Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery

There is little material in the literature that compares biological width measurements in periapical and bite-wings radiographs with clinical measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of biological width taken by three different methods which are frequently used for planning periodontal surgery - periapical radiograph, bite-wing radiograph and transperiodontal probing - with the trans-surgical measurements. Thirty-four sites from twenty-one subjects were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients between measurements obtained trans-surgically (gold standard) and those obtained by transperiodontal probing, periapical radiography and bite-wing radiography were determined. Average measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test at a significance level of 0.05. Also, the frequency distribution of differences between test measurements and the gold standard was calculated. The results showed that transperiodontal probing (mean 2.05 mm) was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard (mean 1.97 mm), with no statistically significant difference observed. On the other hand, periapical and bite-wing radiographic mean values (1.56 mm and 1.72 mm, respectively) were smaller than the gold standard, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). It was concluded that transperiodontal probing was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard, followed by that obtained with the bite-wing radiograph. The clinical relevance of these results could be that planning for crown lengthening surgery should, preferably, include transperiodontal probing.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin, Giacomelli,Bruno Rodrigues, Dotto,Patricia Pasquali, Fontanella,Vânia Regina Camargo, Rosing,Cassiano Kuchenbecker
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO 2010
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242010000400012
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1806-83242010000400012
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1806-832420100004000122010-12-16Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgeryZanatta,Fabricio BatistinGiacomelli,Bruno RodriguesDotto,Patricia PasqualiFontanella,Vânia Regina CamargoRosing,Cassiano Kuchenbecker Periodontics Planning Techniques Crown Lengthening Surgery/Oral Radiology There is little material in the literature that compares biological width measurements in periapical and bite-wings radiographs with clinical measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of biological width taken by three different methods which are frequently used for planning periodontal surgery - periapical radiograph, bite-wing radiograph and transperiodontal probing - with the trans-surgical measurements. Thirty-four sites from twenty-one subjects were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients between measurements obtained trans-surgically (gold standard) and those obtained by transperiodontal probing, periapical radiography and bite-wing radiography were determined. Average measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test at a significance level of 0.05. Also, the frequency distribution of differences between test measurements and the gold standard was calculated. The results showed that transperiodontal probing (mean 2.05 mm) was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard (mean 1.97 mm), with no statistically significant difference observed. On the other hand, periapical and bite-wing radiographic mean values (1.56 mm and 1.72 mm, respectively) were smaller than the gold standard, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). It was concluded that transperiodontal probing was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard, followed by that obtained with the bite-wing radiograph. The clinical relevance of these results could be that planning for crown lengthening surgery should, preferably, include transperiodontal probing.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqOBrazilian Oral Research v.24 n.4 20102010-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242010000400012en10.1590/S1806-83242010000400012
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin
Giacomelli,Bruno Rodrigues
Dotto,Patricia Pasquali
Fontanella,Vânia Regina Camargo
Rosing,Cassiano Kuchenbecker
spellingShingle Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin
Giacomelli,Bruno Rodrigues
Dotto,Patricia Pasquali
Fontanella,Vânia Regina Camargo
Rosing,Cassiano Kuchenbecker
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
author_facet Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin
Giacomelli,Bruno Rodrigues
Dotto,Patricia Pasquali
Fontanella,Vânia Regina Camargo
Rosing,Cassiano Kuchenbecker
author_sort Zanatta,Fabricio Batistin
title Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
title_short Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
title_full Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
title_sort comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
description There is little material in the literature that compares biological width measurements in periapical and bite-wings radiographs with clinical measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of biological width taken by three different methods which are frequently used for planning periodontal surgery - periapical radiograph, bite-wing radiograph and transperiodontal probing - with the trans-surgical measurements. Thirty-four sites from twenty-one subjects were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients between measurements obtained trans-surgically (gold standard) and those obtained by transperiodontal probing, periapical radiography and bite-wing radiography were determined. Average measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test at a significance level of 0.05. Also, the frequency distribution of differences between test measurements and the gold standard was calculated. The results showed that transperiodontal probing (mean 2.05 mm) was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard (mean 1.97 mm), with no statistically significant difference observed. On the other hand, periapical and bite-wing radiographic mean values (1.56 mm and 1.72 mm, respectively) were smaller than the gold standard, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). It was concluded that transperiodontal probing was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard, followed by that obtained with the bite-wing radiograph. The clinical relevance of these results could be that planning for crown lengthening surgery should, preferably, include transperiodontal probing.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publishDate 2010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242010000400012
work_keys_str_mv AT zanattafabriciobatistin comparisonofdifferentmethodsinvolvedintheplanningofclinicalcrownlengtheningsurgery
AT giacomellibrunorodrigues comparisonofdifferentmethodsinvolvedintheplanningofclinicalcrownlengtheningsurgery
AT dottopatriciapasquali comparisonofdifferentmethodsinvolvedintheplanningofclinicalcrownlengtheningsurgery
AT fontanellavaniareginacamargo comparisonofdifferentmethodsinvolvedintheplanningofclinicalcrownlengtheningsurgery
AT rosingcassianokuchenbecker comparisonofdifferentmethodsinvolvedintheplanningofclinicalcrownlengtheningsurgery
_version_ 1756431504156655616