Stress distribution analysis in anterior teeth caused by several retraction mechanics

ABSTRACT Introduction: Orthodontic retraction of the anterior teeth is indicated when the patient has a malocclusion with protrusion of the incisors. Several mechanics are indicated to perform this retraction. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the strains generated by four different types of retraction mechanics along the roots of the anterior teeth. Methods: A photoelastic model simulating an arch with first premolars extraction was made. Sixty retraction archwires were prepared, including fifteen for each type of mechanics evaluated: sliding, teardrop loop spring, T-loop spring and double key loop archwire. The strains were observed in two perspectives: occlusal and oblique. In the occlusal perspective, strains were compared among the six anterior teeth. From the oblique perspective, strains were compared among the thirds of the left canine root. Results: In the occlusal perspective, the teardrop loop spring mechanics presented greater strains, followed by T-loop spring, double key loop archwire and sliding mechanics. In all mechanics, strains were more concentrated in the canines than in the incisors. From the oblique perspective, the teardrop loop mechanics generated greater strains in the cervical regions of the canine, and in the apical regions, no differences were found in strains among the four types of mechanics. In the same mechanics, greater strains were present in the cervical zones. Conclusion: The teardrop loop spring retraction mechanic presented the greatest mean strain, and the sliding retraction mechanic presented the lowest mean strain on the root of anteroinferior teeth in the occlusal and oblique perspectives.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: DOMINGOS,Rafael Golghetto, LIMA JÚNIOR,Almir, LAGANÁ,Dalva Cruz, RINO NETO,José, ABRÃO,Jorge, PAIVA,João Batista de
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Dental Press International 2021
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512021000500301
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2176-94512021000500301
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2176-945120210005003012021-10-26Stress distribution analysis in anterior teeth caused by several retraction mechanicsDOMINGOS,Rafael GolghettoLIMA JÚNIOR,AlmirLAGANÁ,Dalva CruzRINO NETO,JoséABRÃO,JorgePAIVA,João Batista de Orthodontics, corrective Tooth movement techniques Orthodontic space closure ABSTRACT Introduction: Orthodontic retraction of the anterior teeth is indicated when the patient has a malocclusion with protrusion of the incisors. Several mechanics are indicated to perform this retraction. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the strains generated by four different types of retraction mechanics along the roots of the anterior teeth. Methods: A photoelastic model simulating an arch with first premolars extraction was made. Sixty retraction archwires were prepared, including fifteen for each type of mechanics evaluated: sliding, teardrop loop spring, T-loop spring and double key loop archwire. The strains were observed in two perspectives: occlusal and oblique. In the occlusal perspective, strains were compared among the six anterior teeth. From the oblique perspective, strains were compared among the thirds of the left canine root. Results: In the occlusal perspective, the teardrop loop spring mechanics presented greater strains, followed by T-loop spring, double key loop archwire and sliding mechanics. In all mechanics, strains were more concentrated in the canines than in the incisors. From the oblique perspective, the teardrop loop mechanics generated greater strains in the cervical regions of the canine, and in the apical regions, no differences were found in strains among the four types of mechanics. In the same mechanics, greater strains were present in the cervical zones. Conclusion: The teardrop loop spring retraction mechanic presented the greatest mean strain, and the sliding retraction mechanic presented the lowest mean strain on the root of anteroinferior teeth in the occlusal and oblique perspectives.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDental Press InternationalDental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.26 n.5 20212021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512021000500301en10.1590/2177-6709.26.5.e212042.oar
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author DOMINGOS,Rafael Golghetto
LIMA JÚNIOR,Almir
LAGANÁ,Dalva Cruz
RINO NETO,José
ABRÃO,Jorge
PAIVA,João Batista de
spellingShingle DOMINGOS,Rafael Golghetto
LIMA JÚNIOR,Almir
LAGANÁ,Dalva Cruz
RINO NETO,José
ABRÃO,Jorge
PAIVA,João Batista de
Stress distribution analysis in anterior teeth caused by several retraction mechanics
author_facet DOMINGOS,Rafael Golghetto
LIMA JÚNIOR,Almir
LAGANÁ,Dalva Cruz
RINO NETO,José
ABRÃO,Jorge
PAIVA,João Batista de
author_sort DOMINGOS,Rafael Golghetto
title Stress distribution analysis in anterior teeth caused by several retraction mechanics
title_short Stress distribution analysis in anterior teeth caused by several retraction mechanics
title_full Stress distribution analysis in anterior teeth caused by several retraction mechanics
title_fullStr Stress distribution analysis in anterior teeth caused by several retraction mechanics
title_full_unstemmed Stress distribution analysis in anterior teeth caused by several retraction mechanics
title_sort stress distribution analysis in anterior teeth caused by several retraction mechanics
description ABSTRACT Introduction: Orthodontic retraction of the anterior teeth is indicated when the patient has a malocclusion with protrusion of the incisors. Several mechanics are indicated to perform this retraction. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the strains generated by four different types of retraction mechanics along the roots of the anterior teeth. Methods: A photoelastic model simulating an arch with first premolars extraction was made. Sixty retraction archwires were prepared, including fifteen for each type of mechanics evaluated: sliding, teardrop loop spring, T-loop spring and double key loop archwire. The strains were observed in two perspectives: occlusal and oblique. In the occlusal perspective, strains were compared among the six anterior teeth. From the oblique perspective, strains were compared among the thirds of the left canine root. Results: In the occlusal perspective, the teardrop loop spring mechanics presented greater strains, followed by T-loop spring, double key loop archwire and sliding mechanics. In all mechanics, strains were more concentrated in the canines than in the incisors. From the oblique perspective, the teardrop loop mechanics generated greater strains in the cervical regions of the canine, and in the apical regions, no differences were found in strains among the four types of mechanics. In the same mechanics, greater strains were present in the cervical zones. Conclusion: The teardrop loop spring retraction mechanic presented the greatest mean strain, and the sliding retraction mechanic presented the lowest mean strain on the root of anteroinferior teeth in the occlusal and oblique perspectives.
publisher Dental Press International
publishDate 2021
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512021000500301
work_keys_str_mv AT domingosrafaelgolghetto stressdistributionanalysisinanteriorteethcausedbyseveralretractionmechanics
AT limajunioralmir stressdistributionanalysisinanteriorteethcausedbyseveralretractionmechanics
AT laganadalvacruz stressdistributionanalysisinanteriorteethcausedbyseveralretractionmechanics
AT rinonetojose stressdistributionanalysisinanteriorteethcausedbyseveralretractionmechanics
AT abraojorge stressdistributionanalysisinanteriorteethcausedbyseveralretractionmechanics
AT paivajoaobatistade stressdistributionanalysisinanteriorteethcausedbyseveralretractionmechanics
_version_ 1756439069552803840