens (T2), U. decumbens control after six months of competition (T3), and 60 cm control of U. decumbens around the seedlings (T4). The experiment was established in a pasture, containing U. decumbens, in May 2012. The experimental design was randomized blocks, with four treatments and four replications. Twenty two months after transplanting the seedlings, all treatments in which seedlings had to compete with any weed competition had their growth compromised. Complete control of Urochloa was the best treatment for teak growth.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Domingos Júnior,Fausto Antônio, Coelho,Lisias
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro 2018
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872018000400102
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2179-80872018000400102
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2179-808720180004001022018-07-27Effect of Brachiaria Grass on Vegetative Development of TeakDomingos Júnior,Fausto AntônioCoelho,Lisias Tectona grandis L.f. Urochloa decumbens Stapf weeds forest ABSTRACT Invasive plants are a limiting factor for the establishment of planted teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) forests, especially because most of them are planted on Urochloa decumbens Stapf degraded pastures. This study evaluated initial teak development applying different control alternatives for U. decumbens . Treatments were no weed control (T1), continuous control of U. decumbens (T2), U. decumbens control after six months of competition (T3), and 60 cm control of U. decumbens around the seedlings (T4). The experiment was established in a pasture, containing U. decumbens, in May 2012. The experimental design was randomized blocks, with four treatments and four replications. Twenty two months after transplanting the seedlings, all treatments in which seedlings had to compete with any weed competition had their growth compromised. Complete control of Urochloa was the best treatment for teak growth.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de JaneiroFloresta e Ambiente v.25 n.4 20182018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872018000400102en10.1590/2179-8087.012615
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Domingos Júnior,Fausto Antônio
Coelho,Lisias
spellingShingle Domingos Júnior,Fausto Antônio
Coelho,Lisias
Effect of Brachiaria Grass on Vegetative Development of Teak
author_facet Domingos Júnior,Fausto Antônio
Coelho,Lisias
author_sort Domingos Júnior,Fausto Antônio
title Effect of Brachiaria Grass on Vegetative Development of Teak
title_short Effect of Brachiaria Grass on Vegetative Development of Teak
title_full Effect of Brachiaria Grass on Vegetative Development of Teak
title_fullStr Effect of Brachiaria Grass on Vegetative Development of Teak
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Brachiaria Grass on Vegetative Development of Teak
title_sort effect of brachiaria grass on vegetative development of teak
description ABSTRACT Invasive plants are a limiting factor for the establishment of planted teak (Tectona grandis L.f.) forests, especially because most of them are planted on Urochloa decumbens Stapf degraded pastures. This study evaluated initial teak development applying different control alternatives for U. decumbens . Treatments were no weed control (T1), continuous control of U. decumbens (T2), U. decumbens control after six months of competition (T3), and 60 cm control of U. decumbens around the seedlings (T4). The experiment was established in a pasture, containing U. decumbens, in May 2012. The experimental design was randomized blocks, with four treatments and four replications. Twenty two months after transplanting the seedlings, all treatments in which seedlings had to compete with any weed competition had their growth compromised. Complete control of Urochloa was the best treatment for teak growth.
publisher Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
publishDate 2018
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872018000400102
work_keys_str_mv AT domingosjuniorfaustoantonio effectofbrachiariagrassonvegetativedevelopmentofteak
AT coelholisias effectofbrachiariagrassonvegetativedevelopmentofteak
_version_ 1756439336901935104