Exploring the effects of deep-defending vs high-press on footballers’ tactical behaviour, physical and physiological performance: A pilot study

Abstract AIMS The aim of this study was to explore the effects of a deep-defending vs high-press defending strategy on footballers’ tactical behaviour, physical and physiological responses, when in numerical difference. METHODS Nineteen elite professional footballers (outfield players) participated in this study, playing an 11vs10 match (simulating an early dismissal) for two halves of 10 minutes on a full-sized regulation pitch. The 11-men team was instructed by the head coach to defend closer to goal in the first half (deep-defending) and then defend higher up the pitch in the second half (high-press). Players’ positional data were used to calculate the distance between team centroids, players’ distance to own and to opponent centroid, teams’ effective playing space (EPS), teams’ length per width ratio, distance covered and player velocity. Heart rate was measured via short-range radio telemetry. RESULTS Relative-phase analysis of teams’ EPS showed 61.6% of anti-phase synchronisation pattern (i.e. the values change in opposite directions) in the deep-defending game. In the high-press game, teams’ centroid distances were closer (% difference in means; ±90% CL, -21.0%; ±9.5%), while players’ distances to own and opponent centroids were 20% more regular. Distance covered (-19.8%; ±2.5%), player velocity (-20.0%; ±2.5%) and heart rates also decreased in the high-press game. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that, adopting a high-press defending strategy can elicit closer centroid distances, more regular movement patterns, decreased synchronisation patterns of EPS, lower distance covered, lower player velocity, and lower heart rates. Coaches may also consider adopting a high-press strategy, when in numerical superiority, to decrease players’ physical and physiological demands.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Low,Benedict, Boas,Gabriel Vilas, Meyer,Lars, Lizaso,Eneritz, Hoitz,Fabian, Leite,Nuno, Gonçalves,Bruno
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual Paulista 2018
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65742018000200309
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1980-65742018000200309
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1980-657420180002003092018-05-25Exploring the effects of deep-defending vs high-press on footballers’ tactical behaviour, physical and physiological performance: A pilot studyLow,BenedictBoas,Gabriel VilasMeyer,LarsLizaso,EneritzHoitz,FabianLeite,NunoGonçalves,Bruno football soccer behavioural dynamics player positioning collective movement interpersonal dynamics self-organization processes Abstract AIMS The aim of this study was to explore the effects of a deep-defending vs high-press defending strategy on footballers’ tactical behaviour, physical and physiological responses, when in numerical difference. METHODS Nineteen elite professional footballers (outfield players) participated in this study, playing an 11vs10 match (simulating an early dismissal) for two halves of 10 minutes on a full-sized regulation pitch. The 11-men team was instructed by the head coach to defend closer to goal in the first half (deep-defending) and then defend higher up the pitch in the second half (high-press). Players’ positional data were used to calculate the distance between team centroids, players’ distance to own and to opponent centroid, teams’ effective playing space (EPS), teams’ length per width ratio, distance covered and player velocity. Heart rate was measured via short-range radio telemetry. RESULTS Relative-phase analysis of teams’ EPS showed 61.6% of anti-phase synchronisation pattern (i.e. the values change in opposite directions) in the deep-defending game. In the high-press game, teams’ centroid distances were closer (% difference in means; ±90% CL, -21.0%; ±9.5%), while players’ distances to own and opponent centroids were 20% more regular. Distance covered (-19.8%; ±2.5%), player velocity (-20.0%; ±2.5%) and heart rates also decreased in the high-press game. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that, adopting a high-press defending strategy can elicit closer centroid distances, more regular movement patterns, decreased synchronisation patterns of EPS, lower distance covered, lower player velocity, and lower heart rates. Coaches may also consider adopting a high-press strategy, when in numerical superiority, to decrease players’ physical and physiological demands.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidade Estadual PaulistaMotriz: Revista de Educação Física v.24 n.2 20182018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65742018000200309en10.1590/s1980-6574201800020009
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Low,Benedict
Boas,Gabriel Vilas
Meyer,Lars
Lizaso,Eneritz
Hoitz,Fabian
Leite,Nuno
Gonçalves,Bruno
spellingShingle Low,Benedict
Boas,Gabriel Vilas
Meyer,Lars
Lizaso,Eneritz
Hoitz,Fabian
Leite,Nuno
Gonçalves,Bruno
Exploring the effects of deep-defending vs high-press on footballers’ tactical behaviour, physical and physiological performance: A pilot study
author_facet Low,Benedict
Boas,Gabriel Vilas
Meyer,Lars
Lizaso,Eneritz
Hoitz,Fabian
Leite,Nuno
Gonçalves,Bruno
author_sort Low,Benedict
title Exploring the effects of deep-defending vs high-press on footballers’ tactical behaviour, physical and physiological performance: A pilot study
title_short Exploring the effects of deep-defending vs high-press on footballers’ tactical behaviour, physical and physiological performance: A pilot study
title_full Exploring the effects of deep-defending vs high-press on footballers’ tactical behaviour, physical and physiological performance: A pilot study
title_fullStr Exploring the effects of deep-defending vs high-press on footballers’ tactical behaviour, physical and physiological performance: A pilot study
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the effects of deep-defending vs high-press on footballers’ tactical behaviour, physical and physiological performance: A pilot study
title_sort exploring the effects of deep-defending vs high-press on footballers’ tactical behaviour, physical and physiological performance: a pilot study
description Abstract AIMS The aim of this study was to explore the effects of a deep-defending vs high-press defending strategy on footballers’ tactical behaviour, physical and physiological responses, when in numerical difference. METHODS Nineteen elite professional footballers (outfield players) participated in this study, playing an 11vs10 match (simulating an early dismissal) for two halves of 10 minutes on a full-sized regulation pitch. The 11-men team was instructed by the head coach to defend closer to goal in the first half (deep-defending) and then defend higher up the pitch in the second half (high-press). Players’ positional data were used to calculate the distance between team centroids, players’ distance to own and to opponent centroid, teams’ effective playing space (EPS), teams’ length per width ratio, distance covered and player velocity. Heart rate was measured via short-range radio telemetry. RESULTS Relative-phase analysis of teams’ EPS showed 61.6% of anti-phase synchronisation pattern (i.e. the values change in opposite directions) in the deep-defending game. In the high-press game, teams’ centroid distances were closer (% difference in means; ±90% CL, -21.0%; ±9.5%), while players’ distances to own and opponent centroids were 20% more regular. Distance covered (-19.8%; ±2.5%), player velocity (-20.0%; ±2.5%) and heart rates also decreased in the high-press game. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that, adopting a high-press defending strategy can elicit closer centroid distances, more regular movement patterns, decreased synchronisation patterns of EPS, lower distance covered, lower player velocity, and lower heart rates. Coaches may also consider adopting a high-press strategy, when in numerical superiority, to decrease players’ physical and physiological demands.
publisher Universidade Estadual Paulista
publishDate 2018
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65742018000200309
work_keys_str_mv AT lowbenedict exploringtheeffectsofdeepdefendingvshighpressonfootballerstacticalbehaviourphysicalandphysiologicalperformanceapilotstudy
AT boasgabrielvilas exploringtheeffectsofdeepdefendingvshighpressonfootballerstacticalbehaviourphysicalandphysiologicalperformanceapilotstudy
AT meyerlars exploringtheeffectsofdeepdefendingvshighpressonfootballerstacticalbehaviourphysicalandphysiologicalperformanceapilotstudy
AT lizasoeneritz exploringtheeffectsofdeepdefendingvshighpressonfootballerstacticalbehaviourphysicalandphysiologicalperformanceapilotstudy
AT hoitzfabian exploringtheeffectsofdeepdefendingvshighpressonfootballerstacticalbehaviourphysicalandphysiologicalperformanceapilotstudy
AT leitenuno exploringtheeffectsofdeepdefendingvshighpressonfootballerstacticalbehaviourphysicalandphysiologicalperformanceapilotstudy
AT goncalvesbruno exploringtheeffectsofdeepdefendingvshighpressonfootballerstacticalbehaviourphysicalandphysiologicalperformanceapilotstudy
_version_ 1756434660514070528