Test-Retest of Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (P300) with Pure Tone and Speech Stimuli

Abstract Introduction Long latency auditory evoked potentials, especially P300, have been used for clinical evaluation of mental processing. Many factors can interfere with Auditory Evoked Potential - P300 results, suggesting large intra and inter-subject variations. Objective The objective of the study was to identify the reliability of P3 components (latency and amplitude) over 4-6 weeks and the most stable auditory stimulus with the best test-retest agreement. Methods Ten normal-hearing women participated in the study. Only subjects without auditory processing problems were included. To determine the P3 components, we elicited long latency auditory evoked potential (P300) by pure tone and speech stimuli, and retested after 4-6 weeks using the same parameters. We identified P300 latency and amplitude by waveform subtraction. Results We found lower coefficient of variation values in latency than in amplitude, with less variability analysis when speech stimulus was used. There was no significant correlation in latency measures between pure tone and speech stimuli, and sessions. There was a significant intrasubject correlation between measures of latency and amplitude. Conclusion These findings show that amplitude responses are more robust for the speech stimulus when compared with its pure tone counterpart. The P300 indicated stability for latency and amplitudemeasures when the test-retest was applied. Reliability was higher for amplitude than for latency, with better agreement when the pure tone stimulus was used. However, further research with speech stimulus is needed to clarify how these stimuli are processed by the nervous system.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Perez,Ana Paula, Ziliotto,Karin, Pereira,Liliane Desgualdo
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Fundação Otorrinolaringologia 2017
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642017000200134
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1809-48642017000200134
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1809-486420170002001342017-07-13Test-Retest of Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (P300) with Pure Tone and Speech StimuliPerez,Ana PaulaZiliotto,KarinPereira,Liliane Desgualdo event-related potentials auditory perception reliability evoked potentials Abstract Introduction Long latency auditory evoked potentials, especially P300, have been used for clinical evaluation of mental processing. Many factors can interfere with Auditory Evoked Potential - P300 results, suggesting large intra and inter-subject variations. Objective The objective of the study was to identify the reliability of P3 components (latency and amplitude) over 4-6 weeks and the most stable auditory stimulus with the best test-retest agreement. Methods Ten normal-hearing women participated in the study. Only subjects without auditory processing problems were included. To determine the P3 components, we elicited long latency auditory evoked potential (P300) by pure tone and speech stimuli, and retested after 4-6 weeks using the same parameters. We identified P300 latency and amplitude by waveform subtraction. Results We found lower coefficient of variation values in latency than in amplitude, with less variability analysis when speech stimulus was used. There was no significant correlation in latency measures between pure tone and speech stimuli, and sessions. There was a significant intrasubject correlation between measures of latency and amplitude. Conclusion These findings show that amplitude responses are more robust for the speech stimulus when compared with its pure tone counterpart. The P300 indicated stability for latency and amplitudemeasures when the test-retest was applied. Reliability was higher for amplitude than for latency, with better agreement when the pure tone stimulus was used. However, further research with speech stimulus is needed to clarify how these stimuli are processed by the nervous system.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFundação OtorrinolaringologiaInternational Archives of Otorhinolaryngology v.21 n.2 20172017-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642017000200134en10.1055/s-0036-1583527
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Perez,Ana Paula
Ziliotto,Karin
Pereira,Liliane Desgualdo
spellingShingle Perez,Ana Paula
Ziliotto,Karin
Pereira,Liliane Desgualdo
Test-Retest of Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (P300) with Pure Tone and Speech Stimuli
author_facet Perez,Ana Paula
Ziliotto,Karin
Pereira,Liliane Desgualdo
author_sort Perez,Ana Paula
title Test-Retest of Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (P300) with Pure Tone and Speech Stimuli
title_short Test-Retest of Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (P300) with Pure Tone and Speech Stimuli
title_full Test-Retest of Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (P300) with Pure Tone and Speech Stimuli
title_fullStr Test-Retest of Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (P300) with Pure Tone and Speech Stimuli
title_full_unstemmed Test-Retest of Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (P300) with Pure Tone and Speech Stimuli
title_sort test-retest of long latency auditory evoked potentials (p300) with pure tone and speech stimuli
description Abstract Introduction Long latency auditory evoked potentials, especially P300, have been used for clinical evaluation of mental processing. Many factors can interfere with Auditory Evoked Potential - P300 results, suggesting large intra and inter-subject variations. Objective The objective of the study was to identify the reliability of P3 components (latency and amplitude) over 4-6 weeks and the most stable auditory stimulus with the best test-retest agreement. Methods Ten normal-hearing women participated in the study. Only subjects without auditory processing problems were included. To determine the P3 components, we elicited long latency auditory evoked potential (P300) by pure tone and speech stimuli, and retested after 4-6 weeks using the same parameters. We identified P300 latency and amplitude by waveform subtraction. Results We found lower coefficient of variation values in latency than in amplitude, with less variability analysis when speech stimulus was used. There was no significant correlation in latency measures between pure tone and speech stimuli, and sessions. There was a significant intrasubject correlation between measures of latency and amplitude. Conclusion These findings show that amplitude responses are more robust for the speech stimulus when compared with its pure tone counterpart. The P300 indicated stability for latency and amplitudemeasures when the test-retest was applied. Reliability was higher for amplitude than for latency, with better agreement when the pure tone stimulus was used. However, further research with speech stimulus is needed to clarify how these stimuli are processed by the nervous system.
publisher Fundação Otorrinolaringologia
publishDate 2017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-48642017000200134
work_keys_str_mv AT perezanapaula testretestoflonglatencyauditoryevokedpotentialsp300withpuretoneandspeechstimuli
AT ziliottokarin testretestoflonglatencyauditoryevokedpotentialsp300withpuretoneandspeechstimuli
AT pereiralilianedesgualdo testretestoflonglatencyauditoryevokedpotentialsp300withpuretoneandspeechstimuli
_version_ 1756433642874208256