Factors influencing orthodontic treatment time for non-surgical Class III malocclusion

ABSTRACT To improve orthodontic treatment efficiency, orthodontists must know which variables could interfere with orthodontic treatment time. Objective: To identify variables and their effect size on orthodontic treatment time of Class III malocclusion. Material and Methods: Forty-five Class III malocclusion cases were selected from 2008 patients’ records. Clinical charts, cephalometric radiographs, and pre and posttreatment dental casts were evaluated. Age, sex, PAR index at T1 and T2, overjet, missing teeth, extractions, number of treatment phases, missed appointments, appliance breakages, and cephalometric variables SNA, SNB, ANB, Wits, SnGoGn, CoA, CoGn, IMPA, 1.PP were investigated by multiple linear regression analysis and stepwise method at p<0.05. The sample was also divided into two groups: Group 0-2 (patients who had missed two clinical appointments or less) and Group >2 (patients who missed more than 2 appointments), to detect the influence of this data on treatment time and the quality of the treatment (PAR T2). Results: Average treatment time was 30.27 months. Multiple regression analysis showed that missed appointment (R2=0.4345) and appliance breakages (R2=0.0596) are the only variables able to significantly predict treatment duration. Treatment time for patients who missed more than 2 appointments was nearly one year longer. However, no significant influence on PAR T2 was observed for those patients. Conclusion: Orthodontic treatment duration in Class III patients is mainly influenced by factors related to patient compliance. Patients who missed more appointments did not show worse orthodontic finishing, but longer treatment. No occlusal, cephalometric, or demographic variable obtained before treatment was able to give some significant prediction about treatment time in Class III patients.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bichara,Lívia Monteiro, Aragón,Mônica Lídia Castro de, Brandão,Gustavo Antônio Martins, Normando,David
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572016000500431
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1678-77572016000500431
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1678-775720160005004312016-10-28Factors influencing orthodontic treatment time for non-surgical Class III malocclusionBichara,Lívia MonteiroAragón,Mônica Lídia Castro deBrandão,Gustavo Antônio MartinsNormando,David Orthodontics treatment Angle Class III malocclusion Treatment efficiency ABSTRACT To improve orthodontic treatment efficiency, orthodontists must know which variables could interfere with orthodontic treatment time. Objective: To identify variables and their effect size on orthodontic treatment time of Class III malocclusion. Material and Methods: Forty-five Class III malocclusion cases were selected from 2008 patients’ records. Clinical charts, cephalometric radiographs, and pre and posttreatment dental casts were evaluated. Age, sex, PAR index at T1 and T2, overjet, missing teeth, extractions, number of treatment phases, missed appointments, appliance breakages, and cephalometric variables SNA, SNB, ANB, Wits, SnGoGn, CoA, CoGn, IMPA, 1.PP were investigated by multiple linear regression analysis and stepwise method at p<0.05. The sample was also divided into two groups: Group 0-2 (patients who had missed two clinical appointments or less) and Group >2 (patients who missed more than 2 appointments), to detect the influence of this data on treatment time and the quality of the treatment (PAR T2). Results: Average treatment time was 30.27 months. Multiple regression analysis showed that missed appointment (R2=0.4345) and appliance breakages (R2=0.0596) are the only variables able to significantly predict treatment duration. Treatment time for patients who missed more than 2 appointments was nearly one year longer. However, no significant influence on PAR T2 was observed for those patients. Conclusion: Orthodontic treatment duration in Class III patients is mainly influenced by factors related to patient compliance. Patients who missed more appointments did not show worse orthodontic finishing, but longer treatment. No occlusal, cephalometric, or demographic variable obtained before treatment was able to give some significant prediction about treatment time in Class III patients.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USPJournal of Applied Oral Science v.24 n.5 20162016-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572016000500431en10.1590/1678-775720150353
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Bichara,Lívia Monteiro
Aragón,Mônica Lídia Castro de
Brandão,Gustavo Antônio Martins
Normando,David
spellingShingle Bichara,Lívia Monteiro
Aragón,Mônica Lídia Castro de
Brandão,Gustavo Antônio Martins
Normando,David
Factors influencing orthodontic treatment time for non-surgical Class III malocclusion
author_facet Bichara,Lívia Monteiro
Aragón,Mônica Lídia Castro de
Brandão,Gustavo Antônio Martins
Normando,David
author_sort Bichara,Lívia Monteiro
title Factors influencing orthodontic treatment time for non-surgical Class III malocclusion
title_short Factors influencing orthodontic treatment time for non-surgical Class III malocclusion
title_full Factors influencing orthodontic treatment time for non-surgical Class III malocclusion
title_fullStr Factors influencing orthodontic treatment time for non-surgical Class III malocclusion
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing orthodontic treatment time for non-surgical Class III malocclusion
title_sort factors influencing orthodontic treatment time for non-surgical class iii malocclusion
description ABSTRACT To improve orthodontic treatment efficiency, orthodontists must know which variables could interfere with orthodontic treatment time. Objective: To identify variables and their effect size on orthodontic treatment time of Class III malocclusion. Material and Methods: Forty-five Class III malocclusion cases were selected from 2008 patients’ records. Clinical charts, cephalometric radiographs, and pre and posttreatment dental casts were evaluated. Age, sex, PAR index at T1 and T2, overjet, missing teeth, extractions, number of treatment phases, missed appointments, appliance breakages, and cephalometric variables SNA, SNB, ANB, Wits, SnGoGn, CoA, CoGn, IMPA, 1.PP were investigated by multiple linear regression analysis and stepwise method at p<0.05. The sample was also divided into two groups: Group 0-2 (patients who had missed two clinical appointments or less) and Group >2 (patients who missed more than 2 appointments), to detect the influence of this data on treatment time and the quality of the treatment (PAR T2). Results: Average treatment time was 30.27 months. Multiple regression analysis showed that missed appointment (R2=0.4345) and appliance breakages (R2=0.0596) are the only variables able to significantly predict treatment duration. Treatment time for patients who missed more than 2 appointments was nearly one year longer. However, no significant influence on PAR T2 was observed for those patients. Conclusion: Orthodontic treatment duration in Class III patients is mainly influenced by factors related to patient compliance. Patients who missed more appointments did not show worse orthodontic finishing, but longer treatment. No occlusal, cephalometric, or demographic variable obtained before treatment was able to give some significant prediction about treatment time in Class III patients.
publisher Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572016000500431
work_keys_str_mv AT bicharaliviamonteiro factorsinfluencingorthodontictreatmenttimefornonsurgicalclassiiimalocclusion
AT aragonmonicalidiacastrode factorsinfluencingorthodontictreatmenttimefornonsurgicalclassiiimalocclusion
AT brandaogustavoantoniomartins factorsinfluencingorthodontictreatmenttimefornonsurgicalclassiiimalocclusion
AT normandodavid factorsinfluencingorthodontictreatmenttimefornonsurgicalclassiiimalocclusion
_version_ 1756428902872383488