Influence of surface treatment on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets

INTRODUCTION: The shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to micro-hybrid and micro-particulate resins under different surface treatment methods was assessed. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty test samples were divided into 28 groups (n = 10), where 140 specimens were filled with Durafill micro-particulate resin and 140 with Charisma composite. In 140 samples, a coupling agent (silane) was applied. The surface treatment methods were: Phosphoric and hydrofluoric acid etching, sodium bicarbonate and aluminum oxide blasting, stone and burs. A Universal Instron Machine was used to apply an occlusal shear force directly to the resin composite bracket surface at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. The means were compared using analysis of variance and multivariate regression to assess the interaction between composites and surface treatment methods. RESULTS: Means and standard deviations for the groups were: Sodium bicarbonate jet 11.27±2.78; burs 9.26±3.01; stone 7.95±3.67; aluminum oxide blasting 7.04±3.21; phosphoric acid 5.82±1.90; hydrofluoric acid 4.54±2.87, and without treatment 2.75±1.49. An increase of 1.94 MPa in shear bond strength was seen in Charisma groups. Silane agent application reduced the Charisma shear bond strength by 0.68 Mpa, but increased Durafill means for bicarbonate blasting (0.83), burs (0.98) and stone drilling (0.46). CONCLUSION: The sodium bicarbonate blasting, burs and stone drilling methods produced adequate shear bond strength and may be suitable for clinical use. The Charisma micro hybrid resin composite showed higher shear bond means than Durafill micro particle composite.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brunharo,Ione Helena Vieira Portella, Fernandes,Daniel Jogaib, Miranda,Mauro Sayão de, Artese,Flavia
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Dental Press International 2013
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000300010
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2176-94512013000300010
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2176-945120130003000102013-10-31Influence of surface treatment on shear bond strength of orthodontic bracketsBrunharo,Ione Helena Vieira PortellaFernandes,Daniel JogaibMiranda,Mauro Sayão deArtese,Flavia Shear bond strength Dental materials Orthodontic brackets Orthodontics INTRODUCTION: The shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to micro-hybrid and micro-particulate resins under different surface treatment methods was assessed. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty test samples were divided into 28 groups (n = 10), where 140 specimens were filled with Durafill micro-particulate resin and 140 with Charisma composite. In 140 samples, a coupling agent (silane) was applied. The surface treatment methods were: Phosphoric and hydrofluoric acid etching, sodium bicarbonate and aluminum oxide blasting, stone and burs. A Universal Instron Machine was used to apply an occlusal shear force directly to the resin composite bracket surface at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. The means were compared using analysis of variance and multivariate regression to assess the interaction between composites and surface treatment methods. RESULTS: Means and standard deviations for the groups were: Sodium bicarbonate jet 11.27±2.78; burs 9.26±3.01; stone 7.95±3.67; aluminum oxide blasting 7.04±3.21; phosphoric acid 5.82±1.90; hydrofluoric acid 4.54±2.87, and without treatment 2.75±1.49. An increase of 1.94 MPa in shear bond strength was seen in Charisma groups. Silane agent application reduced the Charisma shear bond strength by 0.68 Mpa, but increased Durafill means for bicarbonate blasting (0.83), burs (0.98) and stone drilling (0.46). CONCLUSION: The sodium bicarbonate blasting, burs and stone drilling methods produced adequate shear bond strength and may be suitable for clinical use. The Charisma micro hybrid resin composite showed higher shear bond means than Durafill micro particle composite.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDental Press InternationalDental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.18 n.3 20132013-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000300010en10.1590/S2176-94512013000300010
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Brunharo,Ione Helena Vieira Portella
Fernandes,Daniel Jogaib
Miranda,Mauro Sayão de
Artese,Flavia
spellingShingle Brunharo,Ione Helena Vieira Portella
Fernandes,Daniel Jogaib
Miranda,Mauro Sayão de
Artese,Flavia
Influence of surface treatment on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets
author_facet Brunharo,Ione Helena Vieira Portella
Fernandes,Daniel Jogaib
Miranda,Mauro Sayão de
Artese,Flavia
author_sort Brunharo,Ione Helena Vieira Portella
title Influence of surface treatment on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets
title_short Influence of surface treatment on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets
title_full Influence of surface treatment on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets
title_fullStr Influence of surface treatment on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets
title_full_unstemmed Influence of surface treatment on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets
title_sort influence of surface treatment on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets
description INTRODUCTION: The shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to micro-hybrid and micro-particulate resins under different surface treatment methods was assessed. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty test samples were divided into 28 groups (n = 10), where 140 specimens were filled with Durafill micro-particulate resin and 140 with Charisma composite. In 140 samples, a coupling agent (silane) was applied. The surface treatment methods were: Phosphoric and hydrofluoric acid etching, sodium bicarbonate and aluminum oxide blasting, stone and burs. A Universal Instron Machine was used to apply an occlusal shear force directly to the resin composite bracket surface at a speed of 0.5 mm/min. The means were compared using analysis of variance and multivariate regression to assess the interaction between composites and surface treatment methods. RESULTS: Means and standard deviations for the groups were: Sodium bicarbonate jet 11.27±2.78; burs 9.26±3.01; stone 7.95±3.67; aluminum oxide blasting 7.04±3.21; phosphoric acid 5.82±1.90; hydrofluoric acid 4.54±2.87, and without treatment 2.75±1.49. An increase of 1.94 MPa in shear bond strength was seen in Charisma groups. Silane agent application reduced the Charisma shear bond strength by 0.68 Mpa, but increased Durafill means for bicarbonate blasting (0.83), burs (0.98) and stone drilling (0.46). CONCLUSION: The sodium bicarbonate blasting, burs and stone drilling methods produced adequate shear bond strength and may be suitable for clinical use. The Charisma micro hybrid resin composite showed higher shear bond means than Durafill micro particle composite.
publisher Dental Press International
publishDate 2013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000300010
work_keys_str_mv AT brunharoionehelenavieiraportella influenceofsurfacetreatmentonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT fernandesdanieljogaib influenceofsurfacetreatmentonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT mirandamaurosayaode influenceofsurfacetreatmentonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT arteseflavia influenceofsurfacetreatmentonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
_version_ 1756438975891898368