Comparison of two methods of dental prophylaxis: evaluation of arterial pressure and patient comfort in a clinical randomized controlled trial

Abstract Introduction The number of hypertensive patients is increasing and prophylaxis with bicarbonate jet are widely performed in clinical practice using large amounts of this substance in a short period of time, which may lead to increased arterial pressure. In the literature there are several studies that analyze the effect of sodium bicarbonate jet on the biofilm and dental structures, but not report the effect on arterial pressure. Aim Evaluated the change in arterial pressure before and after two procedures of dental prophylaxis, jet baking soda application and conventional prophylaxis, and patient opinion of the comfort of each system was obtained. Material and method We selected 20 patients aged 18 to 30 in need of prophylaxis to remove biofilm. The patients were placed into three different treatment groups: sodium bicarbonate jet (G1), conventional prophylaxis (G2) and control (G3), with a one month interval between treatments. Patients were divided into groups randomly. Measurements were performed immediately before and after the procedure, 15 and 30 minutes after the end of treatment. Patient comfort was measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the end of each treatment. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance. Result There was a statistically significant difference in the comfort of the procedures, with G2 and G3 being better than G1. Additionally, an increase in the diastolic blood pressure was observed in sodium bicarbonate jet group evaluated just after the procedure. Conclusion The conventional prophylaxis is more comfortable from the patient stand point and does not alter arterial pressure.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: FERREIRA,Camila Lopes, SANTOS,Lucio Murilo dos, MELO FILHO,Antonio Braulino de, SANTAMARIA,Mauro Pedrine, JARDINI,Maria Aparecida Neves
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000300177
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1807-25772016000300177
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1807-257720160003001772016-06-22Comparison of two methods of dental prophylaxis: evaluation of arterial pressure and patient comfort in a clinical randomized controlled trialFERREIRA,Camila LopesSANTOS,Lucio Murilo dosMELO FILHO,Antonio Braulino deSANTAMARIA,Mauro PedrineJARDINI,Maria Aparecida Neves Dental prophylaxis bicarbonate sodium arterial pressure clinical trial Abstract Introduction The number of hypertensive patients is increasing and prophylaxis with bicarbonate jet are widely performed in clinical practice using large amounts of this substance in a short period of time, which may lead to increased arterial pressure. In the literature there are several studies that analyze the effect of sodium bicarbonate jet on the biofilm and dental structures, but not report the effect on arterial pressure. Aim Evaluated the change in arterial pressure before and after two procedures of dental prophylaxis, jet baking soda application and conventional prophylaxis, and patient opinion of the comfort of each system was obtained. Material and method We selected 20 patients aged 18 to 30 in need of prophylaxis to remove biofilm. The patients were placed into three different treatment groups: sodium bicarbonate jet (G1), conventional prophylaxis (G2) and control (G3), with a one month interval between treatments. Patients were divided into groups randomly. Measurements were performed immediately before and after the procedure, 15 and 30 minutes after the end of treatment. Patient comfort was measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the end of each treatment. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance. Result There was a statistically significant difference in the comfort of the procedures, with G2 and G3 being better than G1. Additionally, an increase in the diastolic blood pressure was observed in sodium bicarbonate jet group evaluated just after the procedure. Conclusion The conventional prophylaxis is more comfortable from the patient stand point and does not alter arterial pressure.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita FilhoRevista de Odontologia da UNESP v.45 n.3 20162016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000300177en10.1590/1807-2577.17615
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author FERREIRA,Camila Lopes
SANTOS,Lucio Murilo dos
MELO FILHO,Antonio Braulino de
SANTAMARIA,Mauro Pedrine
JARDINI,Maria Aparecida Neves
spellingShingle FERREIRA,Camila Lopes
SANTOS,Lucio Murilo dos
MELO FILHO,Antonio Braulino de
SANTAMARIA,Mauro Pedrine
JARDINI,Maria Aparecida Neves
Comparison of two methods of dental prophylaxis: evaluation of arterial pressure and patient comfort in a clinical randomized controlled trial
author_facet FERREIRA,Camila Lopes
SANTOS,Lucio Murilo dos
MELO FILHO,Antonio Braulino de
SANTAMARIA,Mauro Pedrine
JARDINI,Maria Aparecida Neves
author_sort FERREIRA,Camila Lopes
title Comparison of two methods of dental prophylaxis: evaluation of arterial pressure and patient comfort in a clinical randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of two methods of dental prophylaxis: evaluation of arterial pressure and patient comfort in a clinical randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of two methods of dental prophylaxis: evaluation of arterial pressure and patient comfort in a clinical randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of two methods of dental prophylaxis: evaluation of arterial pressure and patient comfort in a clinical randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two methods of dental prophylaxis: evaluation of arterial pressure and patient comfort in a clinical randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of two methods of dental prophylaxis: evaluation of arterial pressure and patient comfort in a clinical randomized controlled trial
description Abstract Introduction The number of hypertensive patients is increasing and prophylaxis with bicarbonate jet are widely performed in clinical practice using large amounts of this substance in a short period of time, which may lead to increased arterial pressure. In the literature there are several studies that analyze the effect of sodium bicarbonate jet on the biofilm and dental structures, but not report the effect on arterial pressure. Aim Evaluated the change in arterial pressure before and after two procedures of dental prophylaxis, jet baking soda application and conventional prophylaxis, and patient opinion of the comfort of each system was obtained. Material and method We selected 20 patients aged 18 to 30 in need of prophylaxis to remove biofilm. The patients were placed into three different treatment groups: sodium bicarbonate jet (G1), conventional prophylaxis (G2) and control (G3), with a one month interval between treatments. Patients were divided into groups randomly. Measurements were performed immediately before and after the procedure, 15 and 30 minutes after the end of treatment. Patient comfort was measured using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at the end of each treatment. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance. Result There was a statistically significant difference in the comfort of the procedures, with G2 and G3 being better than G1. Additionally, an increase in the diastolic blood pressure was observed in sodium bicarbonate jet group evaluated just after the procedure. Conclusion The conventional prophylaxis is more comfortable from the patient stand point and does not alter arterial pressure.
publisher Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000300177
work_keys_str_mv AT ferreiracamilalopes comparisonoftwomethodsofdentalprophylaxisevaluationofarterialpressureandpatientcomfortinaclinicalrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT santosluciomurilodos comparisonoftwomethodsofdentalprophylaxisevaluationofarterialpressureandpatientcomfortinaclinicalrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT melofilhoantoniobraulinode comparisonoftwomethodsofdentalprophylaxisevaluationofarterialpressureandpatientcomfortinaclinicalrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT santamariamauropedrine comparisonoftwomethodsofdentalprophylaxisevaluationofarterialpressureandpatientcomfortinaclinicalrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jardinimariaaparecidaneves comparisonoftwomethodsofdentalprophylaxisevaluationofarterialpressureandpatientcomfortinaclinicalrandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1756431849913057280