Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in Brazil

OBJECTIVES: Cirrhotic patients must receive an abdominal ultrasound every 6 months as part of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening. The aim of this study was to assess if HCC screening was performed as recommended by the literature and to observe the differences between the private and public services in Brazil. METHODS: We analyzed data from the HCC screenings of 253 cirrhotic patients from the University Hospital (n=177) and private sector (n=76) in Vitória, ES, Brazil. RESULTS: Ultrasound screening was performed every 13.1 months on average (SD 9.02). In 37 out of 253 patients, the screenings were performed close to the recommended frequency; 16 were performed every 6 months, and 21 were mostly performed during the follow-up period every 6 months. In the remaining 216 cases, ultrasounds were not performed according to the guidelines; for 106 patients, less than 50% of all ultrasounds were performed every 6 months and 110 patients showed an interval greater than one year. Patients from the private sector received ultrasound screenings near the ideal in 28.9% of cases, while patients from the University Hospital received ultrasounds in only 8.4% of cases (p<0.0001). HCC was diagnosed in 30 patients (11.8%). For these 30 patients, 11 screenings were properly performed within 6 months (36.6%) and only 1 out of the 11 (9%) met the criteria for transplant. In the remaining 19 patients who did not receive the screening within 6 months, 6 (31.5%) did not meet the criteria for transplant. CONCLUSION: HCC screening in our environment was irregularly performed, mainly in the public service setting, which prevented early diagnosis in a large number of patients.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Signorelli,Izabelle Venturini, Gonçalves,Patrícia Lofêgo, Gonçalves,Luciana Lofêgo, Ferreira,Luiz Sérgio Emery, Mendonça,Ana Tereza Parpaiola, Franklin,Gustavo Leite, Gomes,Maria da Penha Zago
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322016000700361
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1807-59322016000700361
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1807-593220160007003612016-07-18Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in BrazilSignorelli,Izabelle VenturiniGonçalves,Patrícia LofêgoGonçalves,Luciana LofêgoFerreira,Luiz Sérgio EmeryMendonça,Ana Tereza ParpaiolaFranklin,Gustavo LeiteGomes,Maria da Penha Zago Hepatocellular Carcinoma Mass Screening Diagnosis Liver Cirrhosis OBJECTIVES: Cirrhotic patients must receive an abdominal ultrasound every 6 months as part of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening. The aim of this study was to assess if HCC screening was performed as recommended by the literature and to observe the differences between the private and public services in Brazil. METHODS: We analyzed data from the HCC screenings of 253 cirrhotic patients from the University Hospital (n=177) and private sector (n=76) in Vitória, ES, Brazil. RESULTS: Ultrasound screening was performed every 13.1 months on average (SD 9.02). In 37 out of 253 patients, the screenings were performed close to the recommended frequency; 16 were performed every 6 months, and 21 were mostly performed during the follow-up period every 6 months. In the remaining 216 cases, ultrasounds were not performed according to the guidelines; for 106 patients, less than 50% of all ultrasounds were performed every 6 months and 110 patients showed an interval greater than one year. Patients from the private sector received ultrasound screenings near the ideal in 28.9% of cases, while patients from the University Hospital received ultrasounds in only 8.4% of cases (p<0.0001). HCC was diagnosed in 30 patients (11.8%). For these 30 patients, 11 screenings were properly performed within 6 months (36.6%) and only 1 out of the 11 (9%) met the criteria for transplant. In the remaining 19 patients who did not receive the screening within 6 months, 6 (31.5%) did not meet the criteria for transplant. CONCLUSION: HCC screening in our environment was irregularly performed, mainly in the public service setting, which prevented early diagnosis in a large number of patients.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade de Medicina / USPClinics v.71 n.7 20162016-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322016000700361en10.6061/clinics/2016(07)01
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Signorelli,Izabelle Venturini
Gonçalves,Patrícia Lofêgo
Gonçalves,Luciana Lofêgo
Ferreira,Luiz Sérgio Emery
Mendonça,Ana Tereza Parpaiola
Franklin,Gustavo Leite
Gomes,Maria da Penha Zago
spellingShingle Signorelli,Izabelle Venturini
Gonçalves,Patrícia Lofêgo
Gonçalves,Luciana Lofêgo
Ferreira,Luiz Sérgio Emery
Mendonça,Ana Tereza Parpaiola
Franklin,Gustavo Leite
Gomes,Maria da Penha Zago
Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in Brazil
author_facet Signorelli,Izabelle Venturini
Gonçalves,Patrícia Lofêgo
Gonçalves,Luciana Lofêgo
Ferreira,Luiz Sérgio Emery
Mendonça,Ana Tereza Parpaiola
Franklin,Gustavo Leite
Gomes,Maria da Penha Zago
author_sort Signorelli,Izabelle Venturini
title Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in Brazil
title_short Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in Brazil
title_full Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in Brazil
title_fullStr Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in Brazil
title_sort socioeconomic disparities in access to a hepatocellular carcinoma screening program in brazil
description OBJECTIVES: Cirrhotic patients must receive an abdominal ultrasound every 6 months as part of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening. The aim of this study was to assess if HCC screening was performed as recommended by the literature and to observe the differences between the private and public services in Brazil. METHODS: We analyzed data from the HCC screenings of 253 cirrhotic patients from the University Hospital (n=177) and private sector (n=76) in Vitória, ES, Brazil. RESULTS: Ultrasound screening was performed every 13.1 months on average (SD 9.02). In 37 out of 253 patients, the screenings were performed close to the recommended frequency; 16 were performed every 6 months, and 21 were mostly performed during the follow-up period every 6 months. In the remaining 216 cases, ultrasounds were not performed according to the guidelines; for 106 patients, less than 50% of all ultrasounds were performed every 6 months and 110 patients showed an interval greater than one year. Patients from the private sector received ultrasound screenings near the ideal in 28.9% of cases, while patients from the University Hospital received ultrasounds in only 8.4% of cases (p<0.0001). HCC was diagnosed in 30 patients (11.8%). For these 30 patients, 11 screenings were properly performed within 6 months (36.6%) and only 1 out of the 11 (9%) met the criteria for transplant. In the remaining 19 patients who did not receive the screening within 6 months, 6 (31.5%) did not meet the criteria for transplant. CONCLUSION: HCC screening in our environment was irregularly performed, mainly in the public service setting, which prevented early diagnosis in a large number of patients.
publisher Faculdade de Medicina / USP
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322016000700361
work_keys_str_mv AT signorelliizabelleventurini socioeconomicdisparitiesinaccesstoahepatocellularcarcinomascreeningprograminbrazil
AT goncalvespatricialofego socioeconomicdisparitiesinaccesstoahepatocellularcarcinomascreeningprograminbrazil
AT goncalveslucianalofego socioeconomicdisparitiesinaccesstoahepatocellularcarcinomascreeningprograminbrazil
AT ferreiraluizsergioemery socioeconomicdisparitiesinaccesstoahepatocellularcarcinomascreeningprograminbrazil
AT mendoncaanaterezaparpaiola socioeconomicdisparitiesinaccesstoahepatocellularcarcinomascreeningprograminbrazil
AT franklingustavoleite socioeconomicdisparitiesinaccesstoahepatocellularcarcinomascreeningprograminbrazil
AT gomesmariadapenhazago socioeconomicdisparitiesinaccesstoahepatocellularcarcinomascreeningprograminbrazil
_version_ 1756432276264058880