Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models
The aim of this study was to determine the reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements in digital models compared to plaster models. Fifteen pairs of plaster models were obtained from orthodontic patients with permanent dentition before treatment. These were digitized to be evaluated with the program Cécile3 v2.554.2 beta. Two examiners measured three times the mesiodistal width of all the teeth present, intercanine, interpremolar and intermolar distances, overjet and overbite. The plaster models were measured using a digital vernier. The t-Student test for paired samples and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used for statistical analysis. The ICC of the digital models were 0.84 ± 0.15 (intra-examiner) and 0.80 ± 0.19 (inter-examiner). The average mean difference of the digital models was 0.23 ± 0.14 and 0.24 ± 0.11 for each examiner, respectively. When the two types of measurements were compared, the values obtained from the digital models were lower than those obtained from the plaster models (p < 0.05), although the differences were considered clinically insignificant (differences < 0.1 mm). The Cécile digital models are a clinically acceptable alternative for use in Orthodontics.
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
2009
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242009000300011 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S1806-83242009000300011 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S1806-832420090003000112009-11-04Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital modelsWatanabe-Kanno,Gustavo AdolfoAbrão,JorgeMiasiro Junior,HiroshiSánchez-Ayala,AlfonsoLagravère,Manuel O. Dental models Reproducibility of results Orthodontics The aim of this study was to determine the reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements in digital models compared to plaster models. Fifteen pairs of plaster models were obtained from orthodontic patients with permanent dentition before treatment. These were digitized to be evaluated with the program Cécile3 v2.554.2 beta. Two examiners measured three times the mesiodistal width of all the teeth present, intercanine, interpremolar and intermolar distances, overjet and overbite. The plaster models were measured using a digital vernier. The t-Student test for paired samples and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used for statistical analysis. The ICC of the digital models were 0.84 ± 0.15 (intra-examiner) and 0.80 ± 0.19 (inter-examiner). The average mean difference of the digital models was 0.23 ± 0.14 and 0.24 ± 0.11 for each examiner, respectively. When the two types of measurements were compared, the values obtained from the digital models were lower than those obtained from the plaster models (p < 0.05), although the differences were considered clinically insignificant (differences < 0.1 mm). The Cécile digital models are a clinically acceptable alternative for use in Orthodontics.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqOBrazilian Oral Research v.23 n.3 20092009-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242009000300011en10.1590/S1806-83242009000300011 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Watanabe-Kanno,Gustavo Adolfo Abrão,Jorge Miasiro Junior,Hiroshi Sánchez-Ayala,Alfonso Lagravère,Manuel O. |
spellingShingle |
Watanabe-Kanno,Gustavo Adolfo Abrão,Jorge Miasiro Junior,Hiroshi Sánchez-Ayala,Alfonso Lagravère,Manuel O. Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models |
author_facet |
Watanabe-Kanno,Gustavo Adolfo Abrão,Jorge Miasiro Junior,Hiroshi Sánchez-Ayala,Alfonso Lagravère,Manuel O. |
author_sort |
Watanabe-Kanno,Gustavo Adolfo |
title |
Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models |
title_short |
Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models |
title_full |
Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models |
title_fullStr |
Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models |
title_sort |
reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from cecile3 digital models |
description |
The aim of this study was to determine the reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements in digital models compared to plaster models. Fifteen pairs of plaster models were obtained from orthodontic patients with permanent dentition before treatment. These were digitized to be evaluated with the program Cécile3 v2.554.2 beta. Two examiners measured three times the mesiodistal width of all the teeth present, intercanine, interpremolar and intermolar distances, overjet and overbite. The plaster models were measured using a digital vernier. The t-Student test for paired samples and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used for statistical analysis. The ICC of the digital models were 0.84 ± 0.15 (intra-examiner) and 0.80 ± 0.19 (inter-examiner). The average mean difference of the digital models was 0.23 ± 0.14 and 0.24 ± 0.11 for each examiner, respectively. When the two types of measurements were compared, the values obtained from the digital models were lower than those obtained from the plaster models (p < 0.05), although the differences were considered clinically insignificant (differences < 0.1 mm). The Cécile digital models are a clinically acceptable alternative for use in Orthodontics. |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO |
publishDate |
2009 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242009000300011 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT watanabekannogustavoadolfo reproducibilityreliabilityandvalidityofmeasurementsobtainedfromcecile3digitalmodels AT abraojorge reproducibilityreliabilityandvalidityofmeasurementsobtainedfromcecile3digitalmodels AT miasirojuniorhiroshi reproducibilityreliabilityandvalidityofmeasurementsobtainedfromcecile3digitalmodels AT sanchezayalaalfonso reproducibilityreliabilityandvalidityofmeasurementsobtainedfromcecile3digitalmodels AT lagraveremanuelo reproducibilityreliabilityandvalidityofmeasurementsobtainedfromcecile3digitalmodels |
_version_ |
1756431489117978624 |