Reasons to live during a suicidal crisis: A case series with suicidal inpatients

Abstract: Background: Following experts' recommendations for a phenomenological approach to suicidal behavior, this study opted to focus on the life-protecting beliefs and values expressed by people in acute suicidal crisis. Method: 61 adults hospitalized in psychiatric emergency for suicidal crises were assessed in terms of reasons for living (RFL) and suicidality. Multiple correspondence analysis was used to discern groups of patients based on their RFL profiles. Group differences on suicidality were further examined. Results: 4 groups of patients were observed, emerging from RFL differences in "Survival and Coping Beliefs", "Fear of Social Disapproval", "Responsibility to Family" and "Child-Related Concerns". Profiles varied by gender but not age. We further observed that "Survival and Coping Beliefs" and "Moral Objections" are weakened during an acute suicidal crisis. Conclusions: These findings underline the clinical utility of evaluating RFL during a suicidal crisis, and that RFL may be useful to personalize case formulation during an emergency intervention. They could further increase therapeutic communication by connecting the individual to key psychological resources. Longitudinal studies are necessary to evaluate how the different groups identified in this study may yield specific post-emergency trajectories connected to specific clinical needs.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Besch,Vincent, Greiner,Christian, Le Hénaff,Catherine, Von Rohr-De Pree,Cécilia, Ambrosetti,Julia, Magnin,Charline, Poulet,Emmanuel, Debbané,Martin, Prada,Paco
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias 2024
Online Access:https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1886-144X2024000400002
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1886-144X2024000400002
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1886-144X20240004000022024-12-02Reasons to live during a suicidal crisis: A case series with suicidal inpatientsBesch,VincentGreiner,ChristianLe Hénaff,CatherineVon Rohr-De Pree,CéciliaAmbrosetti,JuliaMagnin,CharlinePoulet,EmmanuelDebbané,MartinPrada,Paco suicide suicidal behavior suicidal crisis reasons for living life-protective factor Abstract: Background: Following experts' recommendations for a phenomenological approach to suicidal behavior, this study opted to focus on the life-protecting beliefs and values expressed by people in acute suicidal crisis. Method: 61 adults hospitalized in psychiatric emergency for suicidal crises were assessed in terms of reasons for living (RFL) and suicidality. Multiple correspondence analysis was used to discern groups of patients based on their RFL profiles. Group differences on suicidality were further examined. Results: 4 groups of patients were observed, emerging from RFL differences in "Survival and Coping Beliefs", "Fear of Social Disapproval", "Responsibility to Family" and "Child-Related Concerns". Profiles varied by gender but not age. We further observed that "Survival and Coping Beliefs" and "Moral Objections" are weakened during an acute suicidal crisis. Conclusions: These findings underline the clinical utility of evaluating RFL during a suicidal crisis, and that RFL may be useful to personalize case formulation during an emergency intervention. They could further increase therapeutic communication by connecting the individual to key psychological resources. Longitudinal studies are necessary to evaluate how the different groups identified in this study may yield specific post-emergency trajectories connected to specific clinical needs.Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de AsturiasPsicothema v.36 n.4 20242024-01-01journal articletext/htmlhttps://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1886-144X2024000400002en
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country España
countrycode ES
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-es
tag revista
region Europa del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Besch,Vincent
Greiner,Christian
Le Hénaff,Catherine
Von Rohr-De Pree,Cécilia
Ambrosetti,Julia
Magnin,Charline
Poulet,Emmanuel
Debbané,Martin
Prada,Paco
spellingShingle Besch,Vincent
Greiner,Christian
Le Hénaff,Catherine
Von Rohr-De Pree,Cécilia
Ambrosetti,Julia
Magnin,Charline
Poulet,Emmanuel
Debbané,Martin
Prada,Paco
Reasons to live during a suicidal crisis: A case series with suicidal inpatients
author_facet Besch,Vincent
Greiner,Christian
Le Hénaff,Catherine
Von Rohr-De Pree,Cécilia
Ambrosetti,Julia
Magnin,Charline
Poulet,Emmanuel
Debbané,Martin
Prada,Paco
author_sort Besch,Vincent
title Reasons to live during a suicidal crisis: A case series with suicidal inpatients
title_short Reasons to live during a suicidal crisis: A case series with suicidal inpatients
title_full Reasons to live during a suicidal crisis: A case series with suicidal inpatients
title_fullStr Reasons to live during a suicidal crisis: A case series with suicidal inpatients
title_full_unstemmed Reasons to live during a suicidal crisis: A case series with suicidal inpatients
title_sort reasons to live during a suicidal crisis: a case series with suicidal inpatients
description Abstract: Background: Following experts' recommendations for a phenomenological approach to suicidal behavior, this study opted to focus on the life-protecting beliefs and values expressed by people in acute suicidal crisis. Method: 61 adults hospitalized in psychiatric emergency for suicidal crises were assessed in terms of reasons for living (RFL) and suicidality. Multiple correspondence analysis was used to discern groups of patients based on their RFL profiles. Group differences on suicidality were further examined. Results: 4 groups of patients were observed, emerging from RFL differences in "Survival and Coping Beliefs", "Fear of Social Disapproval", "Responsibility to Family" and "Child-Related Concerns". Profiles varied by gender but not age. We further observed that "Survival and Coping Beliefs" and "Moral Objections" are weakened during an acute suicidal crisis. Conclusions: These findings underline the clinical utility of evaluating RFL during a suicidal crisis, and that RFL may be useful to personalize case formulation during an emergency intervention. They could further increase therapeutic communication by connecting the individual to key psychological resources. Longitudinal studies are necessary to evaluate how the different groups identified in this study may yield specific post-emergency trajectories connected to specific clinical needs.
publisher Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos del Principado de Asturias
publishDate 2024
url https://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1886-144X2024000400002
work_keys_str_mv AT beschvincent reasonstoliveduringasuicidalcrisisacaseserieswithsuicidalinpatients
AT greinerchristian reasonstoliveduringasuicidalcrisisacaseserieswithsuicidalinpatients
AT lehenaffcatherine reasonstoliveduringasuicidalcrisisacaseserieswithsuicidalinpatients
AT vonrohrdepreececilia reasonstoliveduringasuicidalcrisisacaseserieswithsuicidalinpatients
AT ambrosettijulia reasonstoliveduringasuicidalcrisisacaseserieswithsuicidalinpatients
AT magnincharline reasonstoliveduringasuicidalcrisisacaseserieswithsuicidalinpatients
AT pouletemmanuel reasonstoliveduringasuicidalcrisisacaseserieswithsuicidalinpatients
AT debbanemartin reasonstoliveduringasuicidalcrisisacaseserieswithsuicidalinpatients
AT pradapaco reasonstoliveduringasuicidalcrisisacaseserieswithsuicidalinpatients
_version_ 1819155404887687168