Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders
ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dental effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in cleft patients using two types of expanders. Methods: Twenty unilateral cleft lip and palate patients were randomly divided into two groups, according to the type of expander used: (I) modified Hyrax and (II) inverted Mini-Hyrax. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomographic image (T0) was taken as part of the initial orthodontic records and three months after RME, for bone graft planning (T1). Results: In general, there was no significant difference among groups (p > 0.05). Both showed a significant transverse maxillary expansion (p < 0.05) and no significant forward and/or downward movement of the maxilla (p > 0.05). There was greater dental crown than apical expansion. Maxillary posterior expansion tended to be larger than anterior opening (p < 0.05). Cleft and non-cleft sides were symmetrically expanded and there was no difference in dental tipping between both sides (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The appliances tested are effective in the transverse expansion of the maxilla. However, these appliances should be better indicated to cleft cases also presenting posterior transverse discrepancy, since there was greater expansion in the posterior maxillary region than in the anterior one.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dental Press International
2016
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000600082 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S2176-94512016000600082 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S2176-945120160006000822017-02-17Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expandersFigueiredo,Daniel Santos FonsecaCardinal,LucasBartolomeo,Flávia Uchôa CostaPalomo,Juan MartinHorta,Martinho Campolina RebelloAndrade Jr,IldeuOliveira,Dauro Douglas Palatal expansion technique Cleft palate Cone-beam computed tomography ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dental effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in cleft patients using two types of expanders. Methods: Twenty unilateral cleft lip and palate patients were randomly divided into two groups, according to the type of expander used: (I) modified Hyrax and (II) inverted Mini-Hyrax. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomographic image (T0) was taken as part of the initial orthodontic records and three months after RME, for bone graft planning (T1). Results: In general, there was no significant difference among groups (p > 0.05). Both showed a significant transverse maxillary expansion (p < 0.05) and no significant forward and/or downward movement of the maxilla (p > 0.05). There was greater dental crown than apical expansion. Maxillary posterior expansion tended to be larger than anterior opening (p < 0.05). Cleft and non-cleft sides were symmetrically expanded and there was no difference in dental tipping between both sides (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The appliances tested are effective in the transverse expansion of the maxilla. However, these appliances should be better indicated to cleft cases also presenting posterior transverse discrepancy, since there was greater expansion in the posterior maxillary region than in the anterior one.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDental Press InternationalDental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.21 n.6 20162016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000600082en10.1590/2177-6709.2016-001.aop |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Figueiredo,Daniel Santos Fonseca Cardinal,Lucas Bartolomeo,Flávia Uchôa Costa Palomo,Juan Martin Horta,Martinho Campolina Rebello Andrade Jr,Ildeu Oliveira,Dauro Douglas |
spellingShingle |
Figueiredo,Daniel Santos Fonseca Cardinal,Lucas Bartolomeo,Flávia Uchôa Costa Palomo,Juan Martin Horta,Martinho Campolina Rebello Andrade Jr,Ildeu Oliveira,Dauro Douglas Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders |
author_facet |
Figueiredo,Daniel Santos Fonseca Cardinal,Lucas Bartolomeo,Flávia Uchôa Costa Palomo,Juan Martin Horta,Martinho Campolina Rebello Andrade Jr,Ildeu Oliveira,Dauro Douglas |
author_sort |
Figueiredo,Daniel Santos Fonseca |
title |
Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders |
title_short |
Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders |
title_full |
Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders |
title_fullStr |
Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders |
title_full_unstemmed |
Effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders |
title_sort |
effects of rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients resulting from the use of two different expanders |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dental effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) in cleft patients using two types of expanders. Methods: Twenty unilateral cleft lip and palate patients were randomly divided into two groups, according to the type of expander used: (I) modified Hyrax and (II) inverted Mini-Hyrax. A pretreatment cone-beam computed tomographic image (T0) was taken as part of the initial orthodontic records and three months after RME, for bone graft planning (T1). Results: In general, there was no significant difference among groups (p > 0.05). Both showed a significant transverse maxillary expansion (p < 0.05) and no significant forward and/or downward movement of the maxilla (p > 0.05). There was greater dental crown than apical expansion. Maxillary posterior expansion tended to be larger than anterior opening (p < 0.05). Cleft and non-cleft sides were symmetrically expanded and there was no difference in dental tipping between both sides (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The appliances tested are effective in the transverse expansion of the maxilla. However, these appliances should be better indicated to cleft cases also presenting posterior transverse discrepancy, since there was greater expansion in the posterior maxillary region than in the anterior one. |
publisher |
Dental Press International |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000600082 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT figueiredodanielsantosfonseca effectsofrapidmaxillaryexpansionincleftpatientsresultingfromtheuseoftwodifferentexpanders AT cardinallucas effectsofrapidmaxillaryexpansionincleftpatientsresultingfromtheuseoftwodifferentexpanders AT bartolomeoflaviauchoacosta effectsofrapidmaxillaryexpansionincleftpatientsresultingfromtheuseoftwodifferentexpanders AT palomojuanmartin effectsofrapidmaxillaryexpansionincleftpatientsresultingfromtheuseoftwodifferentexpanders AT hortamartinhocampolinarebello effectsofrapidmaxillaryexpansionincleftpatientsresultingfromtheuseoftwodifferentexpanders AT andradejrildeu effectsofrapidmaxillaryexpansionincleftpatientsresultingfromtheuseoftwodifferentexpanders AT oliveiradaurodouglas effectsofrapidmaxillaryexpansionincleftpatientsresultingfromtheuseoftwodifferentexpanders |
_version_ |
1756439024057188352 |