Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has been considered a suitable material for cranioplasty. However, no consensus has been reached concerning the best material for cranioplasty with regard to minimizing complications. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the complication rates of PMMA with those of autologous bone and titanium mesh. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016042725). Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The focus question was, “Do PMMA prostheses used in cranioplasty have complications rates similar to those of autologous bone and titanium mesh?” A meta-analysis of complication rates was performed on the basis of dichotomous outcomes assessed by risk ratio (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). From 1014 data sources, 11 articles were selected according to eligibility criteria. These articles involved 1,256 individuals and 1,278 cranioplasties using autologous bone (n = 408), PMMA (n = 379), or titanium (n = 151). The follow-up period ranged from 63 days to 54.3 months. No difference was observed between the complication rates of PMMA and autologous bone (p = 0.94; RR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.54–1.75) or between PMMA and titanium (p = 0.38; RR, 1.59; 95%CI, 0.57–4.48). Sub-analysis of the reasons for craniotomy (trauma/non-trauma) was conducted, which revealed no significant difference (p = 0.91; RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.37–2.42). The meta-analysis indicated that the use of PMMA yields complication rates that are near those of autologous bone and titanium mesh.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LEÃO,Rafaella de Souza, MAIOR,Juliana Raposo Souto, LEMOS,Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo, VASCONCELOS,Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito, MONTES,Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende, PELLIZZER,Eduardo Piza, MORAES,Sandra Lúcia Dantas
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO 2018
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100402
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1806-83242018000100402
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1806-832420180001004022018-07-19Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysisLEÃO,Rafaella de SouzaMAIOR,Juliana Raposo SoutoLEMOS,Cleidiel Aparecido de AraújoVASCONCELOS,Belmiro Cavalcanti do EgitoMONTES,Marcos Antônio Japiassú ResendePELLIZZER,Eduardo PizaMORAES,Sandra Lúcia Dantas Acrylic Resins Prosthesis Implantation Skull Abstract Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has been considered a suitable material for cranioplasty. However, no consensus has been reached concerning the best material for cranioplasty with regard to minimizing complications. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the complication rates of PMMA with those of autologous bone and titanium mesh. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016042725). Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The focus question was, “Do PMMA prostheses used in cranioplasty have complications rates similar to those of autologous bone and titanium mesh?” A meta-analysis of complication rates was performed on the basis of dichotomous outcomes assessed by risk ratio (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). From 1014 data sources, 11 articles were selected according to eligibility criteria. These articles involved 1,256 individuals and 1,278 cranioplasties using autologous bone (n = 408), PMMA (n = 379), or titanium (n = 151). The follow-up period ranged from 63 days to 54.3 months. No difference was observed between the complication rates of PMMA and autologous bone (p = 0.94; RR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.54–1.75) or between PMMA and titanium (p = 0.38; RR, 1.59; 95%CI, 0.57–4.48). Sub-analysis of the reasons for craniotomy (trauma/non-trauma) was conducted, which revealed no significant difference (p = 0.91; RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.37–2.42). The meta-analysis indicated that the use of PMMA yields complication rates that are near those of autologous bone and titanium mesh.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqOBrazilian Oral Research v.32 20182018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100402en10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0031
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author LEÃO,Rafaella de Souza
MAIOR,Juliana Raposo Souto
LEMOS,Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo
VASCONCELOS,Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito
MONTES,Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende
PELLIZZER,Eduardo Piza
MORAES,Sandra Lúcia Dantas
spellingShingle LEÃO,Rafaella de Souza
MAIOR,Juliana Raposo Souto
LEMOS,Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo
VASCONCELOS,Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito
MONTES,Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende
PELLIZZER,Eduardo Piza
MORAES,Sandra Lúcia Dantas
Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
author_facet LEÃO,Rafaella de Souza
MAIOR,Juliana Raposo Souto
LEMOS,Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo
VASCONCELOS,Belmiro Cavalcanti do Egito
MONTES,Marcos Antônio Japiassú Resende
PELLIZZER,Eduardo Piza
MORAES,Sandra Lúcia Dantas
author_sort LEÃO,Rafaella de Souza
title Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Complications with PMMA compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort complications with pmma compared with other materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
description Abstract Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) has been considered a suitable material for cranioplasty. However, no consensus has been reached concerning the best material for cranioplasty with regard to minimizing complications. Thus, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the complication rates of PMMA with those of autologous bone and titanium mesh. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42016042725). Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. The focus question was, “Do PMMA prostheses used in cranioplasty have complications rates similar to those of autologous bone and titanium mesh?” A meta-analysis of complication rates was performed on the basis of dichotomous outcomes assessed by risk ratio (RR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). From 1014 data sources, 11 articles were selected according to eligibility criteria. These articles involved 1,256 individuals and 1,278 cranioplasties using autologous bone (n = 408), PMMA (n = 379), or titanium (n = 151). The follow-up period ranged from 63 days to 54.3 months. No difference was observed between the complication rates of PMMA and autologous bone (p = 0.94; RR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.54–1.75) or between PMMA and titanium (p = 0.38; RR, 1.59; 95%CI, 0.57–4.48). Sub-analysis of the reasons for craniotomy (trauma/non-trauma) was conducted, which revealed no significant difference (p = 0.91; RR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.37–2.42). The meta-analysis indicated that the use of PMMA yields complication rates that are near those of autologous bone and titanium mesh.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publishDate 2018
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242018000100402
work_keys_str_mv AT leaorafaelladesouza complicationswithpmmacomparedwithothermaterialsusedincranioplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maiorjulianarapososouto complicationswithpmmacomparedwithothermaterialsusedincranioplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lemoscleidielaparecidodearaujo complicationswithpmmacomparedwithothermaterialsusedincranioplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vasconcelosbelmirocavalcantidoegito complicationswithpmmacomparedwithothermaterialsusedincranioplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT montesmarcosantoniojapiassuresende complicationswithpmmacomparedwithothermaterialsusedincranioplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pellizzereduardopiza complicationswithpmmacomparedwithothermaterialsusedincranioplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT moraessandraluciadantas complicationswithpmmacomparedwithothermaterialsusedincranioplastyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1756431633456562176