Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults

ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the discriminative power of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. Methods: A cross sectional study involving one hundred participants aged ≥60 years. The original and adapted versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and the Mini Nutritional Assessment were used. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 adaptation consisted of a lower age cutoff (60 years or older) for addition of one extra point to the final score. Results: Screening using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed higher nutritional risk among patients aged ≥70 years (p=0.009), whereas screening using the adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed similar nutritional risk in both age groups (60-69 years and ≥70 years; p=0.117). Frequency of nutritional risk was highest when the Mini Nutritional Assessment was administered (52.7%), followed by the adapted and original versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (35.5% and 29.1%, respectively). Conclusion: The adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 was more effective than the original version. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sugaya,Midori Cabral, Maio,Regiane, Soares,Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça, Calado,Cinthia Katiane Martins, Morais,Glaucia Queiroz, Arruda,Ilma Kruze Grande de, Burgos,Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein 2020
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100273
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1679-45082020000100273
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1679-450820200001002732021-11-29Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adultsSugaya,Midori CabralMaio,RegianeSoares,Bruna Lúcia de MendonçaCalado,Cinthia Katiane MartinsMorais,Glaucia QueirozArruda,Ilma Kruze Grande deBurgos,Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo Aged Nutritional status Malnutrition Nutritional assessment Nutrition therapy ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the discriminative power of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. Methods: A cross sectional study involving one hundred participants aged ≥60 years. The original and adapted versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and the Mini Nutritional Assessment were used. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 adaptation consisted of a lower age cutoff (60 years or older) for addition of one extra point to the final score. Results: Screening using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed higher nutritional risk among patients aged ≥70 years (p=0.009), whereas screening using the adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed similar nutritional risk in both age groups (60-69 years and ≥70 years; p=0.117). Frequency of nutritional risk was highest when the Mini Nutritional Assessment was administered (52.7%), followed by the adapted and original versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (35.5% and 29.1%, respectively). Conclusion: The adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 was more effective than the original version. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einsteineinstein (São Paulo) v.18 20202020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100273en10.31744/einstein_journal/2020ao5309
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Sugaya,Midori Cabral
Maio,Regiane
Soares,Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça
Calado,Cinthia Katiane Martins
Morais,Glaucia Queiroz
Arruda,Ilma Kruze Grande de
Burgos,Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo
spellingShingle Sugaya,Midori Cabral
Maio,Regiane
Soares,Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça
Calado,Cinthia Katiane Martins
Morais,Glaucia Queiroz
Arruda,Ilma Kruze Grande de
Burgos,Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo
Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults
author_facet Sugaya,Midori Cabral
Maio,Regiane
Soares,Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça
Calado,Cinthia Katiane Martins
Morais,Glaucia Queiroz
Arruda,Ilma Kruze Grande de
Burgos,Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo
author_sort Sugaya,Midori Cabral
title Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults
title_short Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults
title_full Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults
title_fullStr Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults
title_full_unstemmed Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults
title_sort discriminative power of an adapted version of nutritional risk screening 2002 applied to brazilian older adults
description ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the discriminative power of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. Methods: A cross sectional study involving one hundred participants aged ≥60 years. The original and adapted versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and the Mini Nutritional Assessment were used. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 adaptation consisted of a lower age cutoff (60 years or older) for addition of one extra point to the final score. Results: Screening using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed higher nutritional risk among patients aged ≥70 years (p=0.009), whereas screening using the adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed similar nutritional risk in both age groups (60-69 years and ≥70 years; p=0.117). Frequency of nutritional risk was highest when the Mini Nutritional Assessment was administered (52.7%), followed by the adapted and original versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (35.5% and 29.1%, respectively). Conclusion: The adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 was more effective than the original version. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
publisher Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
publishDate 2020
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100273
work_keys_str_mv AT sugayamidoricabral discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults
AT maioregiane discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults
AT soaresbrunaluciademendonca discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults
AT caladocinthiakatianemartins discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults
AT moraisglauciaqueiroz discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults
AT arrudailmakruzegrandede discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults
AT burgosmariagorettipessoadearaujo discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults
_version_ 1756429978389446656