Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dental effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in cleft patients using two types of expanders. Methods: Twenty unilateral cleft lip and palate patients were randomly divided into two groups, according to the type of expander used: (I) modified Hyrax and (II) inverted Mini-Hyrax. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomographic image (T0) was taken as part of the initial orthodontic records and three months after RME, for bone graft planning (T1). Results: In general, there was no significant difference among groups (p > 0.05). Both showed a significant transverse maxillary expansion (p < 0.05) and no significant forward and/or downward movement of the maxilla (p > 0.05). There was greater dental crown than apical expansion. Maxillary posterior expansion tended to be larger than anterior opening (p < 0.05). Cleft and non-cleft sides were symmetrically expanded and there was no difference in dental tipping between both sides (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The appliances tested are effective in the transverse expansion of the maxilla. However, these appliances should be better indicated to cleft cases also presenting posterior transverse discrepancy, since there was greater expansion in the posterior maxillary region than in the anterior one.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Figueiredo,Daniel Santos Fonseca, Cardinal,Lucas, Bartolomeo,Flávia Uchôa Costa, Palomo,Juan Martin, Horta,Martinho Campolina Rebello, Andrade Jr,Ildeu, Oliveira,Dauro Douglas
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Dental Press International 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000600082
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2176-94512016000600082
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2176-945120160006000822017-02-17Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expandersFigueiredo,Daniel Santos FonsecaCardinal,LucasBartolomeo,Flávia Uchôa CostaPalomo,Juan MartinHorta,Martinho Campolina RebelloAndrade Jr,IldeuOliveira,Dauro Douglas Palatal expansion technique Cleft palate Cone-beam computed tomography ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dental effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in cleft patients using two types of expanders. Methods: Twenty unilateral cleft lip and palate patients were randomly divided into two groups, according to the type of expander used: (I) modified Hyrax and (II) inverted Mini-Hyrax. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomographic image (T0) was taken as part of the initial orthodontic records and three months after RME, for bone graft planning (T1). Results: In general, there was no significant difference among groups (p > 0.05). Both showed a significant transverse maxillary expansion (p < 0.05) and no significant forward and/or downward movement of the maxilla (p > 0.05). There was greater dental crown than apical expansion. Maxillary posterior expansion tended to be larger than anterior opening (p < 0.05). Cleft and non-cleft sides were symmetrically expanded and there was no difference in dental tipping between both sides (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The appliances tested are effective in the transverse expansion of the maxilla. However, these appliances should be better indicated to cleft cases also presenting posterior transverse discrepancy, since there was greater expansion in the posterior maxillary region than in the anterior one.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDental Press InternationalDental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.21 n.6 20162016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000600082en10.1590/2177-6709.2016-001.aop
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Figueiredo,Daniel Santos Fonseca
Cardinal,Lucas
Bartolomeo,Flávia Uchôa Costa
Palomo,Juan Martin
Horta,Martinho Campolina Rebello
Andrade Jr,Ildeu
Oliveira,Dauro Douglas
spellingShingle Figueiredo,Daniel Santos Fonseca
Cardinal,Lucas
Bartolomeo,Flávia Uchôa Costa
Palomo,Juan Martin
Horta,Martinho Campolina Rebello
Andrade Jr,Ildeu
Oliveira,Dauro Douglas
Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders
author_facet Figueiredo,Daniel Santos Fonseca
Cardinal,Lucas
Bartolomeo,Flávia Uchôa Costa
Palomo,Juan Martin
Horta,Martinho Campolina Rebello
Andrade Jr,Ildeu
Oliveira,Dauro Douglas
author_sort Figueiredo,Daniel Santos Fonseca
title Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders
title_short Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders
title_full Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders
title_fullStr Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders
title_full_unstemmed Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders
title_sort effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders
description ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dental effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in cleft patients using two types of expanders. Methods: Twenty unilateral cleft lip and palate patients were randomly divided into two groups, according to the type of expander used: (I) modified Hyrax and (II) inverted Mini-Hyrax. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomographic image (T0) was taken as part of the initial orthodontic records and three months after RME, for bone graft planning (T1). Results: In general, there was no significant difference among groups (p > 0.05). Both showed a significant transverse maxillary expansion (p < 0.05) and no significant forward and/or downward movement of the maxilla (p > 0.05). There was greater dental crown than apical expansion. Maxillary posterior expansion tended to be larger than anterior opening (p < 0.05). Cleft and non-cleft sides were symmetrically expanded and there was no difference in dental tipping between both sides (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The appliances tested are effective in the transverse expansion of the maxilla. However, these appliances should be better indicated to cleft cases also presenting posterior transverse discrepancy, since there was greater expansion in the posterior maxillary region than in the anterior one.
publisher Dental Press International
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000600082
work_keys_str_mv AT figueiredodanielsantosfonseca effectsofrapidmaxillaryexpansionincleftpatientsresultingfromtheuseoftwodifferentexpanders
AT cardinallucas effectsofrapidmaxillaryexpansionincleftpatientsresultingfromtheuseoftwodifferentexpanders
AT bartolomeoflaviauchoacosta effectsofrapidmaxillaryexpansionincleftpatientsresultingfromtheuseoftwodifferentexpanders
AT palomojuanmartin effectsofrapidmaxillaryexpansionincleftpatientsresultingfromtheuseoftwodifferentexpanders
AT hortamartinhocampolinarebello effectsofrapidmaxillaryexpansionincleftpatientsresultingfromtheuseoftwodifferentexpanders
AT andradejrildeu effectsofrapidmaxillaryexpansionincleftpatientsresultingfromtheuseoftwodifferentexpanders
AT oliveiradaurodouglas effectsofrapidmaxillaryexpansionincleftpatientsresultingfromtheuseoftwodifferentexpanders
_version_ 1756439024057188352