Comparative assessment of root canal preparation by undergraduate students using manual and automated devices

PURPOSE: To evaluate the preparation of root canals performed by undergraduate students using manual and automated devices, based on the amount of dentin removed from the canal walls, the time required for preparation, and students' opinions. METHODS: Mesial roots of 20 human mandibular molars extracted for clinical reasons were used in the experiment. Twenty undergraduate students prepared two canals each, one using the manual method and the other using an automated device; following root canal preparation, the students filled out a questionnaire. Time was recorded throughout the procedures. Teeth were scanned with computed tomography before and after preparation. Images were superimposed and measured for the amount and area of dentin removed. RESULTS: There was no difference between the use of manual and automated devices with regard to the amount of material removed. Distal walls presented a greater amount of material removed from the cervical third when compared with middle third in both techniques. There were no statistically significant differences between both techniques with regard to preparation time. CONCLUSION: The automated system represents an adequate alternative option as an auxiliary resource for undergraduate teaching in the preparation of root canals.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vanzin,Andréa Cabral de Mello, Barletta,Fernando Branco, Fontanella,Vania
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul 2010
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65232010000100014
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1980-65232010000100014
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1980-652320100001000142011-08-26Comparative assessment of root canal preparation by undergraduate students using manual and automated devicesVanzin,Andréa Cabral de MelloBarletta,Fernando BrancoFontanella,Vania Endodontics instrumentation root canal therapy X-ray computed tomography PURPOSE: To evaluate the preparation of root canals performed by undergraduate students using manual and automated devices, based on the amount of dentin removed from the canal walls, the time required for preparation, and students' opinions. METHODS: Mesial roots of 20 human mandibular molars extracted for clinical reasons were used in the experiment. Twenty undergraduate students prepared two canals each, one using the manual method and the other using an automated device; following root canal preparation, the students filled out a questionnaire. Time was recorded throughout the procedures. Teeth were scanned with computed tomography before and after preparation. Images were superimposed and measured for the amount and area of dentin removed. RESULTS: There was no difference between the use of manual and automated devices with regard to the amount of material removed. Distal walls presented a greater amount of material removed from the cervical third when compared with middle third in both techniques. There were no statistically significant differences between both techniques with regard to preparation time. CONCLUSION: The automated system represents an adequate alternative option as an auxiliary resource for undergraduate teaching in the preparation of root canals.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do SulRevista Odonto Ciência v.25 n.1 20102010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65232010000100014en10.1590/S1980-65232010000100014
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Vanzin,Andréa Cabral de Mello
Barletta,Fernando Branco
Fontanella,Vania
spellingShingle Vanzin,Andréa Cabral de Mello
Barletta,Fernando Branco
Fontanella,Vania
Comparative assessment of root canal preparation by undergraduate students using manual and automated devices
author_facet Vanzin,Andréa Cabral de Mello
Barletta,Fernando Branco
Fontanella,Vania
author_sort Vanzin,Andréa Cabral de Mello
title Comparative assessment of root canal preparation by undergraduate students using manual and automated devices
title_short Comparative assessment of root canal preparation by undergraduate students using manual and automated devices
title_full Comparative assessment of root canal preparation by undergraduate students using manual and automated devices
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of root canal preparation by undergraduate students using manual and automated devices
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of root canal preparation by undergraduate students using manual and automated devices
title_sort comparative assessment of root canal preparation by undergraduate students using manual and automated devices
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the preparation of root canals performed by undergraduate students using manual and automated devices, based on the amount of dentin removed from the canal walls, the time required for preparation, and students' opinions. METHODS: Mesial roots of 20 human mandibular molars extracted for clinical reasons were used in the experiment. Twenty undergraduate students prepared two canals each, one using the manual method and the other using an automated device; following root canal preparation, the students filled out a questionnaire. Time was recorded throughout the procedures. Teeth were scanned with computed tomography before and after preparation. Images were superimposed and measured for the amount and area of dentin removed. RESULTS: There was no difference between the use of manual and automated devices with regard to the amount of material removed. Distal walls presented a greater amount of material removed from the cervical third when compared with middle third in both techniques. There were no statistically significant differences between both techniques with regard to preparation time. CONCLUSION: The automated system represents an adequate alternative option as an auxiliary resource for undergraduate teaching in the preparation of root canals.
publisher Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
publishDate 2010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1980-65232010000100014
work_keys_str_mv AT vanzinandreacabraldemello comparativeassessmentofrootcanalpreparationbyundergraduatestudentsusingmanualandautomateddevices
AT barlettafernandobranco comparativeassessmentofrootcanalpreparationbyundergraduatestudentsusingmanualandautomateddevices
AT fontanellavania comparativeassessmentofrootcanalpreparationbyundergraduatestudentsusingmanualandautomateddevices
_version_ 1756434548750548992