The use of tools to support oral lesion description in oral medicine referrals
Abstract: Poor description of oral lesions jeopardize the prioritization of appointments in Oral Medicine. The present study investigated whether the use of support tools changes the quality of descriptions focusing on health care prioritization. Two oral lesions (A and B) were described by 64 dental students and 48 dentists using three methods: (a) without support tools (free); (b) using the oral examination form from the Specialties Manual in Oral Health/Brazilian Ministry of Health (SMOH form); and (c) using the OralDESC guideline. The descriptions were compared with a gold standard and percentage of agreement was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests (p<0.05). Descriptions with the OralDESC presented higher information quality. Considering items essential for prioritization, the OralDESC demonstrated better performance for lesion A; for lesion B, free descriptions and descriptions using the OralDESC were of higher quality than those using SMOH form. Therefore, the OralDESC offered greater support for the description of oral lesions for health care prioritization in Oral Medicine.
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
2017
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000100277 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S1806-83242017000100277 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S1806-832420170001002772017-11-22The use of tools to support oral lesion description in oral medicine referralsZimmermann,CarolineMeurer,Maria InêsLacerda,Josimari Telino deMello,Ana Lúcia Schaefer Ferreira deGrando,Liliane Janete Primary Health Care Secondary Care Guideline Oral Medicine Referral and Consultation Abstract: Poor description of oral lesions jeopardize the prioritization of appointments in Oral Medicine. The present study investigated whether the use of support tools changes the quality of descriptions focusing on health care prioritization. Two oral lesions (A and B) were described by 64 dental students and 48 dentists using three methods: (a) without support tools (free); (b) using the oral examination form from the Specialties Manual in Oral Health/Brazilian Ministry of Health (SMOH form); and (c) using the OralDESC guideline. The descriptions were compared with a gold standard and percentage of agreement was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests (p<0.05). Descriptions with the OralDESC presented higher information quality. Considering items essential for prioritization, the OralDESC demonstrated better performance for lesion A; for lesion B, free descriptions and descriptions using the OralDESC were of higher quality than those using SMOH form. Therefore, the OralDESC offered greater support for the description of oral lesions for health care prioritization in Oral Medicine.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqOBrazilian Oral Research v.31 20172017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000100277en10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0093 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Zimmermann,Caroline Meurer,Maria Inês Lacerda,Josimari Telino de Mello,Ana Lúcia Schaefer Ferreira de Grando,Liliane Janete |
spellingShingle |
Zimmermann,Caroline Meurer,Maria Inês Lacerda,Josimari Telino de Mello,Ana Lúcia Schaefer Ferreira de Grando,Liliane Janete The use of tools to support oral lesion description in oral medicine referrals |
author_facet |
Zimmermann,Caroline Meurer,Maria Inês Lacerda,Josimari Telino de Mello,Ana Lúcia Schaefer Ferreira de Grando,Liliane Janete |
author_sort |
Zimmermann,Caroline |
title |
The use of tools to support oral lesion description in oral medicine referrals |
title_short |
The use of tools to support oral lesion description in oral medicine referrals |
title_full |
The use of tools to support oral lesion description in oral medicine referrals |
title_fullStr |
The use of tools to support oral lesion description in oral medicine referrals |
title_full_unstemmed |
The use of tools to support oral lesion description in oral medicine referrals |
title_sort |
use of tools to support oral lesion description in oral medicine referrals |
description |
Abstract: Poor description of oral lesions jeopardize the prioritization of appointments in Oral Medicine. The present study investigated whether the use of support tools changes the quality of descriptions focusing on health care prioritization. Two oral lesions (A and B) were described by 64 dental students and 48 dentists using three methods: (a) without support tools (free); (b) using the oral examination form from the Specialties Manual in Oral Health/Brazilian Ministry of Health (SMOH form); and (c) using the OralDESC guideline. The descriptions were compared with a gold standard and percentage of agreement was analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests (p<0.05). Descriptions with the OralDESC presented higher information quality. Considering items essential for prioritization, the OralDESC demonstrated better performance for lesion A; for lesion B, free descriptions and descriptions using the OralDESC were of higher quality than those using SMOH form. Therefore, the OralDESC offered greater support for the description of oral lesions for health care prioritization in Oral Medicine. |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242017000100277 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zimmermanncaroline theuseoftoolstosupportorallesiondescriptioninoralmedicinereferrals AT meurermariaines theuseoftoolstosupportorallesiondescriptioninoralmedicinereferrals AT lacerdajosimaritelinode theuseoftoolstosupportorallesiondescriptioninoralmedicinereferrals AT melloanaluciaschaeferferreirade theuseoftoolstosupportorallesiondescriptioninoralmedicinereferrals AT grandolilianejanete theuseoftoolstosupportorallesiondescriptioninoralmedicinereferrals AT zimmermanncaroline useoftoolstosupportorallesiondescriptioninoralmedicinereferrals AT meurermariaines useoftoolstosupportorallesiondescriptioninoralmedicinereferrals AT lacerdajosimaritelinode useoftoolstosupportorallesiondescriptioninoralmedicinereferrals AT melloanaluciaschaeferferreirade useoftoolstosupportorallesiondescriptioninoralmedicinereferrals AT grandolilianejanete useoftoolstosupportorallesiondescriptioninoralmedicinereferrals |
_version_ |
1756431613092167680 |