Influence of Ortho Primer Morelli adhesion booster on orthodontic brackets shear bond strength

OBJECTIVE: This work aimed at assessing the bond strength (AS), the site of the flaw and the relation between them and Ortho Primer Morelli® (OPM) adhesion optimizer. METHODS: Sixty test specimens, made out of bovine permanent lower incisors, were divided into three groups: TXT Primer (control), in which a conventional adhesive system was applied (primer and paste); OPM, in which TXT primer was replaced by OPM; and TXT without Primer, in which only TXT paste was used. A shear force was applied at a speed of 0,5 mm/min. Failure site was assessed by the Remaining Adhesion Index (RAI). RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis demonstrated that OPM (8.54 ± 1.86 MPa) presented a statistically higher AS (p < 0.05) IF compared to TXT Primer (6.83 ± 2.05 MPa). There was no statistically significant difference (p &gt; 0.05) between TXT with or without Primer (6.42 ± 2.12 MPa). Regarding the RAI, the K test demonstrated that TXT Primer and OPM (prevailing scores 2 and 3) showed higher values (p < 0.05) IF compared to TXT without Primer (prevailing scores 0 and 1). Spearman demonstrated that there was no correlation between AS and RAI (p &gt; 0.05). CONCLUSION: OPM increases AS and presents the same bond failure location if compared to a conventional adhesive system; the use of the TXT adhesive system paste only was shown to have the same AS if compared to conventional systems, except it does not allow to predict the adhesive failure site; there is no correlation between AS and bond failure location, regardless of the use of any adhesion optimizer.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Invernici,Sabrina de Mendonça, Maruo,Ivan Toshio, Camargo,Elisa Souza, Hirata,Thais Miyuki, Maruo,Hiroshi, Guariza Filho,Odilon, Tanaka,Orlando
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Dental Press International 2012
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000300011
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S2176-94512012000300011
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S2176-945120120003000112012-08-16Influence of Ortho Primer Morelli adhesion booster on orthodontic brackets shear bond strengthInvernici,Sabrina de MendonçaMaruo,Ivan ToshioCamargo,Elisa SouzaHirata,Thais MiyukiMaruo,HiroshiGuariza Filho,OdilonTanaka,Orlando Primer Adhesion Shear adhesive strength OBJECTIVE: This work aimed at assessing the bond strength (AS), the site of the flaw and the relation between them and Ortho Primer Morelli® (OPM) adhesion optimizer. METHODS: Sixty test specimens, made out of bovine permanent lower incisors, were divided into three groups: TXT Primer (control), in which a conventional adhesive system was applied (primer and paste); OPM, in which TXT primer was replaced by OPM; and TXT without Primer, in which only TXT paste was used. A shear force was applied at a speed of 0,5 mm/min. Failure site was assessed by the Remaining Adhesion Index (RAI). RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis demonstrated that OPM (8.54 ± 1.86 MPa) presented a statistically higher AS (p < 0.05) IF compared to TXT Primer (6.83 ± 2.05 MPa). There was no statistically significant difference (p &gt; 0.05) between TXT with or without Primer (6.42 ± 2.12 MPa). Regarding the RAI, the K test demonstrated that TXT Primer and OPM (prevailing scores 2 and 3) showed higher values (p < 0.05) IF compared to TXT without Primer (prevailing scores 0 and 1). Spearman demonstrated that there was no correlation between AS and RAI (p &gt; 0.05). CONCLUSION: OPM increases AS and presents the same bond failure location if compared to a conventional adhesive system; the use of the TXT adhesive system paste only was shown to have the same AS if compared to conventional systems, except it does not allow to predict the adhesive failure site; there is no correlation between AS and bond failure location, regardless of the use of any adhesion optimizer.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDental Press InternationalDental Press Journal of Orthodontics v.17 n.3 20122012-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000300011en10.1590/S2176-94512012000300011
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Invernici,Sabrina de Mendonça
Maruo,Ivan Toshio
Camargo,Elisa Souza
Hirata,Thais Miyuki
Maruo,Hiroshi
Guariza Filho,Odilon
Tanaka,Orlando
spellingShingle Invernici,Sabrina de Mendonça
Maruo,Ivan Toshio
Camargo,Elisa Souza
Hirata,Thais Miyuki
Maruo,Hiroshi
Guariza Filho,Odilon
Tanaka,Orlando
Influence of Ortho Primer Morelli adhesion booster on orthodontic brackets shear bond strength
author_facet Invernici,Sabrina de Mendonça
Maruo,Ivan Toshio
Camargo,Elisa Souza
Hirata,Thais Miyuki
Maruo,Hiroshi
Guariza Filho,Odilon
Tanaka,Orlando
author_sort Invernici,Sabrina de Mendonça
title Influence of Ortho Primer Morelli adhesion booster on orthodontic brackets shear bond strength
title_short Influence of Ortho Primer Morelli adhesion booster on orthodontic brackets shear bond strength
title_full Influence of Ortho Primer Morelli adhesion booster on orthodontic brackets shear bond strength
title_fullStr Influence of Ortho Primer Morelli adhesion booster on orthodontic brackets shear bond strength
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Ortho Primer Morelli adhesion booster on orthodontic brackets shear bond strength
title_sort influence of ortho primer morelli adhesion booster on orthodontic brackets shear bond strength
description OBJECTIVE: This work aimed at assessing the bond strength (AS), the site of the flaw and the relation between them and Ortho Primer Morelli® (OPM) adhesion optimizer. METHODS: Sixty test specimens, made out of bovine permanent lower incisors, were divided into three groups: TXT Primer (control), in which a conventional adhesive system was applied (primer and paste); OPM, in which TXT primer was replaced by OPM; and TXT without Primer, in which only TXT paste was used. A shear force was applied at a speed of 0,5 mm/min. Failure site was assessed by the Remaining Adhesion Index (RAI). RESULTS: Kruskal-Wallis demonstrated that OPM (8.54 ± 1.86 MPa) presented a statistically higher AS (p < 0.05) IF compared to TXT Primer (6.83 ± 2.05 MPa). There was no statistically significant difference (p &gt; 0.05) between TXT with or without Primer (6.42 ± 2.12 MPa). Regarding the RAI, the K test demonstrated that TXT Primer and OPM (prevailing scores 2 and 3) showed higher values (p < 0.05) IF compared to TXT without Primer (prevailing scores 0 and 1). Spearman demonstrated that there was no correlation between AS and RAI (p &gt; 0.05). CONCLUSION: OPM increases AS and presents the same bond failure location if compared to a conventional adhesive system; the use of the TXT adhesive system paste only was shown to have the same AS if compared to conventional systems, except it does not allow to predict the adhesive failure site; there is no correlation between AS and bond failure location, regardless of the use of any adhesion optimizer.
publisher Dental Press International
publishDate 2012
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512012000300011
work_keys_str_mv AT invernicisabrinademendonca influenceoforthoprimermorelliadhesionboosteronorthodonticbracketsshearbondstrength
AT maruoivantoshio influenceoforthoprimermorelliadhesionboosteronorthodonticbracketsshearbondstrength
AT camargoelisasouza influenceoforthoprimermorelliadhesionboosteronorthodonticbracketsshearbondstrength
AT hiratathaismiyuki influenceoforthoprimermorelliadhesionboosteronorthodonticbracketsshearbondstrength
AT maruohiroshi influenceoforthoprimermorelliadhesionboosteronorthodonticbracketsshearbondstrength
AT guarizafilhoodilon influenceoforthoprimermorelliadhesionboosteronorthodonticbracketsshearbondstrength
AT tanakaorlando influenceoforthoprimermorelliadhesionboosteronorthodonticbracketsshearbondstrength
_version_ 1756438953893822464