CLASSIFICATION OF LOW BACK PAIN INTO SUBGROUPS FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC CLARITY

ABSTRACT Objective To establish a classification in subgroups with symptoms and functionality involving volunteers with nonspecific chronic low back pain for better clarity of functional and therapeutic diagnostic definitions. Methods Observational, quantitative, cross-sectional study with population of 62 university students between 18 and 30 years of age, with a mean age of 21.40 (± 2.40) years, presenting nonspecific lumbar pain for more than three months. Three questionnaires were used for the division into subgroups: STarT Back Screening, the Oswestry Disability Index, and FABQ-Brasil, the VAS evaluation, orthopedic tests: Lasègue’s, Slump test, de Sèze test, Valsalva maneuver, and evaluation of the pain threshold of the right and left iliocostal lumbar muscles. Results All the volunteers included in the study had chronic back pain. Most of them (50%) had normal body mass index, 54.8% were sedentary, and of those who were physically active, 14.5% did body building. The Slump test (35.5%) proved to be more reliable than Lasègue’s test (21%). In the evaluation, the volunteers reported moderate pain intensity (72.6%) and the mean pressure pain threshold was 6.37 kgf and 6.14 kgf for the right and left iliocostal muscles, respectively. In the questionnaires, 85.5% had a low-risk score, that is, a good prognosis for pain treatment, and 91.9% had minimum disability. The largest treatment hypothesis group was stabilization (29.0%). Conclusion The method of treatment subgroup classification is a guide towards better semiological perspectives and the definition of the clinically preferred physiotherapeutic treatment for each case. Level of Evidence III; Diagnostic study.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ELIAS,JULIANA PEREIRA, LONGEN,WILLIANS CASSIANO
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512020000100034
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1808-18512020000100034
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1808-185120200001000342020-03-11CLASSIFICATION OF LOW BACK PAIN INTO SUBGROUPS FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC CLARITYELIAS,JULIANA PEREIRALONGEN,WILLIANS CASSIANO Low back pain Chronic pain Pain Threshold Treatment Classification ABSTRACT Objective To establish a classification in subgroups with symptoms and functionality involving volunteers with nonspecific chronic low back pain for better clarity of functional and therapeutic diagnostic definitions. Methods Observational, quantitative, cross-sectional study with population of 62 university students between 18 and 30 years of age, with a mean age of 21.40 (± 2.40) years, presenting nonspecific lumbar pain for more than three months. Three questionnaires were used for the division into subgroups: STarT Back Screening, the Oswestry Disability Index, and FABQ-Brasil, the VAS evaluation, orthopedic tests: Lasègue’s, Slump test, de Sèze test, Valsalva maneuver, and evaluation of the pain threshold of the right and left iliocostal lumbar muscles. Results All the volunteers included in the study had chronic back pain. Most of them (50%) had normal body mass index, 54.8% were sedentary, and of those who were physically active, 14.5% did body building. The Slump test (35.5%) proved to be more reliable than Lasègue’s test (21%). In the evaluation, the volunteers reported moderate pain intensity (72.6%) and the mean pressure pain threshold was 6.37 kgf and 6.14 kgf for the right and left iliocostal muscles, respectively. In the questionnaires, 85.5% had a low-risk score, that is, a good prognosis for pain treatment, and 91.9% had minimum disability. The largest treatment hypothesis group was stabilization (29.0%). Conclusion The method of treatment subgroup classification is a guide towards better semiological perspectives and the definition of the clinically preferred physiotherapeutic treatment for each case. Level of Evidence III; Diagnostic study.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de ColunaColuna/Columna v.19 n.1 20202020-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512020000100034en10.1590/s1808-185120201901206442
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author ELIAS,JULIANA PEREIRA
LONGEN,WILLIANS CASSIANO
spellingShingle ELIAS,JULIANA PEREIRA
LONGEN,WILLIANS CASSIANO
CLASSIFICATION OF LOW BACK PAIN INTO SUBGROUPS FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC CLARITY
author_facet ELIAS,JULIANA PEREIRA
LONGEN,WILLIANS CASSIANO
author_sort ELIAS,JULIANA PEREIRA
title CLASSIFICATION OF LOW BACK PAIN INTO SUBGROUPS FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC CLARITY
title_short CLASSIFICATION OF LOW BACK PAIN INTO SUBGROUPS FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC CLARITY
title_full CLASSIFICATION OF LOW BACK PAIN INTO SUBGROUPS FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC CLARITY
title_fullStr CLASSIFICATION OF LOW BACK PAIN INTO SUBGROUPS FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC CLARITY
title_full_unstemmed CLASSIFICATION OF LOW BACK PAIN INTO SUBGROUPS FOR DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC CLARITY
title_sort classification of low back pain into subgroups for diagnostic and therapeutic clarity
description ABSTRACT Objective To establish a classification in subgroups with symptoms and functionality involving volunteers with nonspecific chronic low back pain for better clarity of functional and therapeutic diagnostic definitions. Methods Observational, quantitative, cross-sectional study with population of 62 university students between 18 and 30 years of age, with a mean age of 21.40 (± 2.40) years, presenting nonspecific lumbar pain for more than three months. Three questionnaires were used for the division into subgroups: STarT Back Screening, the Oswestry Disability Index, and FABQ-Brasil, the VAS evaluation, orthopedic tests: Lasègue’s, Slump test, de Sèze test, Valsalva maneuver, and evaluation of the pain threshold of the right and left iliocostal lumbar muscles. Results All the volunteers included in the study had chronic back pain. Most of them (50%) had normal body mass index, 54.8% were sedentary, and of those who were physically active, 14.5% did body building. The Slump test (35.5%) proved to be more reliable than Lasègue’s test (21%). In the evaluation, the volunteers reported moderate pain intensity (72.6%) and the mean pressure pain threshold was 6.37 kgf and 6.14 kgf for the right and left iliocostal muscles, respectively. In the questionnaires, 85.5% had a low-risk score, that is, a good prognosis for pain treatment, and 91.9% had minimum disability. The largest treatment hypothesis group was stabilization (29.0%). Conclusion The method of treatment subgroup classification is a guide towards better semiological perspectives and the definition of the clinically preferred physiotherapeutic treatment for each case. Level of Evidence III; Diagnostic study.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512020000100034
work_keys_str_mv AT eliasjulianapereira classificationoflowbackpainintosubgroupsfordiagnosticandtherapeuticclarity
AT longenwillianscassiano classificationoflowbackpainintosubgroupsfordiagnosticandtherapeuticclarity
_version_ 1756433009596170240