Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches

ABSTRACT Background: To date, few series on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have been published. Purpose: To report the experience of two referral centers adopting two different RARP approaches in KTRs. Surgical, oncological and functional results were primary outcomes evaluated in the study. Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 9 KTRs who underwent transperitoneal RARP or Retzius-sparing RARP for PCa from October 2012 to April 2016. Data were reported as median and interquartile range (IQR). Pre- and postoperative outcomes were compared by non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Significant differences were accepted when p ≤ 0.05. Overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Four KTRs underwent a T-RARP and 5 a RS-RARP. Patient median age was 60 (56-63) years. Charlson comorbidity index was 6 (5-6). Preoperative median PSA was 5.6 (5-15) ng / mL. Preoperative Gleason score (GS) was 6 in 5 patients, 7 (3 + 4) in 3, and 8 (4 + 4) in one. Pre- and postoperative creatinine were 1.17 (1.1; 1.4) and 1.3 (1.07; 1.57) mg / dL (p = 0.237), while eGFR was 66 (60-82) and 62 (54-81) mL / min / 1.73m2 (p = 0.553), respectively. One (11.1%) Clavien-Dindo grade II complication occurred. Two extended template lymphadenectomies were performed, both with nodal invasion. These two patients experienced a biochemical recurrence and were subjected to RT. Two patients (22.2%) had PSMs. Median follow-up was 42 months. Seven patients (77.8%) were continent, 5 (55.6%) were potent. Two (22.2%) patients died during follow-up for oncologic unrelated causes. Conclusions: Our series suggests that both RARP approaches are safe and feasible techniques in KTRs for PCa.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mistretta,Francesco Alessandro, Galfano,Antonio, Trapani,Ettore Di, Trapani,Dario Di, Russo,Andrea, Secco,Silvia, Ferro,Matteo, Musi,Gennaro, Bocciardi,Aldo Massimo, Cobelli,Ottavio de
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2019
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000200262
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1677-55382019000200262
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1677-553820190002002622019-05-22Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approachesMistretta,Francesco AlessandroGalfano,AntonioTrapani,Ettore DiTrapani,Dario DiRusso,AndreaSecco,SilviaFerro,MatteoMusi,GennaroBocciardi,Aldo MassimoCobelli,Ottavio de Kidney Transplantation Prostatic Neoplasms Prostatectomy Robotics ABSTRACT Background: To date, few series on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have been published. Purpose: To report the experience of two referral centers adopting two different RARP approaches in KTRs. Surgical, oncological and functional results were primary outcomes evaluated in the study. Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 9 KTRs who underwent transperitoneal RARP or Retzius-sparing RARP for PCa from October 2012 to April 2016. Data were reported as median and interquartile range (IQR). Pre- and postoperative outcomes were compared by non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Significant differences were accepted when p ≤ 0.05. Overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Four KTRs underwent a T-RARP and 5 a RS-RARP. Patient median age was 60 (56-63) years. Charlson comorbidity index was 6 (5-6). Preoperative median PSA was 5.6 (5-15) ng / mL. Preoperative Gleason score (GS) was 6 in 5 patients, 7 (3 + 4) in 3, and 8 (4 + 4) in one. Pre- and postoperative creatinine were 1.17 (1.1; 1.4) and 1.3 (1.07; 1.57) mg / dL (p = 0.237), while eGFR was 66 (60-82) and 62 (54-81) mL / min / 1.73m2 (p = 0.553), respectively. One (11.1%) Clavien-Dindo grade II complication occurred. Two extended template lymphadenectomies were performed, both with nodal invasion. These two patients experienced a biochemical recurrence and were subjected to RT. Two patients (22.2%) had PSMs. Median follow-up was 42 months. Seven patients (77.8%) were continent, 5 (55.6%) were potent. Two (22.2%) patients died during follow-up for oncologic unrelated causes. Conclusions: Our series suggests that both RARP approaches are safe and feasible techniques in KTRs for PCa.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational braz j urol v.45 n.2 20192019-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000200262en10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0308
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Mistretta,Francesco Alessandro
Galfano,Antonio
Trapani,Ettore Di
Trapani,Dario Di
Russo,Andrea
Secco,Silvia
Ferro,Matteo
Musi,Gennaro
Bocciardi,Aldo Massimo
Cobelli,Ottavio de
spellingShingle Mistretta,Francesco Alessandro
Galfano,Antonio
Trapani,Ettore Di
Trapani,Dario Di
Russo,Andrea
Secco,Silvia
Ferro,Matteo
Musi,Gennaro
Bocciardi,Aldo Massimo
Cobelli,Ottavio de
Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches
author_facet Mistretta,Francesco Alessandro
Galfano,Antonio
Trapani,Ettore Di
Trapani,Dario Di
Russo,Andrea
Secco,Silvia
Ferro,Matteo
Musi,Gennaro
Bocciardi,Aldo Massimo
Cobelli,Ottavio de
author_sort Mistretta,Francesco Alessandro
title Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches
title_short Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches
title_full Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches
title_fullStr Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches
title_full_unstemmed Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches
title_sort robot assisted radical prostatectomy in kidney transplant recipients: surgical, oncological and functional outcomes of two different robotic approaches
description ABSTRACT Background: To date, few series on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have been published. Purpose: To report the experience of two referral centers adopting two different RARP approaches in KTRs. Surgical, oncological and functional results were primary outcomes evaluated in the study. Material and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 9 KTRs who underwent transperitoneal RARP or Retzius-sparing RARP for PCa from October 2012 to April 2016. Data were reported as median and interquartile range (IQR). Pre- and postoperative outcomes were compared by non-parametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Significant differences were accepted when p ≤ 0.05. Overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Four KTRs underwent a T-RARP and 5 a RS-RARP. Patient median age was 60 (56-63) years. Charlson comorbidity index was 6 (5-6). Preoperative median PSA was 5.6 (5-15) ng / mL. Preoperative Gleason score (GS) was 6 in 5 patients, 7 (3 + 4) in 3, and 8 (4 + 4) in one. Pre- and postoperative creatinine were 1.17 (1.1; 1.4) and 1.3 (1.07; 1.57) mg / dL (p = 0.237), while eGFR was 66 (60-82) and 62 (54-81) mL / min / 1.73m2 (p = 0.553), respectively. One (11.1%) Clavien-Dindo grade II complication occurred. Two extended template lymphadenectomies were performed, both with nodal invasion. These two patients experienced a biochemical recurrence and were subjected to RT. Two patients (22.2%) had PSMs. Median follow-up was 42 months. Seven patients (77.8%) were continent, 5 (55.6%) were potent. Two (22.2%) patients died during follow-up for oncologic unrelated causes. Conclusions: Our series suggests that both RARP approaches are safe and feasible techniques in KTRs for PCa.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publishDate 2019
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382019000200262
work_keys_str_mv AT mistrettafrancescoalessandro robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches
AT galfanoantonio robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches
AT trapaniettoredi robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches
AT trapanidariodi robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches
AT russoandrea robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches
AT seccosilvia robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches
AT ferromatteo robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches
AT musigennaro robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches
AT bocciardialdomassimo robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches
AT cobelliottaviode robotassistedradicalprostatectomyinkidneytransplantrecipientssurgicaloncologicalandfunctionaloutcomesoftwodifferentroboticapproaches
_version_ 1756428277727100928