CO2 laser and/or fluoride enamel treatment against in situ/ex vivo erosive challenge

ABSTRACT Objective This in situ/ex vivo study investigated the effect of CO2 laser irradiation and acidulated phosphate fluoride gel (APF) application, separately and in combination, on enamel resistance to erosion. Material and Methods During 2 experimental 5-day crossover phases, 8 volunteers wore intraoral appliances containing bovine enamel blocks which were submitted to four groups: 1st phase - control, untreated and CO2 laser irradiation, 2nd phase - fluoride application and fluoride application before CO2 laser irradiation. Laser irradiation was performed at 10.6 µm wavelength, 5 µs pulse duration and 50 Hz frequency, with average power input and output of 2.3 W and 2.0 W, respectively (28.6 J/cm2). APF gel (1.23%F, pH 3.5) was applied on enamel surface with a microbrush and left on for 4 minutes. Then, the enamel blocks were fixed at the intraoral appliance level. The erosion was performed extraorally 4 times daily for 5 min in 150 mL of cola drink. Enamel loss was measured profilometrically after treatment and after the in situ phase. The data were tested using one-way Repeated Measures Anova and Tukey's test (p<0.05). Results CO2 laser alone (2.00±0.39 µm) did not show any significantly preventive effect against enamel erosion when compared with the control group (2.41±1.20 µm). Fluoride treated enamel, associated (1.50±0.30 µm) or not (1.47±0.63 µm) with laser irradiation, significantly differed from the control. Conclusion The APF application decreased enamel wear; however, CO2 laser irradiation did not enhance fluoride ability to reduce enamel wear.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: JORDÃO,Maísa Camillo, FORTI,Gustavo Manzano, NAVARRO,Ricardo Scarparo, FREITAS,Patrícia Moreira, HONÓRIO,Heitor Marques, RIOS,Daniela
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2016
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572016000300223
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1678-77572016000300223
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1678-775720160003002232016-06-30CO2 laser and/or fluoride enamel treatment against in situ/ex vivo erosive challengeJORDÃO,Maísa CamilloFORTI,Gustavo ManzanoNAVARRO,Ricardo ScarparoFREITAS,Patrícia MoreiraHONÓRIO,Heitor MarquesRIOS,Daniela Dental enamel Tooth erosion Acidulated phosphate fluoride Lasers ABSTRACT Objective This in situ/ex vivo study investigated the effect of CO2 laser irradiation and acidulated phosphate fluoride gel (APF) application, separately and in combination, on enamel resistance to erosion. Material and Methods During 2 experimental 5-day crossover phases, 8 volunteers wore intraoral appliances containing bovine enamel blocks which were submitted to four groups: 1st phase - control, untreated and CO2 laser irradiation, 2nd phase - fluoride application and fluoride application before CO2 laser irradiation. Laser irradiation was performed at 10.6 µm wavelength, 5 µs pulse duration and 50 Hz frequency, with average power input and output of 2.3 W and 2.0 W, respectively (28.6 J/cm2). APF gel (1.23%F, pH 3.5) was applied on enamel surface with a microbrush and left on for 4 minutes. Then, the enamel blocks were fixed at the intraoral appliance level. The erosion was performed extraorally 4 times daily for 5 min in 150 mL of cola drink. Enamel loss was measured profilometrically after treatment and after the in situ phase. The data were tested using one-way Repeated Measures Anova and Tukey's test (p<0.05). Results CO2 laser alone (2.00±0.39 µm) did not show any significantly preventive effect against enamel erosion when compared with the control group (2.41±1.20 µm). Fluoride treated enamel, associated (1.50±0.30 µm) or not (1.47±0.63 µm) with laser irradiation, significantly differed from the control. Conclusion The APF application decreased enamel wear; however, CO2 laser irradiation did not enhance fluoride ability to reduce enamel wear.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USPJournal of Applied Oral Science v.24 n.3 20162016-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572016000300223en10.1590/1678-775720150399
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author JORDÃO,Maísa Camillo
FORTI,Gustavo Manzano
NAVARRO,Ricardo Scarparo
FREITAS,Patrícia Moreira
HONÓRIO,Heitor Marques
RIOS,Daniela
spellingShingle JORDÃO,Maísa Camillo
FORTI,Gustavo Manzano
NAVARRO,Ricardo Scarparo
FREITAS,Patrícia Moreira
HONÓRIO,Heitor Marques
RIOS,Daniela
CO2 laser and/or fluoride enamel treatment against in situ/ex vivo erosive challenge
author_facet JORDÃO,Maísa Camillo
FORTI,Gustavo Manzano
NAVARRO,Ricardo Scarparo
FREITAS,Patrícia Moreira
HONÓRIO,Heitor Marques
RIOS,Daniela
author_sort JORDÃO,Maísa Camillo
title CO2 laser and/or fluoride enamel treatment against in situ/ex vivo erosive challenge
title_short CO2 laser and/or fluoride enamel treatment against in situ/ex vivo erosive challenge
title_full CO2 laser and/or fluoride enamel treatment against in situ/ex vivo erosive challenge
title_fullStr CO2 laser and/or fluoride enamel treatment against in situ/ex vivo erosive challenge
title_full_unstemmed CO2 laser and/or fluoride enamel treatment against in situ/ex vivo erosive challenge
title_sort co2 laser and/or fluoride enamel treatment against in situ/ex vivo erosive challenge
description ABSTRACT Objective This in situ/ex vivo study investigated the effect of CO2 laser irradiation and acidulated phosphate fluoride gel (APF) application, separately and in combination, on enamel resistance to erosion. Material and Methods During 2 experimental 5-day crossover phases, 8 volunteers wore intraoral appliances containing bovine enamel blocks which were submitted to four groups: 1st phase - control, untreated and CO2 laser irradiation, 2nd phase - fluoride application and fluoride application before CO2 laser irradiation. Laser irradiation was performed at 10.6 µm wavelength, 5 µs pulse duration and 50 Hz frequency, with average power input and output of 2.3 W and 2.0 W, respectively (28.6 J/cm2). APF gel (1.23%F, pH 3.5) was applied on enamel surface with a microbrush and left on for 4 minutes. Then, the enamel blocks were fixed at the intraoral appliance level. The erosion was performed extraorally 4 times daily for 5 min in 150 mL of cola drink. Enamel loss was measured profilometrically after treatment and after the in situ phase. The data were tested using one-way Repeated Measures Anova and Tukey's test (p<0.05). Results CO2 laser alone (2.00±0.39 µm) did not show any significantly preventive effect against enamel erosion when compared with the control group (2.41±1.20 µm). Fluoride treated enamel, associated (1.50±0.30 µm) or not (1.47±0.63 µm) with laser irradiation, significantly differed from the control. Conclusion The APF application decreased enamel wear; however, CO2 laser irradiation did not enhance fluoride ability to reduce enamel wear.
publisher Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publishDate 2016
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572016000300223
work_keys_str_mv AT jordaomaisacamillo co2laserandorfluorideenameltreatmentagainstinsituexvivoerosivechallenge
AT fortigustavomanzano co2laserandorfluorideenameltreatmentagainstinsituexvivoerosivechallenge
AT navarroricardoscarparo co2laserandorfluorideenameltreatmentagainstinsituexvivoerosivechallenge
AT freitaspatriciamoreira co2laserandorfluorideenameltreatmentagainstinsituexvivoerosivechallenge
AT honorioheitormarques co2laserandorfluorideenameltreatmentagainstinsituexvivoerosivechallenge
AT riosdaniela co2laserandorfluorideenameltreatmentagainstinsituexvivoerosivechallenge
_version_ 1756428898983215104