Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we compared the performance of both fluent speakers and people who stutter in three different speaking situations: monologue speech, oral reading and choral reading. This study follows the assumption that the neuromotor control of speech can be influenced by external auditory stimuli in both speakers who stutter and speakers who do not stutter. METHOD: Seventeen adults who stutter and seventeen adults who do not stutter were assessed in three speaking tasks: monologue, oral reading (solo reading aloud) and choral reading (reading in unison with the evaluator). Speech fluency and rate were measured for each task. RESULTS: The participants who stuttered had a lower frequency of stuttering during choral reading than during monologue and oral reading. CONCLUSIONS: According to the dual premotor system model, choral speech enhanced fluency by providing external cues for the timing of each syllable compensating for deficient internal cues.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ritto,Ana Paula, Costa,Julia Biancalana, Juste,Fabiola Staróbole, Andrade,Claudia Regina Furquim de
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade de Medicina / USP 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322016000300152
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1807-59322016000300152
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1807-593220160003001522016-04-08Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutterRitto,Ana PaulaCosta,Julia BiancalanaJuste,Fabiola StaróboleAndrade,Claudia Regina Furquim de Speech Stuttering Models, Neurological Feedback, Sensory OBJECTIVES: In this study, we compared the performance of both fluent speakers and people who stutter in three different speaking situations: monologue speech, oral reading and choral reading. This study follows the assumption that the neuromotor control of speech can be influenced by external auditory stimuli in both speakers who stutter and speakers who do not stutter. METHOD: Seventeen adults who stutter and seventeen adults who do not stutter were assessed in three speaking tasks: monologue, oral reading (solo reading aloud) and choral reading (reading in unison with the evaluator). Speech fluency and rate were measured for each task. RESULTS: The participants who stuttered had a lower frequency of stuttering during choral reading than during monologue and oral reading. CONCLUSIONS: According to the dual premotor system model, choral speech enhanced fluency by providing external cues for the timing of each syllable compensating for deficient internal cues.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade de Medicina / USPClinics v.71 n.3 20162016-03-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322016000300152en10.6061/clinics/2016(03)06
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Ritto,Ana Paula
Costa,Julia Biancalana
Juste,Fabiola Staróbole
Andrade,Claudia Regina Furquim de
spellingShingle Ritto,Ana Paula
Costa,Julia Biancalana
Juste,Fabiola Staróbole
Andrade,Claudia Regina Furquim de
Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter
author_facet Ritto,Ana Paula
Costa,Julia Biancalana
Juste,Fabiola Staróbole
Andrade,Claudia Regina Furquim de
author_sort Ritto,Ana Paula
title Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter
title_short Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter
title_full Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter
title_fullStr Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter
title_sort comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter
description OBJECTIVES: In this study, we compared the performance of both fluent speakers and people who stutter in three different speaking situations: monologue speech, oral reading and choral reading. This study follows the assumption that the neuromotor control of speech can be influenced by external auditory stimuli in both speakers who stutter and speakers who do not stutter. METHOD: Seventeen adults who stutter and seventeen adults who do not stutter were assessed in three speaking tasks: monologue, oral reading (solo reading aloud) and choral reading (reading in unison with the evaluator). Speech fluency and rate were measured for each task. RESULTS: The participants who stuttered had a lower frequency of stuttering during choral reading than during monologue and oral reading. CONCLUSIONS: According to the dual premotor system model, choral speech enhanced fluency by providing external cues for the timing of each syllable compensating for deficient internal cues.
publisher Faculdade de Medicina / USP
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-59322016000300152
work_keys_str_mv AT rittoanapaula comparisonofdifferentspeechtasksamongadultswhostutterandadultswhodonotstutter
AT costajuliabiancalana comparisonofdifferentspeechtasksamongadultswhostutterandadultswhodonotstutter
AT justefabiolastarobole comparisonofdifferentspeechtasksamongadultswhostutterandadultswhodonotstutter
AT andradeclaudiareginafurquimde comparisonofdifferentspeechtasksamongadultswhostutterandadultswhodonotstutter
_version_ 1756432271309537280