Bond strength and morphology of enamel using self-etching adhesive systems with different acidities

OBJECTIVES: To assess the bond strength and the morphology of enamel after application of self-etching adhesive systems with different acidities. The tested hypothesis was that the performance of the self-etching adhesive systems does not vary for the studied parameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Composite resin (Filtek Z250) buildups were bonded to untreated (prophylaxis) and treated (bur-cut or SiC-paper) enamel surfaces of third molars after application of four self-etching and two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems (n=6/condition): Clearfil SE Bond (CSE); OptiBond Solo Plus Self-Etch (OP); AdheSe (AD); Tyrian Self Priming Etching (TY), Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SBMP) and Adper Single Bond (SB). After storage in water (24 h/37°C), the bonded specimens were sectioned into sticks with 0.8 mm² cross-sectional area and the microtensile bond strength was tested at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The mean bond strength values (MPa) were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). The etching patterns of the adhesive systems were also observed with a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: The main factor adhesive system was statistically significant (p<0.05). The mean bond strength values (MPa) and standard deviations were: CSE (20.5±3.5), OP (11.3±2.3), AD (11.2±2.8), TY (11.1±3.0), SBMP (21.9±4.0) and SB (24.9±3.0). Different etching patterns were observed for the self-etching primers depending on the enamel treatment and the pH of the adhesive system. CONCLUSION: Although there is a tendency towards using adhesive systems with simplified application procedures, this may compromise the bonding performance of some systems to enamel, even when the prismless enamel is removed.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moura,Sandra Kiss, Reis,Alessandra, Pelizzaro,Arlete, Dal-Bianco,Karen, Loguercio,Alessandro Dourado, Arana-Chavez,Victor Elias, Grande,Rosa Helena Miranda
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2009
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000400009
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1678-77572009000400009
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1678-775720090004000092009-07-30Bond strength and morphology of enamel using self-etching adhesive systems with different aciditiesMoura,Sandra KissReis,AlessandraPelizzaro,ArleteDal-Bianco,KarenLoguercio,Alessandro DouradoArana-Chavez,Victor EliasGrande,Rosa Helena Miranda Enamel Bonding Adhesive systems Morphology OBJECTIVES: To assess the bond strength and the morphology of enamel after application of self-etching adhesive systems with different acidities. The tested hypothesis was that the performance of the self-etching adhesive systems does not vary for the studied parameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Composite resin (Filtek Z250) buildups were bonded to untreated (prophylaxis) and treated (bur-cut or SiC-paper) enamel surfaces of third molars after application of four self-etching and two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems (n=6/condition): Clearfil SE Bond (CSE); OptiBond Solo Plus Self-Etch (OP); AdheSe (AD); Tyrian Self Priming Etching (TY), Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SBMP) and Adper Single Bond (SB). After storage in water (24 h/37°C), the bonded specimens were sectioned into sticks with 0.8 mm² cross-sectional area and the microtensile bond strength was tested at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The mean bond strength values (MPa) were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). The etching patterns of the adhesive systems were also observed with a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: The main factor adhesive system was statistically significant (p<0.05). The mean bond strength values (MPa) and standard deviations were: CSE (20.5±3.5), OP (11.3±2.3), AD (11.2±2.8), TY (11.1±3.0), SBMP (21.9±4.0) and SB (24.9±3.0). Different etching patterns were observed for the self-etching primers depending on the enamel treatment and the pH of the adhesive system. CONCLUSION: Although there is a tendency towards using adhesive systems with simplified application procedures, this may compromise the bonding performance of some systems to enamel, even when the prismless enamel is removed.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USPJournal of Applied Oral Science v.17 n.4 20092009-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000400009en10.1590/S1678-77572009000400009
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Moura,Sandra Kiss
Reis,Alessandra
Pelizzaro,Arlete
Dal-Bianco,Karen
Loguercio,Alessandro Dourado
Arana-Chavez,Victor Elias
Grande,Rosa Helena Miranda
spellingShingle Moura,Sandra Kiss
Reis,Alessandra
Pelizzaro,Arlete
Dal-Bianco,Karen
Loguercio,Alessandro Dourado
Arana-Chavez,Victor Elias
Grande,Rosa Helena Miranda
Bond strength and morphology of enamel using self-etching adhesive systems with different acidities
author_facet Moura,Sandra Kiss
Reis,Alessandra
Pelizzaro,Arlete
Dal-Bianco,Karen
Loguercio,Alessandro Dourado
Arana-Chavez,Victor Elias
Grande,Rosa Helena Miranda
author_sort Moura,Sandra Kiss
title Bond strength and morphology of enamel using self-etching adhesive systems with different acidities
title_short Bond strength and morphology of enamel using self-etching adhesive systems with different acidities
title_full Bond strength and morphology of enamel using self-etching adhesive systems with different acidities
title_fullStr Bond strength and morphology of enamel using self-etching adhesive systems with different acidities
title_full_unstemmed Bond strength and morphology of enamel using self-etching adhesive systems with different acidities
title_sort bond strength and morphology of enamel using self-etching adhesive systems with different acidities
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the bond strength and the morphology of enamel after application of self-etching adhesive systems with different acidities. The tested hypothesis was that the performance of the self-etching adhesive systems does not vary for the studied parameters. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Composite resin (Filtek Z250) buildups were bonded to untreated (prophylaxis) and treated (bur-cut or SiC-paper) enamel surfaces of third molars after application of four self-etching and two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems (n=6/condition): Clearfil SE Bond (CSE); OptiBond Solo Plus Self-Etch (OP); AdheSe (AD); Tyrian Self Priming Etching (TY), Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (SBMP) and Adper Single Bond (SB). After storage in water (24 h/37°C), the bonded specimens were sectioned into sticks with 0.8 mm² cross-sectional area and the microtensile bond strength was tested at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The mean bond strength values (MPa) were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05). The etching patterns of the adhesive systems were also observed with a scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: The main factor adhesive system was statistically significant (p<0.05). The mean bond strength values (MPa) and standard deviations were: CSE (20.5±3.5), OP (11.3±2.3), AD (11.2±2.8), TY (11.1±3.0), SBMP (21.9±4.0) and SB (24.9±3.0). Different etching patterns were observed for the self-etching primers depending on the enamel treatment and the pH of the adhesive system. CONCLUSION: Although there is a tendency towards using adhesive systems with simplified application procedures, this may compromise the bonding performance of some systems to enamel, even when the prismless enamel is removed.
publisher Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publishDate 2009
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572009000400009
work_keys_str_mv AT mourasandrakiss bondstrengthandmorphologyofenamelusingselfetchingadhesivesystemswithdifferentacidities
AT reisalessandra bondstrengthandmorphologyofenamelusingselfetchingadhesivesystemswithdifferentacidities
AT pelizzaroarlete bondstrengthandmorphologyofenamelusingselfetchingadhesivesystemswithdifferentacidities
AT dalbiancokaren bondstrengthandmorphologyofenamelusingselfetchingadhesivesystemswithdifferentacidities
AT loguercioalessandrodourado bondstrengthandmorphologyofenamelusingselfetchingadhesivesystemswithdifferentacidities
AT aranachavezvictorelias bondstrengthandmorphologyofenamelusingselfetchingadhesivesystemswithdifferentacidities
AT granderosahelenamiranda bondstrengthandmorphologyofenamelusingselfetchingadhesivesystemswithdifferentacidities
_version_ 1756428796671557632