Facial profile esthetics in operated children with bilateral cleft lip and palate

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the facial profile esthetics of rehabilitated children with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), comparing the judgment of professionals related and not related to cleft rehabilitation and laypersons. Methods: Thirty children in the mixed dentition (24 male; 6 female) with a mean age of 7.8 years were evaluated using facial profile photographs by 25 examiners: 5 orthodontists and 5 plastic surgeons with experience in cleft care, 5 orthodontists and 5 plastic surgeons without experience in oral cleft rehabilitation and 5 graduated laymen. Their facial profiles were classified into esthetically unpleasant (grade 1 to 3), esthetically acceptable (grade 4 to 6), and esthetically pleasant (grade 7 to 9). Intraexaminer and interexaminer errors were evaluated using Spearman correlation coefficient and Kendall’s test, respectively. Inter-rater differences were analyzed using Friedman test and Student-Newman-Keuls test for multiple comparisons. Results: Orthodontists dealing with oral clefts rehabilitation considered the majority of the sample as esthetically pleasant. Plastic surgeons of the cleft team and laypersons classified most of the sample as esthetically acceptable. Most of the orthodontists and plastic surgeons not related to cleft care evaluated the facial profile as esthetically unpleasant. The structures associated to unpleasant profiles were the nose, the midface and the upper lip. Conclusions: The facial profile of children with BCLP was classified as esthetically acceptable by laypersons. Professionals related to cleft rehabilitation were more lenient and those not related to cleft care were stricter to facial esthetics than laypersons.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauris,Rita de Cássia Moura Carvalho, Capelozza Filho,Leopoldino, Calil,Louise Resti, Lauris,José Roberto Pereira, Janson,Guilherme, Garib,Daniela Gamba
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Dental Press International 2017
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512017000400041
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2176-94512017000400041
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2176-945120170004000412017-09-18Facial profile esthetics in operated children with bilateral cleft lip and palateLauris,Rita de Cássia Moura CarvalhoCapelozza Filho,LeopoldinoCalil,Louise RestiLauris,José Roberto PereiraJanson,GuilhermeGarib,Daniela Gamba Cleft lip Cleft palate Esthetics Rehabilitation. ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the facial profile esthetics of rehabilitated children with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), comparing the judgment of professionals related and not related to cleft rehabilitation and laypersons. Methods: Thirty children in the mixed dentition (24 male; 6 female) with a mean age of 7.8 years were evaluated using facial profile photographs by 25 examiners: 5 orthodontists and 5 plastic surgeons with experience in cleft care, 5 orthodontists and 5 plastic surgeons without experience in oral cleft rehabilitation and 5 graduated laymen. Their facial profiles were classified into esthetically unpleasant (grade 1 to 3), esthetically acceptable (grade 4 to 6), and esthetically pleasant (grade 7 to 9). Intraexaminer and interexaminer errors were evaluated using Spearman correlation coefficient and Kendall’s test, respectively. Inter-rater differences were analyzed using Friedman test and Student-Newman-Keuls test for multiple comparisons. Results: Orthodontists dealing with oral clefts rehabilitation considered the majority of the sample as esthetically pleasant. Plastic surgeons of the cleft team and laypersons classified most of the sample as esthetically acceptable. Most of the orthodontists and plastic surgeons not related to cleft care evaluated the facial profile as esthetically unpleasant. The structures associated to unpleasant profiles were the nose, the midface and the upper lip. Conclusions: The facial profile of children with BCLP was classified as esthetically acceptable by laypersons. Professionals related to cleft rehabilitation were more lenient and those not related to cleft care were stricter to facial esthetics than laypersons.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDental Press InternationalDental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.22 n.4 20172017-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512017000400041en10.1590/2177-6709.22.4.041-046.oar
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Lauris,Rita de Cássia Moura Carvalho
Capelozza Filho,Leopoldino
Calil,Louise Resti
Lauris,José Roberto Pereira
Janson,Guilherme
Garib,Daniela Gamba
spellingShingle Lauris,Rita de Cássia Moura Carvalho
Capelozza Filho,Leopoldino
Calil,Louise Resti
Lauris,José Roberto Pereira
Janson,Guilherme
Garib,Daniela Gamba
Facial profile esthetics in operated children with bilateral cleft lip and palate
author_facet Lauris,Rita de Cássia Moura Carvalho
Capelozza Filho,Leopoldino
Calil,Louise Resti
Lauris,José Roberto Pereira
Janson,Guilherme
Garib,Daniela Gamba
author_sort Lauris,Rita de Cássia Moura Carvalho
title Facial profile esthetics in operated children with bilateral cleft lip and palate
title_short Facial profile esthetics in operated children with bilateral cleft lip and palate
title_full Facial profile esthetics in operated children with bilateral cleft lip and palate
title_fullStr Facial profile esthetics in operated children with bilateral cleft lip and palate
title_full_unstemmed Facial profile esthetics in operated children with bilateral cleft lip and palate
title_sort facial profile esthetics in operated children with bilateral cleft lip and palate
description ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the facial profile esthetics of rehabilitated children with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), comparing the judgment of professionals related and not related to cleft rehabilitation and laypersons. Methods: Thirty children in the mixed dentition (24 male; 6 female) with a mean age of 7.8 years were evaluated using facial profile photographs by 25 examiners: 5 orthodontists and 5 plastic surgeons with experience in cleft care, 5 orthodontists and 5 plastic surgeons without experience in oral cleft rehabilitation and 5 graduated laymen. Their facial profiles were classified into esthetically unpleasant (grade 1 to 3), esthetically acceptable (grade 4 to 6), and esthetically pleasant (grade 7 to 9). Intraexaminer and interexaminer errors were evaluated using Spearman correlation coefficient and Kendall’s test, respectively. Inter-rater differences were analyzed using Friedman test and Student-Newman-Keuls test for multiple comparisons. Results: Orthodontists dealing with oral clefts rehabilitation considered the majority of the sample as esthetically pleasant. Plastic surgeons of the cleft team and laypersons classified most of the sample as esthetically acceptable. Most of the orthodontists and plastic surgeons not related to cleft care evaluated the facial profile as esthetically unpleasant. The structures associated to unpleasant profiles were the nose, the midface and the upper lip. Conclusions: The facial profile of children with BCLP was classified as esthetically acceptable by laypersons. Professionals related to cleft rehabilitation were more lenient and those not related to cleft care were stricter to facial esthetics than laypersons.
publisher Dental Press International
publishDate 2017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512017000400041
work_keys_str_mv AT laurisritadecassiamouracarvalho facialprofileestheticsinoperatedchildrenwithbilateralcleftlipandpalate
AT capelozzafilholeopoldino facialprofileestheticsinoperatedchildrenwithbilateralcleftlipandpalate
AT calillouiseresti facialprofileestheticsinoperatedchildrenwithbilateralcleftlipandpalate
AT laurisjoserobertopereira facialprofileestheticsinoperatedchildrenwithbilateralcleftlipandpalate
AT jansonguilherme facialprofileestheticsinoperatedchildrenwithbilateralcleftlipandpalate
AT garibdanielagamba facialprofileestheticsinoperatedchildrenwithbilateralcleftlipandpalate
_version_ 1756439030967304192