Class II malocclusion treatment using high-pull headgear with a splint: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the scientific evidence pertaining to the effectiveness of high-pull headgear in growing Class II subjects. METHODS: A literature survey was performed by electronic database search. The survey covered the period from January 1966 to December 2008 and used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Articles were initially selected based on their titles and abstracts; the full articles were then retrieved. The inclusion criteria included growing subjects between 8 to 15 years of age, Class II malocclusion treatment with high-pull headgear, and a control group with Class II malocclusion. References from selected articles were hand-searched for additional publications. Selected studies were evaluated methodologically. RESULTS: Four articles were selected; none were randomized controlled trials. All of the articles clearly formulated their objectives and used appropriate measures. The studies showed that high-pull headgear treatment improves skeletal and dental relationship, distal displacement of the maxilla, vertical eruption control and upper molars distalization. One of the studies showed a slight clockwise rotation of the palatal plane; the others showed no significant treatment effect. The mandible was not affected by the treatment. CONCLUSION: While there is still a lack of strong evidence demonstrating the effects of high-pull headgear with a splint, other studies indicate that the AP relations improve due to distalization of the maxilla and upper molars, with little or no treatment effects in the mandible. Greater attention to the design should be given to improve the quality of such trials.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jacob,Helder B., Buschang,Peter H., Santos-Pinto,Ary dos
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Dental Press International 2013
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000200009
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2176-94512013000200009
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2176-945120130002000092013-08-16Class II malocclusion treatment using high-pull headgear with a splint: a systematic reviewJacob,Helder B.Buschang,Peter H.Santos-Pinto,Ary dos Orthodontics Angle Class II malocclusion Treatment results OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the scientific evidence pertaining to the effectiveness of high-pull headgear in growing Class II subjects. METHODS: A literature survey was performed by electronic database search. The survey covered the period from January 1966 to December 2008 and used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Articles were initially selected based on their titles and abstracts; the full articles were then retrieved. The inclusion criteria included growing subjects between 8 to 15 years of age, Class II malocclusion treatment with high-pull headgear, and a control group with Class II malocclusion. References from selected articles were hand-searched for additional publications. Selected studies were evaluated methodologically. RESULTS: Four articles were selected; none were randomized controlled trials. All of the articles clearly formulated their objectives and used appropriate measures. The studies showed that high-pull headgear treatment improves skeletal and dental relationship, distal displacement of the maxilla, vertical eruption control and upper molars distalization. One of the studies showed a slight clockwise rotation of the palatal plane; the others showed no significant treatment effect. The mandible was not affected by the treatment. CONCLUSION: While there is still a lack of strong evidence demonstrating the effects of high-pull headgear with a splint, other studies indicate that the AP relations improve due to distalization of the maxilla and upper molars, with little or no treatment effects in the mandible. Greater attention to the design should be given to improve the quality of such trials.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDental Press InternationalDental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.18 n.2 20132013-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000200009en10.1590/S2176-94512013000200009
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Jacob,Helder B.
Buschang,Peter H.
Santos-Pinto,Ary dos
spellingShingle Jacob,Helder B.
Buschang,Peter H.
Santos-Pinto,Ary dos
Class II malocclusion treatment using high-pull headgear with a splint: a systematic review
author_facet Jacob,Helder B.
Buschang,Peter H.
Santos-Pinto,Ary dos
author_sort Jacob,Helder B.
title Class II malocclusion treatment using high-pull headgear with a splint: a systematic review
title_short Class II malocclusion treatment using high-pull headgear with a splint: a systematic review
title_full Class II malocclusion treatment using high-pull headgear with a splint: a systematic review
title_fullStr Class II malocclusion treatment using high-pull headgear with a splint: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Class II malocclusion treatment using high-pull headgear with a splint: a systematic review
title_sort class ii malocclusion treatment using high-pull headgear with a splint: a systematic review
description OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the scientific evidence pertaining to the effectiveness of high-pull headgear in growing Class II subjects. METHODS: A literature survey was performed by electronic database search. The survey covered the period from January 1966 to December 2008 and used Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). Articles were initially selected based on their titles and abstracts; the full articles were then retrieved. The inclusion criteria included growing subjects between 8 to 15 years of age, Class II malocclusion treatment with high-pull headgear, and a control group with Class II malocclusion. References from selected articles were hand-searched for additional publications. Selected studies were evaluated methodologically. RESULTS: Four articles were selected; none were randomized controlled trials. All of the articles clearly formulated their objectives and used appropriate measures. The studies showed that high-pull headgear treatment improves skeletal and dental relationship, distal displacement of the maxilla, vertical eruption control and upper molars distalization. One of the studies showed a slight clockwise rotation of the palatal plane; the others showed no significant treatment effect. The mandible was not affected by the treatment. CONCLUSION: While there is still a lack of strong evidence demonstrating the effects of high-pull headgear with a splint, other studies indicate that the AP relations improve due to distalization of the maxilla and upper molars, with little or no treatment effects in the mandible. Greater attention to the design should be given to improve the quality of such trials.
publisher Dental Press International
publishDate 2013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000200009
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobhelderb classiimalocclusiontreatmentusinghighpullheadgearwithasplintasystematicreview
AT buschangpeterh classiimalocclusiontreatmentusinghighpullheadgearwithasplintasystematicreview
AT santospintoarydos classiimalocclusiontreatmentusinghighpullheadgearwithasplintasystematicreview
_version_ 1756438972162113536