Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we compared the performance of both fluent speakers and people who stutter in three different speaking situations: monologue speech, oral reading and choral reading. This study follows the assumption that the neuromotor control of speech can be influenced by external auditory stimuli in both speakers who stutter and speakers who do not stutter. METHOD: Seventeen adults who stutter and seventeen adults who do not stutter were assessed in three speaking tasks: monologue, oral reading (solo reading aloud) and choral reading (reading in unison with the evaluator). Speech fluency and rate were measured for each task. RESULTS: The participants who stuttered had a lower frequency of stuttering during choral reading than during monologue and oral reading. CONCLUSIONS: According to the dual premotor system model, choral speech enhanced fluency by providing external cues for the timing of each syllable compensating for deficient internal cues.
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculdade de Medicina / USP
2016
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322016000300152 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S1807-59322016000300152 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S1807-593220160003001522016-04-08Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutterRitto,Ana PaulaCosta,Julia BiancalanaJuste,Fabiola StaróboleAndrade,Claudia Regina Furquim de Speech Stuttering Models, Neurological Feedback, Sensory OBJECTIVES: In this study, we compared the performance of both fluent speakers and people who stutter in three different speaking situations: monologue speech, oral reading and choral reading. This study follows the assumption that the neuromotor control of speech can be influenced by external auditory stimuli in both speakers who stutter and speakers who do not stutter. METHOD: Seventeen adults who stutter and seventeen adults who do not stutter were assessed in three speaking tasks: monologue, oral reading (solo reading aloud) and choral reading (reading in unison with the evaluator). Speech fluency and rate were measured for each task. RESULTS: The participants who stuttered had a lower frequency of stuttering during choral reading than during monologue and oral reading. CONCLUSIONS: According to the dual premotor system model, choral speech enhanced fluency by providing external cues for the timing of each syllable compensating for deficient internal cues.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade de Medicina / USPClinics v.71 n.3 20162016-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322016000300152en10.6061/clinics/2016(03)06 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Ritto,Ana Paula Costa,Julia Biancalana Juste,Fabiola Staróbole Andrade,Claudia Regina Furquim de |
spellingShingle |
Ritto,Ana Paula Costa,Julia Biancalana Juste,Fabiola Staróbole Andrade,Claudia Regina Furquim de Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter |
author_facet |
Ritto,Ana Paula Costa,Julia Biancalana Juste,Fabiola Staróbole Andrade,Claudia Regina Furquim de |
author_sort |
Ritto,Ana Paula |
title |
Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter |
title_short |
Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter |
title_full |
Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter |
title_sort |
comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter |
description |
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we compared the performance of both fluent speakers and people who stutter in three different speaking situations: monologue speech, oral reading and choral reading. This study follows the assumption that the neuromotor control of speech can be influenced by external auditory stimuli in both speakers who stutter and speakers who do not stutter. METHOD: Seventeen adults who stutter and seventeen adults who do not stutter were assessed in three speaking tasks: monologue, oral reading (solo reading aloud) and choral reading (reading in unison with the evaluator). Speech fluency and rate were measured for each task. RESULTS: The participants who stuttered had a lower frequency of stuttering during choral reading than during monologue and oral reading. CONCLUSIONS: According to the dual premotor system model, choral speech enhanced fluency by providing external cues for the timing of each syllable compensating for deficient internal cues. |
publisher |
Faculdade de Medicina / USP |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322016000300152 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rittoanapaula comparisonofdifferentspeechtasksamongadultswhostutterandadultswhodonotstutter AT costajuliabiancalana comparisonofdifferentspeechtasksamongadultswhostutterandadultswhodonotstutter AT justefabiolastarobole comparisonofdifferentspeechtasksamongadultswhostutterandadultswhodonotstutter AT andradeclaudiareginafurquimde comparisonofdifferentspeechtasksamongadultswhostutterandadultswhodonotstutter |
_version_ |
1756432271309537280 |