Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults
ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the discriminative power of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. Methods: A cross sectional study involving one hundred participants aged ≥60 years. The original and adapted versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and the Mini Nutritional Assessment were used. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 adaptation consisted of a lower age cutoff (60 years or older) for addition of one extra point to the final score. Results: Screening using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed higher nutritional risk among patients aged ≥70 years (p=0.009), whereas screening using the adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed similar nutritional risk in both age groups (60-69 years and ≥70 years; p=0.117). Frequency of nutritional risk was highest when the Mini Nutritional Assessment was administered (52.7%), followed by the adapted and original versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (35.5% and 29.1%, respectively). Conclusion: The adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 was more effective than the original version. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Digital revista |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein
2020
|
Online Access: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100273 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
oai:scielo:S1679-45082020000100273 |
---|---|
record_format |
ojs |
spelling |
oai:scielo:S1679-450820200001002732021-11-29Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adultsSugaya,Midori CabralMaio,RegianeSoares,Bruna Lúcia de MendonçaCalado,Cinthia Katiane MartinsMorais,Glaucia QueirozArruda,Ilma Kruze Grande deBurgos,Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo Aged Nutritional status Malnutrition Nutritional assessment Nutrition therapy ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the discriminative power of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. Methods: A cross sectional study involving one hundred participants aged ≥60 years. The original and adapted versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and the Mini Nutritional Assessment were used. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 adaptation consisted of a lower age cutoff (60 years or older) for addition of one extra point to the final score. Results: Screening using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed higher nutritional risk among patients aged ≥70 years (p=0.009), whereas screening using the adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed similar nutritional risk in both age groups (60-69 years and ≥70 years; p=0.117). Frequency of nutritional risk was highest when the Mini Nutritional Assessment was administered (52.7%), followed by the adapted and original versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (35.5% and 29.1%, respectively). Conclusion: The adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 was more effective than the original version. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessInstituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einsteineinstein (São Paulo) v.18 20202020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100273en10.31744/einstein_journal/2020ao5309 |
institution |
SCIELO |
collection |
OJS |
country |
Brasil |
countrycode |
BR |
component |
Revista |
access |
En linea |
databasecode |
rev-scielo-br |
tag |
revista |
region |
America del Sur |
libraryname |
SciELO |
language |
English |
format |
Digital |
author |
Sugaya,Midori Cabral Maio,Regiane Soares,Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça Calado,Cinthia Katiane Martins Morais,Glaucia Queiroz Arruda,Ilma Kruze Grande de Burgos,Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo |
spellingShingle |
Sugaya,Midori Cabral Maio,Regiane Soares,Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça Calado,Cinthia Katiane Martins Morais,Glaucia Queiroz Arruda,Ilma Kruze Grande de Burgos,Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults |
author_facet |
Sugaya,Midori Cabral Maio,Regiane Soares,Bruna Lúcia de Mendonça Calado,Cinthia Katiane Martins Morais,Glaucia Queiroz Arruda,Ilma Kruze Grande de Burgos,Maria Goretti Pessoa de Araújo |
author_sort |
Sugaya,Midori Cabral |
title |
Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults |
title_short |
Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults |
title_full |
Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults |
title_fullStr |
Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults |
title_full_unstemmed |
Discriminative power of an adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 applied to Brazilian older adults |
title_sort |
discriminative power of an adapted version of nutritional risk screening 2002 applied to brazilian older adults |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To investigate the discriminative power of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002. Methods: A cross sectional study involving one hundred participants aged ≥60 years. The original and adapted versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 and the Mini Nutritional Assessment were used. Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 adaptation consisted of a lower age cutoff (60 years or older) for addition of one extra point to the final score. Results: Screening using Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed higher nutritional risk among patients aged ≥70 years (p=0.009), whereas screening using the adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 revealed similar nutritional risk in both age groups (60-69 years and ≥70 years; p=0.117). Frequency of nutritional risk was highest when the Mini Nutritional Assessment was administered (52.7%), followed by the adapted and original versions of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (35.5% and 29.1%, respectively). Conclusion: The adapted version of Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 was more effective than the original version. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings. |
publisher |
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein |
publishDate |
2020 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-45082020000100273 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT sugayamidoricabral discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults AT maioregiane discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults AT soaresbrunaluciademendonca discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults AT caladocinthiakatianemartins discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults AT moraisglauciaqueiroz discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults AT arrudailmakruzegrandede discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults AT burgosmariagorettipessoadearaujo discriminativepowerofanadaptedversionofnutritionalriskscreening2002appliedtobrazilianolderadults |
_version_ |
1756429978389446656 |