Residual stress estimated by nanoindentation in pontics and abutments of veneered zirconia fixed dental prostheses

Abstract Glass ceramics’ fractures in zirconia fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) remains a clinical challenge since it has higher fracture rates than the gold standard, metal ceramic FDP. Nanoindentation has been shown a reliable tool to determine residual stress of ceramic systems, which can ultimately correlate to failure-proneness. Objectives: To assess residual tensile stress using nanoindentation in veneered three-unit zirconia FDPs at different surfaces of pontics and abutments. Methodology: Three composite resin replicas of the maxillary first premolar and crown-prepared abutment first molar were made to obtain three-unit FDPs. The FDPs were veneered with glass ceramic containing fluorapatite crystals and resin cemented on the replicas, embedded in epoxy resin, sectioned, and polished. Each specimen was subjected to nanoindentation in the following regions of interest: 1) Mesial premolar abutment (MPMa); 2) Distal premolar abutment (DPMa); 3) Buccal premolar abutment (BPMa); 4) Lingual premolar abutment (LPMa); 5) Mesial premolar pontic (MPMp); 6) Distal premolar pontic (DPMp); 7) Buccal premolar pontic (BPMp); 8) Lingual premolar pontic (LPMp); 9) Mesial molar abutment (MMa); 10) Distal molar abutment (DMa); 11) Buccal molar abutment (BMa); and 12) Lingual molar abutment (LMa). Data were assessed using Linear Mixed Model and Least Significant Difference (95%) tests. Results: Pontics had significantly higher hardness values than premolar (p=0.001) and molar (p=0.007) abutments, suggesting lower residual stress levels. Marginal ridges yielded higher hardness values for connectors (DPMa, MMa, MPMp and DPMp) than for outer proximal surfaces of abutments (MPMa and DMa). The mesial marginal ridge of the premolar abutment (MPMa) had the lowest hardness values, suggesting higher residual stress concentration. Conclusions: Residual stress in three-unit FDPs was lower in pontics than in abutments. The outer proximal surfaces of the abutments had the highest residual stress concentration.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fardin,Vinicius Pavesi, Bonfante,Gerson, Coelho,Paulo G., Bergamo,Edmara T. P., Bordin,Dimorvan, Janal,Malvin N., Tovar,Nick, Witek,Lukasz, Bonfante,Estevam A.
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2022
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572022000100420
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1678-77572022000100420
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1678-775720220001004202022-04-18Residual stress estimated by nanoindentation in pontics and abutments of veneered zirconia fixed dental prosthesesFardin,Vinicius PavesiBonfante,GersonCoelho,Paulo G.Bergamo,Edmara T. P.Bordin,DimorvanJanal,Malvin N.Tovar,NickWitek,LukaszBonfante,Estevam A. Fatigue Ceramics Fixed Partial Denture Abstract Glass ceramics’ fractures in zirconia fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) remains a clinical challenge since it has higher fracture rates than the gold standard, metal ceramic FDP. Nanoindentation has been shown a reliable tool to determine residual stress of ceramic systems, which can ultimately correlate to failure-proneness. Objectives: To assess residual tensile stress using nanoindentation in veneered three-unit zirconia FDPs at different surfaces of pontics and abutments. Methodology: Three composite resin replicas of the maxillary first premolar and crown-prepared abutment first molar were made to obtain three-unit FDPs. The FDPs were veneered with glass ceramic containing fluorapatite crystals and resin cemented on the replicas, embedded in epoxy resin, sectioned, and polished. Each specimen was subjected to nanoindentation in the following regions of interest: 1) Mesial premolar abutment (MPMa); 2) Distal premolar abutment (DPMa); 3) Buccal premolar abutment (BPMa); 4) Lingual premolar abutment (LPMa); 5) Mesial premolar pontic (MPMp); 6) Distal premolar pontic (DPMp); 7) Buccal premolar pontic (BPMp); 8) Lingual premolar pontic (LPMp); 9) Mesial molar abutment (MMa); 10) Distal molar abutment (DMa); 11) Buccal molar abutment (BMa); and 12) Lingual molar abutment (LMa). Data were assessed using Linear Mixed Model and Least Significant Difference (95%) tests. Results: Pontics had significantly higher hardness values than premolar (p=0.001) and molar (p=0.007) abutments, suggesting lower residual stress levels. Marginal ridges yielded higher hardness values for connectors (DPMa, MMa, MPMp and DPMp) than for outer proximal surfaces of abutments (MPMa and DMa). The mesial marginal ridge of the premolar abutment (MPMa) had the lowest hardness values, suggesting higher residual stress concentration. Conclusions: Residual stress in three-unit FDPs was lower in pontics than in abutments. The outer proximal surfaces of the abutments had the highest residual stress concentration.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USPJournal of Applied Oral Science v.30 20222022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572022000100420en10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0475
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Fardin,Vinicius Pavesi
Bonfante,Gerson
Coelho,Paulo G.
Bergamo,Edmara T. P.
Bordin,Dimorvan
Janal,Malvin N.
Tovar,Nick
Witek,Lukasz
Bonfante,Estevam A.
spellingShingle Fardin,Vinicius Pavesi
Bonfante,Gerson
Coelho,Paulo G.
Bergamo,Edmara T. P.
Bordin,Dimorvan
Janal,Malvin N.
Tovar,Nick
Witek,Lukasz
Bonfante,Estevam A.
Residual stress estimated by nanoindentation in pontics and abutments of veneered zirconia fixed dental prostheses
author_facet Fardin,Vinicius Pavesi
Bonfante,Gerson
Coelho,Paulo G.
Bergamo,Edmara T. P.
Bordin,Dimorvan
Janal,Malvin N.
Tovar,Nick
Witek,Lukasz
Bonfante,Estevam A.
author_sort Fardin,Vinicius Pavesi
title Residual stress estimated by nanoindentation in pontics and abutments of veneered zirconia fixed dental prostheses
title_short Residual stress estimated by nanoindentation in pontics and abutments of veneered zirconia fixed dental prostheses
title_full Residual stress estimated by nanoindentation in pontics and abutments of veneered zirconia fixed dental prostheses
title_fullStr Residual stress estimated by nanoindentation in pontics and abutments of veneered zirconia fixed dental prostheses
title_full_unstemmed Residual stress estimated by nanoindentation in pontics and abutments of veneered zirconia fixed dental prostheses
title_sort residual stress estimated by nanoindentation in pontics and abutments of veneered zirconia fixed dental prostheses
description Abstract Glass ceramics’ fractures in zirconia fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) remains a clinical challenge since it has higher fracture rates than the gold standard, metal ceramic FDP. Nanoindentation has been shown a reliable tool to determine residual stress of ceramic systems, which can ultimately correlate to failure-proneness. Objectives: To assess residual tensile stress using nanoindentation in veneered three-unit zirconia FDPs at different surfaces of pontics and abutments. Methodology: Three composite resin replicas of the maxillary first premolar and crown-prepared abutment first molar were made to obtain three-unit FDPs. The FDPs were veneered with glass ceramic containing fluorapatite crystals and resin cemented on the replicas, embedded in epoxy resin, sectioned, and polished. Each specimen was subjected to nanoindentation in the following regions of interest: 1) Mesial premolar abutment (MPMa); 2) Distal premolar abutment (DPMa); 3) Buccal premolar abutment (BPMa); 4) Lingual premolar abutment (LPMa); 5) Mesial premolar pontic (MPMp); 6) Distal premolar pontic (DPMp); 7) Buccal premolar pontic (BPMp); 8) Lingual premolar pontic (LPMp); 9) Mesial molar abutment (MMa); 10) Distal molar abutment (DMa); 11) Buccal molar abutment (BMa); and 12) Lingual molar abutment (LMa). Data were assessed using Linear Mixed Model and Least Significant Difference (95%) tests. Results: Pontics had significantly higher hardness values than premolar (p=0.001) and molar (p=0.007) abutments, suggesting lower residual stress levels. Marginal ridges yielded higher hardness values for connectors (DPMa, MMa, MPMp and DPMp) than for outer proximal surfaces of abutments (MPMa and DMa). The mesial marginal ridge of the premolar abutment (MPMa) had the lowest hardness values, suggesting higher residual stress concentration. Conclusions: Residual stress in three-unit FDPs was lower in pontics than in abutments. The outer proximal surfaces of the abutments had the highest residual stress concentration.
publisher Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publishDate 2022
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572022000100420
work_keys_str_mv AT fardinviniciuspavesi residualstressestimatedbynanoindentationinponticsandabutmentsofveneeredzirconiafixeddentalprostheses
AT bonfantegerson residualstressestimatedbynanoindentationinponticsandabutmentsofveneeredzirconiafixeddentalprostheses
AT coelhopaulog residualstressestimatedbynanoindentationinponticsandabutmentsofveneeredzirconiafixeddentalprostheses
AT bergamoedmaratp residualstressestimatedbynanoindentationinponticsandabutmentsofveneeredzirconiafixeddentalprostheses
AT bordindimorvan residualstressestimatedbynanoindentationinponticsandabutmentsofveneeredzirconiafixeddentalprostheses
AT janalmalvinn residualstressestimatedbynanoindentationinponticsandabutmentsofveneeredzirconiafixeddentalprostheses
AT tovarnick residualstressestimatedbynanoindentationinponticsandabutmentsofveneeredzirconiafixeddentalprostheses
AT witeklukasz residualstressestimatedbynanoindentationinponticsandabutmentsofveneeredzirconiafixeddentalprostheses
AT bonfanteestevama residualstressestimatedbynanoindentationinponticsandabutmentsofveneeredzirconiafixeddentalprostheses
_version_ 1756428970109173760