Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose
ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the equivalent and effective doses of different digital radiographic methods (panoramic, lateral cephalometric and periapical) with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: Precalibrated thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 24 locations in an anthropomorphic phantom (Alderson Rando Phantom, Alderson Research Laboratories, New York, NY, USA), representing a medium sized adult. The following devices were tested: Heliodent Plus (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany), Orthophos XG 5 (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany) and i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA, USA). The equivalent doses and effective doses were calculated considering the recommendations of the International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) issued in 1990 and 2007. Results: Although the effective dose of the radiographic set corresponded to 17.5% (ICRP 1990) and 47.2% (ICRP 2007) of the CBCT dose, the equivalent doses of skin, bone surface and muscle obtained by the radiographic set were higher when compared to CBCT. However, in some areas, the radiation produced by the orthodontic set was higher due to the complete periapical examination. Conclusion: Considering the optimization principle of radiation protection, i-CAT tomography should be used only in specific and justified circumstances. Additionally, following the ALARA principle, single periapical radiographies covering restricted areas are more suitable than the complete periapical examination.
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Dental Press International
2016
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000400066 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S2176-94512016000400066 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S2176-945120160004000662016-09-19Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective doseChinem,Lillian Atsumi SimabuguroVilella,Beatriz de SouzaMaurício,Cláudia Lúcia de PinhoCanevaro,Lucia VivianaDeluiz,Luiz FernandoVilella,Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Cone-beam computed tomography Digital radiograph Radiation dose. ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the equivalent and effective doses of different digital radiographic methods (panoramic, lateral cephalometric and periapical) with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: Precalibrated thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 24 locations in an anthropomorphic phantom (Alderson Rando Phantom, Alderson Research Laboratories, New York, NY, USA), representing a medium sized adult. The following devices were tested: Heliodent Plus (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany), Orthophos XG 5 (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany) and i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA, USA). The equivalent doses and effective doses were calculated considering the recommendations of the International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) issued in 1990 and 2007. Results: Although the effective dose of the radiographic set corresponded to 17.5% (ICRP 1990) and 47.2% (ICRP 2007) of the CBCT dose, the equivalent doses of skin, bone surface and muscle obtained by the radiographic set were higher when compared to CBCT. However, in some areas, the radiation produced by the orthodontic set was higher due to the complete periapical examination. Conclusion: Considering the optimization principle of radiation protection, i-CAT tomography should be used only in specific and justified circumstances. Additionally, following the ALARA principle, single periapical radiographies covering restricted areas are more suitable than the complete periapical examination.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDental Press InternationalDental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.21 n.4 20162016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000400066en10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.066-072.oar |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Chinem,Lillian Atsumi Simabuguro Vilella,Beatriz de Souza Maurício,Cláudia Lúcia de Pinho Canevaro,Lucia Viviana Deluiz,Luiz Fernando Vilella,Oswaldo de Vasconcellos |
spellingShingle |
Chinem,Lillian Atsumi Simabuguro Vilella,Beatriz de Souza Maurício,Cláudia Lúcia de Pinho Canevaro,Lucia Viviana Deluiz,Luiz Fernando Vilella,Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose |
author_facet |
Chinem,Lillian Atsumi Simabuguro Vilella,Beatriz de Souza Maurício,Cláudia Lúcia de Pinho Canevaro,Lucia Viviana Deluiz,Luiz Fernando Vilella,Oswaldo de Vasconcellos |
author_sort |
Chinem,Lillian Atsumi Simabuguro |
title |
Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose |
title_short |
Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose |
title_full |
Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose |
title_fullStr |
Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose |
title_full_unstemmed |
Digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose |
title_sort |
digital orthodontic radiographic set versus cone-beam computed tomography: an evaluation of the effective dose |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the equivalent and effective doses of different digital radiographic methods (panoramic, lateral cephalometric and periapical) with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: Precalibrated thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed at 24 locations in an anthropomorphic phantom (Alderson Rando Phantom, Alderson Research Laboratories, New York, NY, USA), representing a medium sized adult. The following devices were tested: Heliodent Plus (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany), Orthophos XG 5 (Sirona Dental Systems, Bernsheim, Germany) and i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA, USA). The equivalent doses and effective doses were calculated considering the recommendations of the International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP) issued in 1990 and 2007. Results: Although the effective dose of the radiographic set corresponded to 17.5% (ICRP 1990) and 47.2% (ICRP 2007) of the CBCT dose, the equivalent doses of skin, bone surface and muscle obtained by the radiographic set were higher when compared to CBCT. However, in some areas, the radiation produced by the orthodontic set was higher due to the complete periapical examination. Conclusion: Considering the optimization principle of radiation protection, i-CAT tomography should be used only in specific and justified circumstances. Additionally, following the ALARA principle, single periapical radiographies covering restricted areas are more suitable than the complete periapical examination. |
publisher |
Dental Press International |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512016000400066 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chinemlillianatsumisimabuguro digitalorthodonticradiographicsetversusconebeamcomputedtomographyanevaluationoftheeffectivedose AT vilellabeatrizdesouza digitalorthodonticradiographicsetversusconebeamcomputedtomographyanevaluationoftheeffectivedose AT mauricioclaudialuciadepinho digitalorthodonticradiographicsetversusconebeamcomputedtomographyanevaluationoftheeffectivedose AT canevaroluciaviviana digitalorthodonticradiographicsetversusconebeamcomputedtomographyanevaluationoftheeffectivedose AT deluizluizfernando digitalorthodonticradiographicsetversusconebeamcomputedtomographyanevaluationoftheeffectivedose AT vilellaoswaldodevasconcellos digitalorthodonticradiographicsetversusconebeamcomputedtomographyanevaluationoftheeffectivedose |
_version_ |
1756439020087279616 |