Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the equivalent and effective doses of different digital radiographic methods (panoramic, lateral cephalometric and periapical) with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: Precalibrated thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 24 locations in an anthropomorphic phantom (Alderson Rando Phantom, Alderson Research Laboratories, New York, NY, USA), representing a medium sized adult. The following devices were tested: Heliodent Plus (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany), Orthophos XG 5 (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany) and i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA, USA). The equivalent doses and effective doses were calculated considering the recommendations of the International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) issued in 1990 and 2007. Results: Although the effective dose of the radiographic set corresponded to 17.5% (ICRP 1990) and 47.2% (ICRP 2007) of the CBCT dose, the equivalent doses of skin, bone surface and muscle obtained by the radiographic set were higher when compared to CBCT. However, in some areas, the radiation produced by the orthodontic set was higher due to the complete periapical examination. Conclusion: Considering the optimization principle of radiation protection, i-CAT tomography should be used only in specific and justified circumstances. Additionally, following the ALARA principle, single periapical radiographies covering restricted areas are more suitable than the complete periapical examination.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chinem,Lillian Atsumi Simabuguro, Vilella,Beatriz de Souza, Maurício,Cláudia Lúcia de Pinho, Canevaro,Lucia Viviana, Deluiz,Luiz Fernando, Vilella,Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Dental Press International 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000400066
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2176-94512016000400066
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2176-945120160004000662016-09-19Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective doseChinem,Lillian Atsumi SimabuguroVilella,Beatriz de SouzaMaurício,Cláudia Lúcia de PinhoCanevaro,Lucia VivianaDeluiz,Luiz FernandoVilella,Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Cone-beam computed tomography Digital radiograph Radiation dose. ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the equivalent and effective doses of different digital radiographic methods (panoramic, lateral cephalometric and periapical) with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: Precalibrated thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 24 locations in an anthropomorphic phantom (Alderson Rando Phantom, Alderson Research Laboratories, New York, NY, USA), representing a medium sized adult. The following devices were tested: Heliodent Plus (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany), Orthophos XG 5 (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany) and i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA, USA). The equivalent doses and effective doses were calculated considering the recommendations of the International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) issued in 1990 and 2007. Results: Although the effective dose of the radiographic set corresponded to 17.5% (ICRP 1990) and 47.2% (ICRP 2007) of the CBCT dose, the equivalent doses of skin, bone surface and muscle obtained by the radiographic set were higher when compared to CBCT. However, in some areas, the radiation produced by the orthodontic set was higher due to the complete periapical examination. Conclusion: Considering the optimization principle of radiation protection, i-CAT tomography should be used only in specific and justified circumstances. Additionally, following the ALARA principle, single periapical radiographies covering restricted areas are more suitable than the complete periapical examination.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDental Press InternationalDental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.21 n.4 20162016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000400066en10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.066-072.oar
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Chinem,Lillian Atsumi Simabuguro
Vilella,Beatriz de Souza
Maurício,Cláudia Lúcia de Pinho
Canevaro,Lucia Viviana
Deluiz,Luiz Fernando
Vilella,Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
spellingShingle Chinem,Lillian Atsumi Simabuguro
Vilella,Beatriz de Souza
Maurício,Cláudia Lúcia de Pinho
Canevaro,Lucia Viviana
Deluiz,Luiz Fernando
Vilella,Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose
author_facet Chinem,Lillian Atsumi Simabuguro
Vilella,Beatriz de Souza
Maurício,Cláudia Lúcia de Pinho
Canevaro,Lucia Viviana
Deluiz,Luiz Fernando
Vilella,Oswaldo de Vasconcellos
author_sort Chinem,Lillian Atsumi Simabuguro
title Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose
title_short Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose
title_full Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose
title_fullStr Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose
title_full_unstemmed Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose
title_sort digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose
description ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the equivalent and effective doses of different digital radiographic methods (panoramic, lateral cephalometric and periapical) with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: Precalibrated thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 24 locations in an anthropomorphic phantom (Alderson Rando Phantom, Alderson Research Laboratories, New York, NY, USA), representing a medium sized adult. The following devices were tested: Heliodent Plus (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany), Orthophos XG 5 (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany) and i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA, USA). The equivalent doses and effective doses were calculated considering the recommendations of the International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) issued in 1990 and 2007. Results: Although the effective dose of the radiographic set corresponded to 17.5% (ICRP 1990) and 47.2% (ICRP 2007) of the CBCT dose, the equivalent doses of skin, bone surface and muscle obtained by the radiographic set were higher when compared to CBCT. However, in some areas, the radiation produced by the orthodontic set was higher due to the complete periapical examination. Conclusion: Considering the optimization principle of radiation protection, i-CAT tomography should be used only in specific and justified circumstances. Additionally, following the ALARA principle, single periapical radiographies covering restricted areas are more suitable than the complete periapical examination.
publisher Dental Press International
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000400066
work_keys_str_mv AT chinemlillianatsumisimabuguro digitalorthodonticradiographicsetversusconebeamcomputedtomographyanevaluationoftheeffectivedose
AT vilellabeatrizdesouza digitalorthodonticradiographicsetversusconebeamcomputedtomographyanevaluationoftheeffectivedose
AT mauricioclaudialuciadepinho digitalorthodonticradiographicsetversusconebeamcomputedtomographyanevaluationoftheeffectivedose
AT canevaroluciaviviana digitalorthodonticradiographicsetversusconebeamcomputedtomographyanevaluationoftheeffectivedose
AT deluizluizfernando digitalorthodonticradiographicsetversusconebeamcomputedtomographyanevaluationoftheeffectivedose
AT vilellaoswaldodevasconcellos digitalorthodonticradiographicsetversusconebeamcomputedtomographyanevaluationoftheeffectivedose
_version_ 1756439020087279616