Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, in vitro, the shear bond strength presented by three brands of polycrystalline ceramic brackets and one brand of metallic bracket; verify the adhesive remnant index (ARI) after the tests, and analyze, through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) the enamel surface topography after debonding, detecting the release of mineral particles. METHODS: Sixty bovine lower incisors were used. Three ceramic brackets (Allure(r), InVu(r), and Clarity(r)) and one metallic bracket (Geneus(r)) were bonded with Transbond XT(r). Kruskal-Wallis's test (significance level set at 5%) was applied to the results of share bond and ARI. Mann Whitney's test was performed to compare the pairs of brackets in relation to their ARI. Brown-Forsythe's test (significance level set at 5%) was applied to the results of enamel chemical composition. Comparisons between groups were made with Games-Howell's and the Post-hoc tests. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed in relation to the shear bond strength loads. Clarity(r) brackets were the most affected in relation to the surface topography and to the release of mineral particles of enamel (calcium ions). CONCLUSION: With regard to the ARI, there was a prevalence of score 4 (40.4%). As for enamel surface topography, the Geneus(r) bracket was the only one which did not show superficial tissue loss. The InVu(r) and Clarity(r) ones showed cohesive fractures in 33.3% and the Allure(r) in 50%, the latter being the one that presented most fractures during removal.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rocha,José Maurício da, Gravina,Marco Abdo, Campos,Marcio José da Silva, Quintão,Cátia Cardoso Abdo, Elias,Carlos Nelson, Vitral,Robert Willer Farinazzo
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Dental Press International 2014
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000100077
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2176-94512014000100077
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2176-945120140001000772015-08-21Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic bracketsRocha,José Maurício daGravina,Marco AbdoCampos,Marcio José da SilvaQuintão,Cátia Cardoso AbdoElias,Carlos NelsonVitral,Robert Willer Farinazzo Shear bond strength Tooth enamel Orthodontic brackets Scanning electron microscopy OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, in vitro, the shear bond strength presented by three brands of polycrystalline ceramic brackets and one brand of metallic bracket; verify the adhesive remnant index (ARI) after the tests, and analyze, through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) the enamel surface topography after debonding, detecting the release of mineral particles. METHODS: Sixty bovine lower incisors were used. Three ceramic brackets (Allure(r), InVu(r), and Clarity(r)) and one metallic bracket (Geneus(r)) were bonded with Transbond XT(r). Kruskal-Wallis's test (significance level set at 5%) was applied to the results of share bond and ARI. Mann Whitney's test was performed to compare the pairs of brackets in relation to their ARI. Brown-Forsythe's test (significance level set at 5%) was applied to the results of enamel chemical composition. Comparisons between groups were made with Games-Howell's and the Post-hoc tests. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed in relation to the shear bond strength loads. Clarity(r) brackets were the most affected in relation to the surface topography and to the release of mineral particles of enamel (calcium ions). CONCLUSION: With regard to the ARI, there was a prevalence of score 4 (40.4%). As for enamel surface topography, the Geneus(r) bracket was the only one which did not show superficial tissue loss. The InVu(r) and Clarity(r) ones showed cohesive fractures in 33.3% and the Allure(r) in 50%, the latter being the one that presented most fractures during removal. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDental Press InternationalDental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.19 n.1 20142014-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000100077en10.1590/2176-9451.19.1.077-085.oar
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Rocha,José Maurício da
Gravina,Marco Abdo
Campos,Marcio José da Silva
Quintão,Cátia Cardoso Abdo
Elias,Carlos Nelson
Vitral,Robert Willer Farinazzo
spellingShingle Rocha,José Maurício da
Gravina,Marco Abdo
Campos,Marcio José da Silva
Quintão,Cátia Cardoso Abdo
Elias,Carlos Nelson
Vitral,Robert Willer Farinazzo
Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets
author_facet Rocha,José Maurício da
Gravina,Marco Abdo
Campos,Marcio José da Silva
Quintão,Cátia Cardoso Abdo
Elias,Carlos Nelson
Vitral,Robert Willer Farinazzo
author_sort Rocha,José Maurício da
title Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets
title_short Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets
title_full Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets
title_fullStr Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets
title_full_unstemmed Shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets
title_sort shear bond resistance and enamel surface comparison after the bonding and debonding of ceramic and metallic brackets
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate, in vitro, the shear bond strength presented by three brands of polycrystalline ceramic brackets and one brand of metallic bracket; verify the adhesive remnant index (ARI) after the tests, and analyze, through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) the enamel surface topography after debonding, detecting the release of mineral particles. METHODS: Sixty bovine lower incisors were used. Three ceramic brackets (Allure(r), InVu(r), and Clarity(r)) and one metallic bracket (Geneus(r)) were bonded with Transbond XT(r). Kruskal-Wallis's test (significance level set at 5%) was applied to the results of share bond and ARI. Mann Whitney's test was performed to compare the pairs of brackets in relation to their ARI. Brown-Forsythe's test (significance level set at 5%) was applied to the results of enamel chemical composition. Comparisons between groups were made with Games-Howell's and the Post-hoc tests. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed in relation to the shear bond strength loads. Clarity(r) brackets were the most affected in relation to the surface topography and to the release of mineral particles of enamel (calcium ions). CONCLUSION: With regard to the ARI, there was a prevalence of score 4 (40.4%). As for enamel surface topography, the Geneus(r) bracket was the only one which did not show superficial tissue loss. The InVu(r) and Clarity(r) ones showed cohesive fractures in 33.3% and the Allure(r) in 50%, the latter being the one that presented most fractures during removal.
publisher Dental Press International
publishDate 2014
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512014000100077
work_keys_str_mv AT rochajosemauricioda shearbondresistanceandenamelsurfacecomparisonafterthebondinganddebondingofceramicandmetallicbrackets
AT gravinamarcoabdo shearbondresistanceandenamelsurfacecomparisonafterthebondinganddebondingofceramicandmetallicbrackets
AT camposmarciojosedasilva shearbondresistanceandenamelsurfacecomparisonafterthebondinganddebondingofceramicandmetallicbrackets
AT quintaocatiacardosoabdo shearbondresistanceandenamelsurfacecomparisonafterthebondinganddebondingofceramicandmetallicbrackets
AT eliascarlosnelson shearbondresistanceandenamelsurfacecomparisonafterthebondinganddebondingofceramicandmetallicbrackets
AT vitralrobertwillerfarinazzo shearbondresistanceandenamelsurfacecomparisonafterthebondinganddebondingofceramicandmetallicbrackets
_version_ 1756438987733467136