Evaluation of condyle defects using different reconstruction protocols of cone-beam computed tomography

This study was conducted to investigate how well cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can detect simulated cavitary defects in condyles, and to test the influence of the reconstruction protocols. Defects were created with spherical diamond burs (numbers 1013, 1016, 3017) in superior and/or posterior surfaces of twenty condyles. The condyles were scanned, and cross-sectional reconstructions were performed with nine different protocols, based on slice thickness (0.2, 0.6, 1.0 mm) and on the filters (original image, Sharpen Mild, S9) used. Two observers evaluated the defects, determining their presence and location. Statistical analysis was carried out using simple Kappa coefficient and McNemar's test to check inter- and intra-rater reliability. The chi-square test was used to compare the rater accuracy. Analysis of variance (Tukey's test) assessed the effect of the protocols used. Kappa values for inter- and intra-rater reliability demonstrate almost perfect agreement. The proportion of correct answers was significantly higher than that of errors for cavitary defects on both condyle surfaces (p < 0.01). Only in identifying the defects located on the posterior surface was it possible to observe the influence of the 1.0 mm protocol thickness and no filter, which showed a significantly lower value. Based on the results of the current study, the technique used was valid for identifying the existence of cavities in the condyle surface. However, the protocol of a 1.0 mm-thick slice and no filter proved to be the worst method for identifying the defects on the posterior surface.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bastos,Luana Costa, Campos,Paulo Sergio Flores, Ramos-Perez,Flavia Maria de Moraes, Pontual,Andrea dos Anjos, Almeida,Solange Maria
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO 2013
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242013000600503
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1806-83242013000600503
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1806-832420130006005032014-01-09Evaluation of condyle defects using different reconstruction protocols of cone-beam computed tomographyBastos,Luana CostaCampos,Paulo Sergio FloresRamos-Perez,Flavia Maria de MoraesPontual,Andrea dos AnjosAlmeida,Solange Maria Mandibular Condyle Bone Diseases Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Image Enhancement This study was conducted to investigate how well cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can detect simulated cavitary defects in condyles, and to test the influence of the reconstruction protocols. Defects were created with spherical diamond burs (numbers 1013, 1016, 3017) in superior and/or posterior surfaces of twenty condyles. The condyles were scanned, and cross-sectional reconstructions were performed with nine different protocols, based on slice thickness (0.2, 0.6, 1.0 mm) and on the filters (original image, Sharpen Mild, S9) used. Two observers evaluated the defects, determining their presence and location. Statistical analysis was carried out using simple Kappa coefficient and McNemar's test to check inter- and intra-rater reliability. The chi-square test was used to compare the rater accuracy. Analysis of variance (Tukey's test) assessed the effect of the protocols used. Kappa values for inter- and intra-rater reliability demonstrate almost perfect agreement. The proportion of correct answers was significantly higher than that of errors for cavitary defects on both condyle surfaces (p < 0.01). Only in identifying the defects located on the posterior surface was it possible to observe the influence of the 1.0 mm protocol thickness and no filter, which showed a significantly lower value. Based on the results of the current study, the technique used was valid for identifying the existence of cavities in the condyle surface. However, the protocol of a 1.0 mm-thick slice and no filter proved to be the worst method for identifying the defects on the posterior surface.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqOBrazilian Oral Research v.27 n.6 20132013-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242013000600503en10.1590/S1806-83242013000600010
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Bastos,Luana Costa
Campos,Paulo Sergio Flores
Ramos-Perez,Flavia Maria de Moraes
Pontual,Andrea dos Anjos
Almeida,Solange Maria
spellingShingle Bastos,Luana Costa
Campos,Paulo Sergio Flores
Ramos-Perez,Flavia Maria de Moraes
Pontual,Andrea dos Anjos
Almeida,Solange Maria
Evaluation of condyle defects using different reconstruction protocols of cone-beam computed tomography
author_facet Bastos,Luana Costa
Campos,Paulo Sergio Flores
Ramos-Perez,Flavia Maria de Moraes
Pontual,Andrea dos Anjos
Almeida,Solange Maria
author_sort Bastos,Luana Costa
title Evaluation of condyle defects using different reconstruction protocols of cone-beam computed tomography
title_short Evaluation of condyle defects using different reconstruction protocols of cone-beam computed tomography
title_full Evaluation of condyle defects using different reconstruction protocols of cone-beam computed tomography
title_fullStr Evaluation of condyle defects using different reconstruction protocols of cone-beam computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of condyle defects using different reconstruction protocols of cone-beam computed tomography
title_sort evaluation of condyle defects using different reconstruction protocols of cone-beam computed tomography
description This study was conducted to investigate how well cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can detect simulated cavitary defects in condyles, and to test the influence of the reconstruction protocols. Defects were created with spherical diamond burs (numbers 1013, 1016, 3017) in superior and/or posterior surfaces of twenty condyles. The condyles were scanned, and cross-sectional reconstructions were performed with nine different protocols, based on slice thickness (0.2, 0.6, 1.0 mm) and on the filters (original image, Sharpen Mild, S9) used. Two observers evaluated the defects, determining their presence and location. Statistical analysis was carried out using simple Kappa coefficient and McNemar's test to check inter- and intra-rater reliability. The chi-square test was used to compare the rater accuracy. Analysis of variance (Tukey's test) assessed the effect of the protocols used. Kappa values for inter- and intra-rater reliability demonstrate almost perfect agreement. The proportion of correct answers was significantly higher than that of errors for cavitary defects on both condyle surfaces (p < 0.01). Only in identifying the defects located on the posterior surface was it possible to observe the influence of the 1.0 mm protocol thickness and no filter, which showed a significantly lower value. Based on the results of the current study, the technique used was valid for identifying the existence of cavities in the condyle surface. However, the protocol of a 1.0 mm-thick slice and no filter proved to be the worst method for identifying the defects on the posterior surface.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publishDate 2013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242013000600503
work_keys_str_mv AT bastosluanacosta evaluationofcondyledefectsusingdifferentreconstructionprotocolsofconebeamcomputedtomography
AT campospaulosergioflores evaluationofcondyledefectsusingdifferentreconstructionprotocolsofconebeamcomputedtomography
AT ramosperezflaviamariademoraes evaluationofcondyledefectsusingdifferentreconstructionprotocolsofconebeamcomputedtomography
AT pontualandreadosanjos evaluationofcondyledefectsusingdifferentreconstructionprotocolsofconebeamcomputedtomography
AT almeidasolangemaria evaluationofcondyledefectsusingdifferentreconstructionprotocolsofconebeamcomputedtomography
_version_ 1756431550444994560