Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries Arrest
ABSTRACT Objective To compare the capacity of silver diamine fluoride (30%) and the bioactive giomer light-curing varnish for arresting ICDAS score 5 non-retentive caries lesions. Material and Methods An in vitro analytical study was conducted using 36 healthy primary teeth, in which a cavity was created, divided into 3 groups: control (distilled and deionized water), giomer-based light-curing varnish – Barrier Coat, and Silver Diamine Fluoride 30% – Cariestop (SDF). The samples were analyzed for mineral loss as measured by surface microhardness (SMH).The Knoop microhardness test was performed using the HVS-1000 microhardness tester. The data were compared by two-way analysis of variance – treatment and time (before and after treatment) followed by Tukey’s post-test. The significance level adopted in all analyzes was 5%. Results The specimens treated with giomer showed higher SMH compared to the untreated group but were similar to those of the SDF group. The SDF group, on the other hand, showed no statistically significant difference from the control group (p=0.010). Conclusion The giomer varnish had a remineralizing effect on artificial dentinal caries.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Associação de Apoio à Pesquisa em Saúde Bucal
2021
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-46322021000100436 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S1983-46322021000100436 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S1983-463220210001004362021-12-02Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries ArrestReis,Maressa Borges dosD’Alessandro,Monique GonçalvesFreitas Moraes,Kenia AparecidaMedeiros Urquiza,Suéllen Peixoto dePereira Moro,Bruna LorenaKerber Tedesco,TamaraPettorossi Imparato,José Carlos Dental Caries Fluorides Mechanical Tests Hardness Tests Dentin ABSTRACT Objective To compare the capacity of silver diamine fluoride (30%) and the bioactive giomer light-curing varnish for arresting ICDAS score 5 non-retentive caries lesions. Material and Methods An in vitro analytical study was conducted using 36 healthy primary teeth, in which a cavity was created, divided into 3 groups: control (distilled and deionized water), giomer-based light-curing varnish – Barrier Coat, and Silver Diamine Fluoride 30% – Cariestop (SDF). The samples were analyzed for mineral loss as measured by surface microhardness (SMH).The Knoop microhardness test was performed using the HVS-1000 microhardness tester. The data were compared by two-way analysis of variance – treatment and time (before and after treatment) followed by Tukey’s post-test. The significance level adopted in all analyzes was 5%. Results The specimens treated with giomer showed higher SMH compared to the untreated group but were similar to those of the SDF group. The SDF group, on the other hand, showed no statistically significant difference from the control group (p=0.010). Conclusion The giomer varnish had a remineralizing effect on artificial dentinal caries.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação de Apoio à Pesquisa em Saúde BucalPesquisa Brasileira em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada v.21 20212021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-46322021000100436en10.1590/pboci.2021.158 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Reis,Maressa Borges dos D’Alessandro,Monique Gonçalves Freitas Moraes,Kenia Aparecida Medeiros Urquiza,Suéllen Peixoto de Pereira Moro,Bruna Lorena Kerber Tedesco,Tamara Pettorossi Imparato,José Carlos |
spellingShingle |
Reis,Maressa Borges dos D’Alessandro,Monique Gonçalves Freitas Moraes,Kenia Aparecida Medeiros Urquiza,Suéllen Peixoto de Pereira Moro,Bruna Lorena Kerber Tedesco,Tamara Pettorossi Imparato,José Carlos Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries Arrest |
author_facet |
Reis,Maressa Borges dos D’Alessandro,Monique Gonçalves Freitas Moraes,Kenia Aparecida Medeiros Urquiza,Suéllen Peixoto de Pereira Moro,Bruna Lorena Kerber Tedesco,Tamara Pettorossi Imparato,José Carlos |
author_sort |
Reis,Maressa Borges dos |
title |
Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries Arrest |
title_short |
Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries Arrest |
title_full |
Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries Arrest |
title_fullStr |
Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries Arrest |
title_full_unstemmed |
Silver Diamine Fluoride versus Bioactive Giomer Light-Curing Varnish: An In Vitro Study on Caries Arrest |
title_sort |
silver diamine fluoride versus bioactive giomer light-curing varnish: an in vitro study on caries arrest |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective To compare the capacity of silver diamine fluoride (30%) and the bioactive giomer light-curing varnish for arresting ICDAS score 5 non-retentive caries lesions. Material and Methods An in vitro analytical study was conducted using 36 healthy primary teeth, in which a cavity was created, divided into 3 groups: control (distilled and deionized water), giomer-based light-curing varnish – Barrier Coat, and Silver Diamine Fluoride 30% – Cariestop (SDF). The samples were analyzed for mineral loss as measured by surface microhardness (SMH).The Knoop microhardness test was performed using the HVS-1000 microhardness tester. The data were compared by two-way analysis of variance – treatment and time (before and after treatment) followed by Tukey’s post-test. The significance level adopted in all analyzes was 5%. Results The specimens treated with giomer showed higher SMH compared to the untreated group but were similar to those of the SDF group. The SDF group, on the other hand, showed no statistically significant difference from the control group (p=0.010). Conclusion The giomer varnish had a remineralizing effect on artificial dentinal caries. |
publisher |
Associação de Apoio à Pesquisa em Saúde Bucal |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-46322021000100436 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT reismaressaborgesdos silverdiaminefluorideversusbioactivegiomerlightcuringvarnishaninvitrostudyoncariesarrest AT dalessandromoniquegoncalves silverdiaminefluorideversusbioactivegiomerlightcuringvarnishaninvitrostudyoncariesarrest AT freitasmoraeskeniaaparecida silverdiaminefluorideversusbioactivegiomerlightcuringvarnishaninvitrostudyoncariesarrest AT medeirosurquizasuellenpeixotode silverdiaminefluorideversusbioactivegiomerlightcuringvarnishaninvitrostudyoncariesarrest AT pereiramorobrunalorena silverdiaminefluorideversusbioactivegiomerlightcuringvarnishaninvitrostudyoncariesarrest AT kerbertedescotamara silverdiaminefluorideversusbioactivegiomerlightcuringvarnishaninvitrostudyoncariesarrest AT pettorossiimparatojosecarlos silverdiaminefluorideversusbioactivegiomerlightcuringvarnishaninvitrostudyoncariesarrest |
_version_ |
1756436600693194752 |