Volumetric polymerization shrinkage of contemporary composite resins

The polymerization shrinkage of composite resins may affect negatively the clinical outcome of the restoration. Extensive research has been carried out to develop new formulations of composite resins in order to provide good handling characteristics and some dimensional stability during polymerization. The purpose of this study was to analyze, in vitro, the magnitude of the volumetric polymerization shrinkage of 7 contemporary composite resins (Definite, Suprafill, SureFil, Filtek Z250, Fill Magic, Alert, and Solitaire) to determine whether there are differences among these materials. The tests were conducted with precision of 0.1 mg. The volumetric shrinkage was measured by hydrostatic weighing before and after polymerization and calculated by known mathematical equations. One-way ANOVA (<FONT FACE=Symbol>a</font > or = 0.05) was used to determine statistically significant differences in volumetric shrinkage among the tested composite resins. Suprafill (1.87±0.01) and Definite (1.89±0.01) shrank significantly less than the other composite resins. SureFil (2.01±0.06), Filtek Z250 (1.99±0.03), and Fill Magic (2.02±0.02) presented intermediate levels of polymerization shrinkage. Alert and Solitaire presented the highest degree of polymerization shrinkage. Knowing the polymerization shrinkage rates of the commercially available composite resins, the dentist would be able to choose between using composite resins with lower polymerization shrinkage rates or adopting technical or operational procedures to minimize the adverse effects deriving from resin contraction during light-activation.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nagem Filho,Halim, Nagem,Haline Drumond, Francisconi,Paulo Afonso Silveira, Franco,Eduardo Batista, Mondelli,Rafael Francisco Lia, Coutinho,Kennedy Queiroz
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP 2007
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572007000500014
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1678-77572007000500014
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1678-775720070005000142007-11-06Volumetric polymerization shrinkage of contemporary composite resinsNagem Filho,HalimNagem,Haline DrumondFrancisconi,Paulo Afonso SilveiraFranco,Eduardo BatistaMondelli,Rafael Francisco LiaCoutinho,Kennedy Queiroz Composite resins Polymerization shrinkage The polymerization shrinkage of composite resins may affect negatively the clinical outcome of the restoration. Extensive research has been carried out to develop new formulations of composite resins in order to provide good handling characteristics and some dimensional stability during polymerization. The purpose of this study was to analyze, in vitro, the magnitude of the volumetric polymerization shrinkage of 7 contemporary composite resins (Definite, Suprafill, SureFil, Filtek Z250, Fill Magic, Alert, and Solitaire) to determine whether there are differences among these materials. The tests were conducted with precision of 0.1 mg. The volumetric shrinkage was measured by hydrostatic weighing before and after polymerization and calculated by known mathematical equations. One-way ANOVA (<FONT FACE=Symbol>a</font > or = 0.05) was used to determine statistically significant differences in volumetric shrinkage among the tested composite resins. Suprafill (1.87±0.01) and Definite (1.89±0.01) shrank significantly less than the other composite resins. SureFil (2.01±0.06), Filtek Z250 (1.99±0.03), and Fill Magic (2.02±0.02) presented intermediate levels of polymerization shrinkage. Alert and Solitaire presented the highest degree of polymerization shrinkage. Knowing the polymerization shrinkage rates of the commercially available composite resins, the dentist would be able to choose between using composite resins with lower polymerization shrinkage rates or adopting technical or operational procedures to minimize the adverse effects deriving from resin contraction during light-activation.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USPJournal of Applied Oral Science v.15 n.5 20072007-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572007000500014en10.1590/S1678-77572007000500014
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Nagem Filho,Halim
Nagem,Haline Drumond
Francisconi,Paulo Afonso Silveira
Franco,Eduardo Batista
Mondelli,Rafael Francisco Lia
Coutinho,Kennedy Queiroz
spellingShingle Nagem Filho,Halim
Nagem,Haline Drumond
Francisconi,Paulo Afonso Silveira
Franco,Eduardo Batista
Mondelli,Rafael Francisco Lia
Coutinho,Kennedy Queiroz
Volumetric polymerization shrinkage of contemporary composite resins
author_facet Nagem Filho,Halim
Nagem,Haline Drumond
Francisconi,Paulo Afonso Silveira
Franco,Eduardo Batista
Mondelli,Rafael Francisco Lia
Coutinho,Kennedy Queiroz
author_sort Nagem Filho,Halim
title Volumetric polymerization shrinkage of contemporary composite resins
title_short Volumetric polymerization shrinkage of contemporary composite resins
title_full Volumetric polymerization shrinkage of contemporary composite resins
title_fullStr Volumetric polymerization shrinkage of contemporary composite resins
title_full_unstemmed Volumetric polymerization shrinkage of contemporary composite resins
title_sort volumetric polymerization shrinkage of contemporary composite resins
description The polymerization shrinkage of composite resins may affect negatively the clinical outcome of the restoration. Extensive research has been carried out to develop new formulations of composite resins in order to provide good handling characteristics and some dimensional stability during polymerization. The purpose of this study was to analyze, in vitro, the magnitude of the volumetric polymerization shrinkage of 7 contemporary composite resins (Definite, Suprafill, SureFil, Filtek Z250, Fill Magic, Alert, and Solitaire) to determine whether there are differences among these materials. The tests were conducted with precision of 0.1 mg. The volumetric shrinkage was measured by hydrostatic weighing before and after polymerization and calculated by known mathematical equations. One-way ANOVA (<FONT FACE=Symbol>a</font > or = 0.05) was used to determine statistically significant differences in volumetric shrinkage among the tested composite resins. Suprafill (1.87±0.01) and Definite (1.89±0.01) shrank significantly less than the other composite resins. SureFil (2.01±0.06), Filtek Z250 (1.99±0.03), and Fill Magic (2.02±0.02) presented intermediate levels of polymerization shrinkage. Alert and Solitaire presented the highest degree of polymerization shrinkage. Knowing the polymerization shrinkage rates of the commercially available composite resins, the dentist would be able to choose between using composite resins with lower polymerization shrinkage rates or adopting technical or operational procedures to minimize the adverse effects deriving from resin contraction during light-activation.
publisher Faculdade De Odontologia De Bauru - USP
publishDate 2007
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-77572007000500014
work_keys_str_mv AT nagemfilhohalim volumetricpolymerizationshrinkageofcontemporarycompositeresins
AT nagemhalinedrumond volumetricpolymerizationshrinkageofcontemporarycompositeresins
AT francisconipauloafonsosilveira volumetricpolymerizationshrinkageofcontemporarycompositeresins
AT francoeduardobatista volumetricpolymerizationshrinkageofcontemporarycompositeresins
AT mondellirafaelfranciscolia volumetricpolymerizationshrinkageofcontemporarycompositeresins
AT coutinhokennedyqueiroz volumetricpolymerizationshrinkageofcontemporarycompositeresins
_version_ 1756428774260342784