A benchmark study on intelligent sampling techniques in Monte Carlo simulation

In recent years, new, intelligent and efficient sampling techniques for Monte Carlo simulation have been developed. However, when such new techniques are introduced, they are compared to one or two existing techniques, and their performance is evaluated over two or three problems. A literature survey shows that benchmark studies, comparing the performance of several techniques over several problems, are rarely found. This article presents a benchmark study, comparing Simple or Crude Monte Carlo with four modern sampling techniques: Importance Sampling Monte Carlo, Asymptotic Sampling, Enhanced Sampling and Subset Simulation; which are studied over six problems. Moreover, these techniques are combined with three schemes for generating the underlying samples: Simple Sampling, Latin Hypercube Sampling and Antithetic Variates Sampling. Hence, a total of fifteen sampling strategy combinations are explored herein. Due to space constrains, results are presented for only three of the six problems studied; conclusions, however, cover all problems studied. Results show that Importance Sampling using design points is extremely efficient for evaluating small failure probabilities; however, finding the design point can be an issue for some problems. Subset Simulation presented very good performance for all problems studied herein. Although similar, Enhanced Sampling performed better than Asymptotic Sampling for the problems considered: this is explained by the fact that in Enhanced Sampling the same set of samples is used for all support points; hence a larger number of support points can be employed without increasing the computational cost. Finally, the performance of all the above techniques was improved when combined with Latin Hypercube Sampling, in comparison to Simple or Antithetic Variates sampling.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Santos,K.R.M. dos, Beck,A.T.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Ciências Mecânicas 2015
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252015000400624
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1679-78252015000400624
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1679-782520150004006242015-09-24A benchmark study on intelligent sampling techniques in Monte Carlo simulationSantos,K.R.M. dosBeck,A.T. Structural reliability Monte Carlo simulation intelligent sampling techniques benchmark study In recent years, new, intelligent and efficient sampling techniques for Monte Carlo simulation have been developed. However, when such new techniques are introduced, they are compared to one or two existing techniques, and their performance is evaluated over two or three problems. A literature survey shows that benchmark studies, comparing the performance of several techniques over several problems, are rarely found. This article presents a benchmark study, comparing Simple or Crude Monte Carlo with four modern sampling techniques: Importance Sampling Monte Carlo, Asymptotic Sampling, Enhanced Sampling and Subset Simulation; which are studied over six problems. Moreover, these techniques are combined with three schemes for generating the underlying samples: Simple Sampling, Latin Hypercube Sampling and Antithetic Variates Sampling. Hence, a total of fifteen sampling strategy combinations are explored herein. Due to space constrains, results are presented for only three of the six problems studied; conclusions, however, cover all problems studied. Results show that Importance Sampling using design points is extremely efficient for evaluating small failure probabilities; however, finding the design point can be an issue for some problems. Subset Simulation presented very good performance for all problems studied herein. Although similar, Enhanced Sampling performed better than Asymptotic Sampling for the problems considered: this is explained by the fact that in Enhanced Sampling the same set of samples is used for all support points; hence a larger number of support points can be employed without increasing the computational cost. Finally, the performance of all the above techniques was improved when combined with Latin Hypercube Sampling, in comparison to Simple or Antithetic Variates sampling.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAssociação Brasileira de Ciências MecânicasLatin American Journal of Solids and Structures v.12 n.4 20152015-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252015000400624en10.1590/1679-78251245
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Santos,K.R.M. dos
Beck,A.T.
spellingShingle Santos,K.R.M. dos
Beck,A.T.
A benchmark study on intelligent sampling techniques in Monte Carlo simulation
author_facet Santos,K.R.M. dos
Beck,A.T.
author_sort Santos,K.R.M. dos
title A benchmark study on intelligent sampling techniques in Monte Carlo simulation
title_short A benchmark study on intelligent sampling techniques in Monte Carlo simulation
title_full A benchmark study on intelligent sampling techniques in Monte Carlo simulation
title_fullStr A benchmark study on intelligent sampling techniques in Monte Carlo simulation
title_full_unstemmed A benchmark study on intelligent sampling techniques in Monte Carlo simulation
title_sort benchmark study on intelligent sampling techniques in monte carlo simulation
description In recent years, new, intelligent and efficient sampling techniques for Monte Carlo simulation have been developed. However, when such new techniques are introduced, they are compared to one or two existing techniques, and their performance is evaluated over two or three problems. A literature survey shows that benchmark studies, comparing the performance of several techniques over several problems, are rarely found. This article presents a benchmark study, comparing Simple or Crude Monte Carlo with four modern sampling techniques: Importance Sampling Monte Carlo, Asymptotic Sampling, Enhanced Sampling and Subset Simulation; which are studied over six problems. Moreover, these techniques are combined with three schemes for generating the underlying samples: Simple Sampling, Latin Hypercube Sampling and Antithetic Variates Sampling. Hence, a total of fifteen sampling strategy combinations are explored herein. Due to space constrains, results are presented for only three of the six problems studied; conclusions, however, cover all problems studied. Results show that Importance Sampling using design points is extremely efficient for evaluating small failure probabilities; however, finding the design point can be an issue for some problems. Subset Simulation presented very good performance for all problems studied herein. Although similar, Enhanced Sampling performed better than Asymptotic Sampling for the problems considered: this is explained by the fact that in Enhanced Sampling the same set of samples is used for all support points; hence a larger number of support points can be employed without increasing the computational cost. Finally, the performance of all the above techniques was improved when combined with Latin Hypercube Sampling, in comparison to Simple or Antithetic Variates sampling.
publisher Associação Brasileira de Ciências Mecânicas
publishDate 2015
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-78252015000400624
work_keys_str_mv AT santoskrmdos abenchmarkstudyonintelligentsamplingtechniquesinmontecarlosimulation
AT beckat abenchmarkstudyonintelligentsamplingtechniquesinmontecarlosimulation
AT santoskrmdos benchmarkstudyonintelligentsamplingtechniquesinmontecarlosimulation
AT beckat benchmarkstudyonintelligentsamplingtechniquesinmontecarlosimulation
_version_ 1756430270863507456