TLIF-MIS VS TLIF-OPEN: COST EVALUATION

ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the direct costs of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or open technique (OPEN). Methods: The present study is descriptive and retrospective. Sixteen patients with degenerative spinal pathology operated on with the TLIF MIS technique and TLIF OPEN were included over a 13-month period. Days of hospital stay, blood loss, surgical time, medical care and costs were compared. Results: The mean number of days of hospital stay was 6.7 ± 4.3 days with TLIF MIS and 11.1 ± 6.5 days with TLIF OPEN. The blood loss was 307 ± 81.6 ml (range 200400 ml) with TLIF MIS and 803 ± 701.3 ml (range 200-1800 ml) with TLIF OPEN. The surgical time was 320 ± 92.6 minutes (range 210-500 minutes) in TLIF MIS and 372 ± 95.2 minutes (280-540 minutes) in TLIF OPEN. Conclusions: The difference in surgical costs and time between the two procedures was not statistically significant. There was less bleeding during the TLIF-MIS surgery, as well as a correlation between shorter days of hospital stay proportional to bleeding and surgical time, which translates into a reduction in the cost of these items. Level of Evidence III; Analysis based on alternatives and limited costs.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luna,Luis Muñiz, Sánchez,Rodolfo Echeagaray, Heredia,Marco Antonio Marbán, Stone,Karen Aida Ibarra, Chiang,Erika Silva
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna 2018
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000200138
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1808-18512018000200138
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1808-185120180002001382018-08-10TLIF-MIS VS TLIF-OPEN: COST EVALUATIONLuna,Luis MuñizSánchez,Rodolfo EcheagarayHeredia,Marco Antonio MarbánStone,Karen Aida IbarraChiang,Erika Silva Intervertebral disc degeneration Spinal fusion Arthrodesis ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the direct costs of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or open technique (OPEN). Methods: The present study is descriptive and retrospective. Sixteen patients with degenerative spinal pathology operated on with the TLIF MIS technique and TLIF OPEN were included over a 13-month period. Days of hospital stay, blood loss, surgical time, medical care and costs were compared. Results: The mean number of days of hospital stay was 6.7 ± 4.3 days with TLIF MIS and 11.1 ± 6.5 days with TLIF OPEN. The blood loss was 307 ± 81.6 ml (range 200400 ml) with TLIF MIS and 803 ± 701.3 ml (range 200-1800 ml) with TLIF OPEN. The surgical time was 320 ± 92.6 minutes (range 210-500 minutes) in TLIF MIS and 372 ± 95.2 minutes (280-540 minutes) in TLIF OPEN. Conclusions: The difference in surgical costs and time between the two procedures was not statistically significant. There was less bleeding during the TLIF-MIS surgery, as well as a correlation between shorter days of hospital stay proportional to bleeding and surgical time, which translates into a reduction in the cost of these items. Level of Evidence III; Analysis based on alternatives and limited costs.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de ColunaColuna/Columna v.17 n.2 20182018-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000200138en10.1590/s1808-185120181702189439
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Luna,Luis Muñiz
Sánchez,Rodolfo Echeagaray
Heredia,Marco Antonio Marbán
Stone,Karen Aida Ibarra
Chiang,Erika Silva
spellingShingle Luna,Luis Muñiz
Sánchez,Rodolfo Echeagaray
Heredia,Marco Antonio Marbán
Stone,Karen Aida Ibarra
Chiang,Erika Silva
TLIF-MIS VS TLIF-OPEN: COST EVALUATION
author_facet Luna,Luis Muñiz
Sánchez,Rodolfo Echeagaray
Heredia,Marco Antonio Marbán
Stone,Karen Aida Ibarra
Chiang,Erika Silva
author_sort Luna,Luis Muñiz
title TLIF-MIS VS TLIF-OPEN: COST EVALUATION
title_short TLIF-MIS VS TLIF-OPEN: COST EVALUATION
title_full TLIF-MIS VS TLIF-OPEN: COST EVALUATION
title_fullStr TLIF-MIS VS TLIF-OPEN: COST EVALUATION
title_full_unstemmed TLIF-MIS VS TLIF-OPEN: COST EVALUATION
title_sort tlif-mis vs tlif-open: cost evaluation
description ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate the direct costs of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) or open technique (OPEN). Methods: The present study is descriptive and retrospective. Sixteen patients with degenerative spinal pathology operated on with the TLIF MIS technique and TLIF OPEN were included over a 13-month period. Days of hospital stay, blood loss, surgical time, medical care and costs were compared. Results: The mean number of days of hospital stay was 6.7 ± 4.3 days with TLIF MIS and 11.1 ± 6.5 days with TLIF OPEN. The blood loss was 307 ± 81.6 ml (range 200400 ml) with TLIF MIS and 803 ± 701.3 ml (range 200-1800 ml) with TLIF OPEN. The surgical time was 320 ± 92.6 minutes (range 210-500 minutes) in TLIF MIS and 372 ± 95.2 minutes (280-540 minutes) in TLIF OPEN. Conclusions: The difference in surgical costs and time between the two procedures was not statistically significant. There was less bleeding during the TLIF-MIS surgery, as well as a correlation between shorter days of hospital stay proportional to bleeding and surgical time, which translates into a reduction in the cost of these items. Level of Evidence III; Analysis based on alternatives and limited costs.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publishDate 2018
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512018000200138
work_keys_str_mv AT lunaluismuniz tlifmisvstlifopencostevaluation
AT sanchezrodolfoecheagaray tlifmisvstlifopencostevaluation
AT herediamarcoantoniomarban tlifmisvstlifopencostevaluation
AT stonekarenaidaibarra tlifmisvstlifopencostevaluation
AT chiangerikasilva tlifmisvstlifopencostevaluation
_version_ 1756432995575660544