Attractiveness of different esthetic orthodontic wires

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the attractiveness of different types of esthetic orthodontic wires by laypeople and dentists. Methods: Five different types of orthodontic wires were evaluated: three esthetic wires (Teflon-coated, epoxy resin-coated and rhodium-coated wires), and two metallic wires (stainless steel and NiTi), as control. Monocrystalline ceramic brackets were installed in the maxillary arch of a patient presenting good dental alignment. The five evaluated wires were attached to the orthodontic appliance with an esthetic silicone elastic and photographed. The photographs were evaluated by 163 individuals, 110 dentists and 53 laypeople. The data were statistically evaluated by two-way ANOVA and one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey tests. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the attractiveness among the wires evaluated; the most esthetic was the rhodium-coated wire, followed by the epoxy resin-coated wire and, finally, the Teflon-coated wire, with no significant difference from the stainless steel and NiTi control archwires. There was no significant difference between the groups of evaluators. Conclusion: The most attractive was the rhodium-coated wire, followed by the epoxy resin-coated wire and, finally, the least attractive wire was the Teflon-coated wire, without statistically significant difference to the stainless steel and NiTi wires, used as control.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Batista,Deric Meschiari, Faccini,Melissa, Valarelli,Fabricio Pinelli, Cançado,Rodrigo Hermont, Oliveira,Renata Cristina, Oliveira,Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de, Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Dental Press International 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512020000600027
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2176-94512020000600027
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2176-945120200006000272021-01-18Attractiveness of different esthetic orthodontic wiresBatista,Deric MeschiariFaccini,MelissaValarelli,Fabricio PinelliCançado,Rodrigo HermontOliveira,Renata CristinaOliveira,Ricardo Cesar Gobbi deFreitas,Karina Maria Salvatore Orthodontic wires Esthetics Orthodontics ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the attractiveness of different types of esthetic orthodontic wires by laypeople and dentists. Methods: Five different types of orthodontic wires were evaluated: three esthetic wires (Teflon-coated, epoxy resin-coated and rhodium-coated wires), and two metallic wires (stainless steel and NiTi), as control. Monocrystalline ceramic brackets were installed in the maxillary arch of a patient presenting good dental alignment. The five evaluated wires were attached to the orthodontic appliance with an esthetic silicone elastic and photographed. The photographs were evaluated by 163 individuals, 110 dentists and 53 laypeople. The data were statistically evaluated by two-way ANOVA and one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey tests. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the attractiveness among the wires evaluated; the most esthetic was the rhodium-coated wire, followed by the epoxy resin-coated wire and, finally, the Teflon-coated wire, with no significant difference from the stainless steel and NiTi control archwires. There was no significant difference between the groups of evaluators. Conclusion: The most attractive was the rhodium-coated wire, followed by the epoxy resin-coated wire and, finally, the least attractive wire was the Teflon-coated wire, without statistically significant difference to the stainless steel and NiTi wires, used as control.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDental Press InternationalDental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.25 n.6 20202020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512020000600027en10.1590/2177-6709.25.6.027-032.oar
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Batista,Deric Meschiari
Faccini,Melissa
Valarelli,Fabricio Pinelli
Cançado,Rodrigo Hermont
Oliveira,Renata Cristina
Oliveira,Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de
Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore
spellingShingle Batista,Deric Meschiari
Faccini,Melissa
Valarelli,Fabricio Pinelli
Cançado,Rodrigo Hermont
Oliveira,Renata Cristina
Oliveira,Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de
Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore
Attractiveness of different esthetic orthodontic wires
author_facet Batista,Deric Meschiari
Faccini,Melissa
Valarelli,Fabricio Pinelli
Cançado,Rodrigo Hermont
Oliveira,Renata Cristina
Oliveira,Ricardo Cesar Gobbi de
Freitas,Karina Maria Salvatore
author_sort Batista,Deric Meschiari
title Attractiveness of different esthetic orthodontic wires
title_short Attractiveness of different esthetic orthodontic wires
title_full Attractiveness of different esthetic orthodontic wires
title_fullStr Attractiveness of different esthetic orthodontic wires
title_full_unstemmed Attractiveness of different esthetic orthodontic wires
title_sort attractiveness of different esthetic orthodontic wires
description ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the attractiveness of different types of esthetic orthodontic wires by laypeople and dentists. Methods: Five different types of orthodontic wires were evaluated: three esthetic wires (Teflon-coated, epoxy resin-coated and rhodium-coated wires), and two metallic wires (stainless steel and NiTi), as control. Monocrystalline ceramic brackets were installed in the maxillary arch of a patient presenting good dental alignment. The five evaluated wires were attached to the orthodontic appliance with an esthetic silicone elastic and photographed. The photographs were evaluated by 163 individuals, 110 dentists and 53 laypeople. The data were statistically evaluated by two-way ANOVA and one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey tests. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the attractiveness among the wires evaluated; the most esthetic was the rhodium-coated wire, followed by the epoxy resin-coated wire and, finally, the Teflon-coated wire, with no significant difference from the stainless steel and NiTi control archwires. There was no significant difference between the groups of evaluators. Conclusion: The most attractive was the rhodium-coated wire, followed by the epoxy resin-coated wire and, finally, the least attractive wire was the Teflon-coated wire, without statistically significant difference to the stainless steel and NiTi wires, used as control.
publisher Dental Press International
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512020000600027
work_keys_str_mv AT batistadericmeschiari attractivenessofdifferentestheticorthodonticwires
AT faccinimelissa attractivenessofdifferentestheticorthodonticwires
AT valarellifabriciopinelli attractivenessofdifferentestheticorthodonticwires
AT cancadorodrigohermont attractivenessofdifferentestheticorthodonticwires
AT oliveirarenatacristina attractivenessofdifferentestheticorthodonticwires
AT oliveiraricardocesargobbide attractivenessofdifferentestheticorthodonticwires
AT freitaskarinamariasalvatore attractivenessofdifferentestheticorthodonticwires
_version_ 1756439062038708224