Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries Arrest

ABSTRACT Objective To compare the capacity of silver diamine fluoride (30%) and the bioactive giomer light-curing varnish for arresting ICDAS score 5 non-retentive caries lesions. Material and Methods An in vitro analytical study was conducted using 36 healthy primary teeth, in which a cavity was created, divided into 3 groups: control (distilled and deionized water), giomer-based light-curing varnish – Barrier Coat, and Silver Diamine Fluoride 30% – Cariestop (SDF). The samples were analyzed for mineral loss as measured by surface microhardness (SMH).The Knoop microhardness test was performed using the HVS-1000 microhardness tester. The data were compared by two-way analysis of variance – treatment and time (before and after treatment) followed by Tukey’s post-test. The significance level adopted in all analyzes was 5%. Results The specimens treated with giomer showed higher SMH compared to the untreated group but were similar to those of the SDF group. The SDF group, on the other hand, showed no statistically significant difference from the control group (p=0.010). Conclusion The giomer varnish had a remineralizing effect on artificial dentinal caries.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reis,Maressa Borges dos, D’Alessandro,Monique Gonçalves, Freitas Moraes,Kenia Aparecida, Medeiros Urquiza,Suéllen Peixoto de, Pereira Moro,Bruna Lorena, Kerber Tedesco,Tamara, Pettorossi Imparato,José Carlos
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação de Apoio à Pesquisa em Saúde Bucal 2021
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-46322021000100436
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1983-46322021000100436
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1983-463220210001004362021-12-02Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries ArrestReis,Maressa Borges dosD’Alessandro,Monique GonçalvesFreitas Moraes,Kenia AparecidaMedeiros Urquiza,Suéllen Peixoto dePereira Moro,Bruna LorenaKerber Tedesco,TamaraPettorossi Imparato,José Carlos Dental Caries Fluorides Mechanical Tests Hardness Tests Dentin ABSTRACT Objective To compare the capacity of silver diamine fluoride (30%) and the bioactive giomer light-curing varnish for arresting ICDAS score 5 non-retentive caries lesions. Material and Methods An in vitro analytical study was conducted using 36 healthy primary teeth, in which a cavity was created, divided into 3 groups: control (distilled and deionized water), giomer-based light-curing varnish – Barrier Coat, and Silver Diamine Fluoride 30% – Cariestop (SDF). The samples were analyzed for mineral loss as measured by surface microhardness (SMH).The Knoop microhardness test was performed using the HVS-1000 microhardness tester. The data were compared by two-way analysis of variance – treatment and time (before and after treatment) followed by Tukey’s post-test. The significance level adopted in all analyzes was 5%. Results The specimens treated with giomer showed higher SMH compared to the untreated group but were similar to those of the SDF group. The SDF group, on the other hand, showed no statistically significant difference from the control group (p=0.010). Conclusion The giomer varnish had a remineralizing effect on artificial dentinal caries.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação de Apoio à Pesquisa em Saúde BucalPesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada v.21 20212021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-46322021000100436en10.1590/pboci.2021.158
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Reis,Maressa Borges dos
D’Alessandro,Monique Gonçalves
Freitas Moraes,Kenia Aparecida
Medeiros Urquiza,Suéllen Peixoto de
Pereira Moro,Bruna Lorena
Kerber Tedesco,Tamara
Pettorossi Imparato,José Carlos
spellingShingle Reis,Maressa Borges dos
D’Alessandro,Monique Gonçalves
Freitas Moraes,Kenia Aparecida
Medeiros Urquiza,Suéllen Peixoto de
Pereira Moro,Bruna Lorena
Kerber Tedesco,Tamara
Pettorossi Imparato,José Carlos
Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries Arrest
author_facet Reis,Maressa Borges dos
D’Alessandro,Monique Gonçalves
Freitas Moraes,Kenia Aparecida
Medeiros Urquiza,Suéllen Peixoto de
Pereira Moro,Bruna Lorena
Kerber Tedesco,Tamara
Pettorossi Imparato,José Carlos
author_sort Reis,Maressa Borges dos
title Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries Arrest
title_short Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries Arrest
title_full Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries Arrest
title_fullStr Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries Arrest
title_full_unstemmed Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries Arrest
title_sort silver diamine fluoride versus bioactive giomer light-curing varnish: an in vitro study on caries arrest
description ABSTRACT Objective To compare the capacity of silver diamine fluoride (30%) and the bioactive giomer light-curing varnish for arresting ICDAS score 5 non-retentive caries lesions. Material and Methods An in vitro analytical study was conducted using 36 healthy primary teeth, in which a cavity was created, divided into 3 groups: control (distilled and deionized water), giomer-based light-curing varnish – Barrier Coat, and Silver Diamine Fluoride 30% – Cariestop (SDF). The samples were analyzed for mineral loss as measured by surface microhardness (SMH).The Knoop microhardness test was performed using the HVS-1000 microhardness tester. The data were compared by two-way analysis of variance – treatment and time (before and after treatment) followed by Tukey’s post-test. The significance level adopted in all analyzes was 5%. Results The specimens treated with giomer showed higher SMH compared to the untreated group but were similar to those of the SDF group. The SDF group, on the other hand, showed no statistically significant difference from the control group (p=0.010). Conclusion The giomer varnish had a remineralizing effect on artificial dentinal caries.
publisher Associação de Apoio à Pesquisa em Saúde Bucal
publishDate 2021
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-46322021000100436
work_keys_str_mv AT reismaressaborgesdos silverdiaminefluorideversusbioactivegiomerlightcuringvarnishaninvitrostudyoncariesarrest
AT dalessandromoniquegoncalves silverdiaminefluorideversusbioactivegiomerlightcuringvarnishaninvitrostudyoncariesarrest
AT freitasmoraeskeniaaparecida silverdiaminefluorideversusbioactivegiomerlightcuringvarnishaninvitrostudyoncariesarrest
AT medeirosurquizasuellenpeixotode silverdiaminefluorideversusbioactivegiomerlightcuringvarnishaninvitrostudyoncariesarrest
AT pereiramorobrunalorena silverdiaminefluorideversusbioactivegiomerlightcuringvarnishaninvitrostudyoncariesarrest
AT kerbertedescotamara silverdiaminefluorideversusbioactivegiomerlightcuringvarnishaninvitrostudyoncariesarrest
AT pettorossiimparatojosecarlos silverdiaminefluorideversusbioactivegiomerlightcuringvarnishaninvitrostudyoncariesarrest
_version_ 1756436600693194752