Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption

OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of coronal and sagittal CT sections to detect cavities simulating root resorption. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 60 mandibular incisors were embedded in plaster bases, and cavities with 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 mm in diameter and 0.3, 0.6 or 0.9 mm in depth (small, medium and large cavities) were drilled on the buccal surfaces with high-speed round burs with diameters of 0.6, 1.2 and 1.8 mm to simulate external inflammatory root resorption. Simulations in the cervical, middle and apical thirds of each tooth root were made randomly. The Dental Scan software was used to obtain 1-mm-thick axial images from direct scanning, which were reconstructed in the coronal and sagittal planes using 3D software (Syngo FastView). Each series was loaded into the software. Fourteen images of each tooth were reconstructed in the coronal plane and 14 in the sagittal plane. A total of 1,652 images were obtained for analysis. Series information, tooth number and the plane reconstructed were stored. The images generated were saved on a CD-ROM together with the visualization software (Syngo FastView). Images were analyzed by a previously calibrated blinded, radiologist. Cochran's Q test was conducted separately for each region analyzed followed by pair-wise comparison by the McNemar test (p=0.05). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference (p&gt;0.05) was observed in the diagnosis of simulated resorption between the apical, middle, and coronal thirds. When the axial plane was assessed separately, diagnoses were statistically different (p<0.05) among the three root thirds. The apical third differed significantly (p<0.05) from the cervical and middle thirds. Diagnostic errors were more often observed in the apical third compared to the cervical and middle thirds. Mid-sized cavities revealed no statistically significant differences (p&gt;0.05) between planes, irrespective of the third in which the resorptions were located. CONCLUSION: When tomographic sections are requested for the diagnosis of buccal or lingual external root resorption, sagittal sections afford the best image characterization of the resorption process.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lermen,Cláudio Afonso, Liedke,Gabriela Salatino, Silveira,Heloísa Emília Dias da, Silveira,Heraldo Luis Dias da, Mazzola,Alessandro André, Figueiredo,José Antônio Poli de
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2010
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000300019
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1678-77572010000300019
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1678-775720100003000192010-08-31Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorptionLermen,Cláudio AfonsoLiedke,Gabriela SalatinoSilveira,Heloísa Emília Dias daSilveira,Heraldo Luis Dias daMazzola,Alessandro AndréFigueiredo,José Antônio Poli de Tomography External root resorption Diagnosis OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of coronal and sagittal CT sections to detect cavities simulating root resorption. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 60 mandibular incisors were embedded in plaster bases, and cavities with 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 mm in diameter and 0.3, 0.6 or 0.9 mm in depth (small, medium and large cavities) were drilled on the buccal surfaces with high-speed round burs with diameters of 0.6, 1.2 and 1.8 mm to simulate external inflammatory root resorption. Simulations in the cervical, middle and apical thirds of each tooth root were made randomly. The Dental Scan software was used to obtain 1-mm-thick axial images from direct scanning, which were reconstructed in the coronal and sagittal planes using 3D software (Syngo FastView). Each series was loaded into the software. Fourteen images of each tooth were reconstructed in the coronal plane and 14 in the sagittal plane. A total of 1,652 images were obtained for analysis. Series information, tooth number and the plane reconstructed were stored. The images generated were saved on a CD-ROM together with the visualization software (Syngo FastView). Images were analyzed by a previously calibrated blinded, radiologist. Cochran's Q test was conducted separately for each region analyzed followed by pair-wise comparison by the McNemar test (p=0.05). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference (p&gt;0.05) was observed in the diagnosis of simulated resorption between the apical, middle, and coronal thirds. When the axial plane was assessed separately, diagnoses were statistically different (p<0.05) among the three root thirds. The apical third differed significantly (p<0.05) from the cervical and middle thirds. Diagnostic errors were more often observed in the apical third compared to the cervical and middle thirds. Mid-sized cavities revealed no statistically significant differences (p&gt;0.05) between planes, irrespective of the third in which the resorptions were located. CONCLUSION: When tomographic sections are requested for the diagnosis of buccal or lingual external root resorption, sagittal sections afford the best image characterization of the resorption process.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USPJournal of Applied Oral Science v.18 n.3 20102010-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000300019en10.1590/S1678-77572010000300019
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Lermen,Cláudio Afonso
Liedke,Gabriela Salatino
Silveira,Heloísa Emília Dias da
Silveira,Heraldo Luis Dias da
Mazzola,Alessandro André
Figueiredo,José Antônio Poli de
spellingShingle Lermen,Cláudio Afonso
Liedke,Gabriela Salatino
Silveira,Heloísa Emília Dias da
Silveira,Heraldo Luis Dias da
Mazzola,Alessandro André
Figueiredo,José Antônio Poli de
Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption
author_facet Lermen,Cláudio Afonso
Liedke,Gabriela Salatino
Silveira,Heloísa Emília Dias da
Silveira,Heraldo Luis Dias da
Mazzola,Alessandro André
Figueiredo,José Antônio Poli de
author_sort Lermen,Cláudio Afonso
title Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption
title_short Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption
title_full Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption
title_fullStr Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption
title_sort comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the accuracy of coronal and sagittal CT sections to detect cavities simulating root resorption. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 60 mandibular incisors were embedded in plaster bases, and cavities with 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 mm in diameter and 0.3, 0.6 or 0.9 mm in depth (small, medium and large cavities) were drilled on the buccal surfaces with high-speed round burs with diameters of 0.6, 1.2 and 1.8 mm to simulate external inflammatory root resorption. Simulations in the cervical, middle and apical thirds of each tooth root were made randomly. The Dental Scan software was used to obtain 1-mm-thick axial images from direct scanning, which were reconstructed in the coronal and sagittal planes using 3D software (Syngo FastView). Each series was loaded into the software. Fourteen images of each tooth were reconstructed in the coronal plane and 14 in the sagittal plane. A total of 1,652 images were obtained for analysis. Series information, tooth number and the plane reconstructed were stored. The images generated were saved on a CD-ROM together with the visualization software (Syngo FastView). Images were analyzed by a previously calibrated blinded, radiologist. Cochran's Q test was conducted separately for each region analyzed followed by pair-wise comparison by the McNemar test (p=0.05). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference (p&gt;0.05) was observed in the diagnosis of simulated resorption between the apical, middle, and coronal thirds. When the axial plane was assessed separately, diagnoses were statistically different (p<0.05) among the three root thirds. The apical third differed significantly (p<0.05) from the cervical and middle thirds. Diagnostic errors were more often observed in the apical third compared to the cervical and middle thirds. Mid-sized cavities revealed no statistically significant differences (p&gt;0.05) between planes, irrespective of the third in which the resorptions were located. CONCLUSION: When tomographic sections are requested for the diagnosis of buccal or lingual external root resorption, sagittal sections afford the best image characterization of the resorption process.
publisher Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publishDate 2010
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572010000300019
work_keys_str_mv AT lermenclaudioafonso comparisonbetweentwotomographicsectionsinthediagnosisofexternalrootresorption
AT liedkegabrielasalatino comparisonbetweentwotomographicsectionsinthediagnosisofexternalrootresorption
AT silveiraheloisaemiliadiasda comparisonbetweentwotomographicsectionsinthediagnosisofexternalrootresorption
AT silveiraheraldoluisdiasda comparisonbetweentwotomographicsectionsinthediagnosisofexternalrootresorption
AT mazzolaalessandroandre comparisonbetweentwotomographicsectionsinthediagnosisofexternalrootresorption
AT figueiredojoseantoniopolide comparisonbetweentwotomographicsectionsinthediagnosisofexternalrootresorption
_version_ 1756428814411366400