Validity analysis of one-repetition maximum strength test for determining the hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio

Abstract One of the approaches to evaluate injury prediction is the hamstrings-to-quadriceps peak torque conventional ratio (H:Q ratio). The gold standard for assessment of muscle strength in vivo is by isokinetic dynamometry; however, the one-repetition maximum strength test (1-RM) presents high correlation with isokinetic data. This study aimed to compare measures of H:Q ratio in young adults obtained by dynamometry and 1-RM testing. No significant differences were observed in the H:Q ratio when comparing 1-RM and dynamometry testing. However, there was a significant and strong correlation between the measurements obtained in the two tests. Despite this correlation, data from both tests are not equal as the H:Q ratio obtained from 1-RM test presents a systematic error. Nonetheless, the results can enhance the applicability of 1-RM test in clinical settings.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sabino,George Schayer, Felício,Diogo Carvalho, Guimarães,Cristiano Queiroz, Abreu,Bento João da Graça Azevedo, Vieira,Wouber Hérickson de Brito
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual Paulista 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65742016000300133
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1980-65742016000300133
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1980-657420160003001332016-08-01Validity analysis of one-repetition maximum strength test for determining the hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratioSabino,George SchayerFelício,Diogo CarvalhoGuimarães,Cristiano QueirozAbreu,Bento João da Graça AzevedoVieira,Wouber Hérickson de Brito muscle strength H:Q isokinetic injury prevention muscle imbalance Abstract One of the approaches to evaluate injury prediction is the hamstrings-to-quadriceps peak torque conventional ratio (H:Q ratio). The gold standard for assessment of muscle strength in vivo is by isokinetic dynamometry; however, the one-repetition maximum strength test (1-RM) presents high correlation with isokinetic data. This study aimed to compare measures of H:Q ratio in young adults obtained by dynamometry and 1-RM testing. No significant differences were observed in the H:Q ratio when comparing 1-RM and dynamometry testing. However, there was a significant and strong correlation between the measurements obtained in the two tests. Despite this correlation, data from both tests are not equal as the H:Q ratio obtained from 1-RM test presents a systematic error. Nonetheless, the results can enhance the applicability of 1-RM test in clinical settings.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidade Estadual PaulistaMotriz: Revista de Educação Física v.22 n.3 20162016-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65742016000300133en10.1590/S1980-6574201600030003
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Sabino,George Schayer
Felício,Diogo Carvalho
Guimarães,Cristiano Queiroz
Abreu,Bento João da Graça Azevedo
Vieira,Wouber Hérickson de Brito
spellingShingle Sabino,George Schayer
Felício,Diogo Carvalho
Guimarães,Cristiano Queiroz
Abreu,Bento João da Graça Azevedo
Vieira,Wouber Hérickson de Brito
Validity analysis of one-repetition maximum strength test for determining the hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio
author_facet Sabino,George Schayer
Felício,Diogo Carvalho
Guimarães,Cristiano Queiroz
Abreu,Bento João da Graça Azevedo
Vieira,Wouber Hérickson de Brito
author_sort Sabino,George Schayer
title Validity analysis of one-repetition maximum strength test for determining the hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio
title_short Validity analysis of one-repetition maximum strength test for determining the hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio
title_full Validity analysis of one-repetition maximum strength test for determining the hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio
title_fullStr Validity analysis of one-repetition maximum strength test for determining the hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio
title_full_unstemmed Validity analysis of one-repetition maximum strength test for determining the hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio
title_sort validity analysis of one-repetition maximum strength test for determining the hamstrings-to-quadriceps ratio
description Abstract One of the approaches to evaluate injury prediction is the hamstrings-to-quadriceps peak torque conventional ratio (H:Q ratio). The gold standard for assessment of muscle strength in vivo is by isokinetic dynamometry; however, the one-repetition maximum strength test (1-RM) presents high correlation with isokinetic data. This study aimed to compare measures of H:Q ratio in young adults obtained by dynamometry and 1-RM testing. No significant differences were observed in the H:Q ratio when comparing 1-RM and dynamometry testing. However, there was a significant and strong correlation between the measurements obtained in the two tests. Despite this correlation, data from both tests are not equal as the H:Q ratio obtained from 1-RM test presents a systematic error. Nonetheless, the results can enhance the applicability of 1-RM test in clinical settings.
publisher Universidade Estadual Paulista
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65742016000300133
work_keys_str_mv AT sabinogeorgeschayer validityanalysisofonerepetitionmaximumstrengthtestfordeterminingthehamstringstoquadricepsratio
AT feliciodiogocarvalho validityanalysisofonerepetitionmaximumstrengthtestfordeterminingthehamstringstoquadricepsratio
AT guimaraescristianoqueiroz validityanalysisofonerepetitionmaximumstrengthtestfordeterminingthehamstringstoquadricepsratio
AT abreubentojoaodagracaazevedo validityanalysisofonerepetitionmaximumstrengthtestfordeterminingthehamstringstoquadricepsratio
AT vieirawouberhericksondebrito validityanalysisofonerepetitionmaximumstrengthtestfordeterminingthehamstringstoquadricepsratio
_version_ 1756434638373388288