Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models

The aim of this study was to determine the reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements in digital models compared to plaster models. Fifteen pairs of plaster models were obtained from orthodontic patients with permanent dentition before treatment. These were digitized to be evaluated with the program Cécile3 v2.554.2 beta. Two examiners measured three times the mesiodistal width of all the teeth present, intercanine, interpremolar and intermolar distances, overjet and overbite. The plaster models were measured using a digital vernier. The t-Student test for paired samples and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used for statistical analysis. The ICC of the digital models were 0.84 ± 0.15 (intra-examiner) and 0.80 ± 0.19 (inter-examiner). The average mean difference of the digital models was 0.23 ± 0.14 and 0.24 ± 0.11 for each examiner, respectively. When the two types of measurements were compared, the values obtained from the digital models were lower than those obtained from the plaster models (p < 0.05), although the differences were considered clinically insignificant (differences < 0.1 mm). The Cécile digital models are a clinically acceptable alternative for use in Orthodontics.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Watanabe-Kanno,Gustavo Adolfo, Abrão,Jorge, Miasiro Junior,Hiroshi, Sánchez-Ayala,Alfonso, Lagravère,Manuel O.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO 2009
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242009000300011
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1806-83242009000300011
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1806-832420090003000112009-11-04Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital modelsWatanabe-Kanno,Gustavo AdolfoAbrão,JorgeMiasiro Junior,HiroshiSánchez-Ayala,AlfonsoLagravère,Manuel O. Dental models Reproducibility of results Orthodontics The aim of this study was to determine the reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements in digital models compared to plaster models. Fifteen pairs of plaster models were obtained from orthodontic patients with permanent dentition before treatment. These were digitized to be evaluated with the program Cécile3 v2.554.2 beta. Two examiners measured three times the mesiodistal width of all the teeth present, intercanine, interpremolar and intermolar distances, overjet and overbite. The plaster models were measured using a digital vernier. The t-Student test for paired samples and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used for statistical analysis. The ICC of the digital models were 0.84 ± 0.15 (intra-examiner) and 0.80 ± 0.19 (inter-examiner). The average mean difference of the digital models was 0.23 ± 0.14 and 0.24 ± 0.11 for each examiner, respectively. When the two types of measurements were compared, the values obtained from the digital models were lower than those obtained from the plaster models (p < 0.05), although the differences were considered clinically insignificant (differences < 0.1 mm). The Cécile digital models are a clinically acceptable alternative for use in Orthodontics.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqOBrazilian Oral Research v.23 n.3 20092009-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242009000300011en10.1590/S1806-83242009000300011
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Watanabe-Kanno,Gustavo Adolfo
Abrão,Jorge
Miasiro Junior,Hiroshi
Sánchez-Ayala,Alfonso
Lagravère,Manuel O.
spellingShingle Watanabe-Kanno,Gustavo Adolfo
Abrão,Jorge
Miasiro Junior,Hiroshi
Sánchez-Ayala,Alfonso
Lagravère,Manuel O.
Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models
author_facet Watanabe-Kanno,Gustavo Adolfo
Abrão,Jorge
Miasiro Junior,Hiroshi
Sánchez-Ayala,Alfonso
Lagravère,Manuel O.
author_sort Watanabe-Kanno,Gustavo Adolfo
title Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models
title_short Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models
title_full Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models
title_fullStr Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from Cecile3 digital models
title_sort reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements obtained from cecile3 digital models
description The aim of this study was to determine the reproducibility, reliability and validity of measurements in digital models compared to plaster models. Fifteen pairs of plaster models were obtained from orthodontic patients with permanent dentition before treatment. These were digitized to be evaluated with the program Cécile3 v2.554.2 beta. Two examiners measured three times the mesiodistal width of all the teeth present, intercanine, interpremolar and intermolar distances, overjet and overbite. The plaster models were measured using a digital vernier. The t-Student test for paired samples and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used for statistical analysis. The ICC of the digital models were 0.84 ± 0.15 (intra-examiner) and 0.80 ± 0.19 (inter-examiner). The average mean difference of the digital models was 0.23 ± 0.14 and 0.24 ± 0.11 for each examiner, respectively. When the two types of measurements were compared, the values obtained from the digital models were lower than those obtained from the plaster models (p < 0.05), although the differences were considered clinically insignificant (differences < 0.1 mm). The Cécile digital models are a clinically acceptable alternative for use in Orthodontics.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO
publishDate 2009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-83242009000300011
work_keys_str_mv AT watanabekannogustavoadolfo reproducibilityreliabilityandvalidityofmeasurementsobtainedfromcecile3digitalmodels
AT abraojorge reproducibilityreliabilityandvalidityofmeasurementsobtainedfromcecile3digitalmodels
AT miasirojuniorhiroshi reproducibilityreliabilityandvalidityofmeasurementsobtainedfromcecile3digitalmodels
AT sanchezayalaalfonso reproducibilityreliabilityandvalidityofmeasurementsobtainedfromcecile3digitalmodels
AT lagraveremanuelo reproducibilityreliabilityandvalidityofmeasurementsobtainedfromcecile3digitalmodels
_version_ 1756431489117978624