Robotic parastomal hernia repair

ABSTRACT Introduction and Objective: Annually, more than one hundred thousand new stomas are created in the United States and near 30-50% of those will develop parastomal hernia (1). Occasionally parastomal hernias may result in life threatening complications such as bowel obstruction or strangulation requiring urgent surgical intervention (2). The minimally invasive surgery for these hernias are preferred, specially when the primary case was either laparoscopic or robot-assisted. Our objective is to demonstrate a step-by-step robotic approach with and without mesh placement and their outcomes in two different scenarios: elective and emergency. Materials and Methods: We present two cases, a 56-year-old male with three years prior robot-assisted radical cystectomy with ileal conduit and a 82-year-old male with five year post operation of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with bilateral ureterostomies. Both of them had parastomal hernia, the first case was an urgency due to bowel obstruction while the second case was an elective procedure. Using three portals, we choose the primary repair for the first case and placement of a biological mesh within the keyhole technique (3) for the second one. Results: In the first case we had an operative time of 110min, total blood loss of 40cc and for the second case an operative time of 140min with total blood loss of 20cc. Both patients were discharged within 24h and had a follow-up of 2 years with no recurrence. Conclusions: The capability for complex sutures and dissection of intracorporeal structures makes the robotic platform a powerful ally (4) and we believe in its superiority over conventional laparoscopy. Although further studies are required, our initial series suggests that the robotic parastomal hernia repair is feasible and reproducible, with or without mesh placement and could be demonstrated its use for either elective or emergency situations.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tobias-Machado,Marcos, Gomes,Daniel Coser, Faria,Eliney Ferreira, Zampolli,Hamilton de Campos
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2021
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382021000200857
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1677-55382021000200857
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1677-553820210002008572021-02-03Robotic parastomal hernia repairTobias-Machado,MarcosGomes,Daniel CoserFaria,Eliney FerreiraZampolli,Hamilton de CamposABSTRACT Introduction and Objective: Annually, more than one hundred thousand new stomas are created in the United States and near 30-50% of those will develop parastomal hernia (1). Occasionally parastomal hernias may result in life threatening complications such as bowel obstruction or strangulation requiring urgent surgical intervention (2). The minimally invasive surgery for these hernias are preferred, specially when the primary case was either laparoscopic or robot-assisted. Our objective is to demonstrate a step-by-step robotic approach with and without mesh placement and their outcomes in two different scenarios: elective and emergency. Materials and Methods: We present two cases, a 56-year-old male with three years prior robot-assisted radical cystectomy with ileal conduit and a 82-year-old male with five year post operation of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with bilateral ureterostomies. Both of them had parastomal hernia, the first case was an urgency due to bowel obstruction while the second case was an elective procedure. Using three portals, we choose the primary repair for the first case and placement of a biological mesh within the keyhole technique (3) for the second one. Results: In the first case we had an operative time of 110min, total blood loss of 40cc and for the second case an operative time of 140min with total blood loss of 20cc. Both patients were discharged within 24h and had a follow-up of 2 years with no recurrence. Conclusions: The capability for complex sutures and dissection of intracorporeal structures makes the robotic platform a powerful ally (4) and we believe in its superiority over conventional laparoscopy. Although further studies are required, our initial series suggests that the robotic parastomal hernia repair is feasible and reproducible, with or without mesh placement and could be demonstrated its use for either elective or emergency situations.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational braz j urol v.47 n.2 20212021-03-01text/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382021000200857en10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.0347
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Tobias-Machado,Marcos
Gomes,Daniel Coser
Faria,Eliney Ferreira
Zampolli,Hamilton de Campos
spellingShingle Tobias-Machado,Marcos
Gomes,Daniel Coser
Faria,Eliney Ferreira
Zampolli,Hamilton de Campos
Robotic parastomal hernia repair
author_facet Tobias-Machado,Marcos
Gomes,Daniel Coser
Faria,Eliney Ferreira
Zampolli,Hamilton de Campos
author_sort Tobias-Machado,Marcos
title Robotic parastomal hernia repair
title_short Robotic parastomal hernia repair
title_full Robotic parastomal hernia repair
title_fullStr Robotic parastomal hernia repair
title_full_unstemmed Robotic parastomal hernia repair
title_sort robotic parastomal hernia repair
description ABSTRACT Introduction and Objective: Annually, more than one hundred thousand new stomas are created in the United States and near 30-50% of those will develop parastomal hernia (1). Occasionally parastomal hernias may result in life threatening complications such as bowel obstruction or strangulation requiring urgent surgical intervention (2). The minimally invasive surgery for these hernias are preferred, specially when the primary case was either laparoscopic or robot-assisted. Our objective is to demonstrate a step-by-step robotic approach with and without mesh placement and their outcomes in two different scenarios: elective and emergency. Materials and Methods: We present two cases, a 56-year-old male with three years prior robot-assisted radical cystectomy with ileal conduit and a 82-year-old male with five year post operation of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with bilateral ureterostomies. Both of them had parastomal hernia, the first case was an urgency due to bowel obstruction while the second case was an elective procedure. Using three portals, we choose the primary repair for the first case and placement of a biological mesh within the keyhole technique (3) for the second one. Results: In the first case we had an operative time of 110min, total blood loss of 40cc and for the second case an operative time of 140min with total blood loss of 20cc. Both patients were discharged within 24h and had a follow-up of 2 years with no recurrence. Conclusions: The capability for complex sutures and dissection of intracorporeal structures makes the robotic platform a powerful ally (4) and we believe in its superiority over conventional laparoscopy. Although further studies are required, our initial series suggests that the robotic parastomal hernia repair is feasible and reproducible, with or without mesh placement and could be demonstrated its use for either elective or emergency situations.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publishDate 2021
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382021000200857
work_keys_str_mv AT tobiasmachadomarcos roboticparastomalherniarepair
AT gomesdanielcoser roboticparastomalherniarepair
AT fariaelineyferreira roboticparastomalherniarepair
AT zampollihamiltondecampos roboticparastomalherniarepair
_version_ 1756428336782901248