Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate retrorenal colon incidence in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) interventions made in our clinic. Materials and Methods Clinical data of 804 PNL patients, accumulated over a 7 year period (2006-2012), was surveyed. The patient files were reviewed retrospectively, and only those who had abdominal computed tomography (CT) images before PNL intervention were included in the study. In the CT images, the position of both the ascending and descending colon in relation to the right and left kidneys were evaluated. Results According to our hospital reports, 394 patients with CT images were included in the present study 27 patients (6.9%) had retrorenal colon, of which 18 (4.6%) were on the left side, 4 (1.0%) on the right side and 5 (1.3%) had bilateral retrorenal colons. Colonic perforation complication was seen only in two patients and the colonic perforation rate was 0.3%. These two cases had no CT images. Conclusions PNL, in the process of becoming the standard treatment modality, is a safe and reliable technique for renal stone treatment. Colonic injury should be taken into consideration during PNL interventions of the lower pole of the kidney (especially on the left side) due to the location of retrorenal colon.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Balasar,Mehmet, Kandemir,Abdülkadir, Poyraz,Necdet, Unal,Yunus, Ozturk,Ahmet
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000200274
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1677-55382015000200274
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1677-553820150002002742015-06-01Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomyBalasar,MehmetKandemir,AbdülkadirPoyraz,NecdetUnal,YunusOzturk,Ahmet Colon Tomography, X-Ray Computed Nephrostomy, Percutaneous Objective The aim of this study was to investigate retrorenal colon incidence in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) interventions made in our clinic. Materials and Methods Clinical data of 804 PNL patients, accumulated over a 7 year period (2006-2012), was surveyed. The patient files were reviewed retrospectively, and only those who had abdominal computed tomography (CT) images before PNL intervention were included in the study. In the CT images, the position of both the ascending and descending colon in relation to the right and left kidneys were evaluated. Results According to our hospital reports, 394 patients with CT images were included in the present study 27 patients (6.9%) had retrorenal colon, of which 18 (4.6%) were on the left side, 4 (1.0%) on the right side and 5 (1.3%) had bilateral retrorenal colons. Colonic perforation complication was seen only in two patients and the colonic perforation rate was 0.3%. These two cases had no CT images. Conclusions PNL, in the process of becoming the standard treatment modality, is a safe and reliable technique for renal stone treatment. Colonic injury should be taken into consideration during PNL interventions of the lower pole of the kidney (especially on the left side) due to the location of retrorenal colon. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational braz j urol v.41 n.2 20152015-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000200274en10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.02.13
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Balasar,Mehmet
Kandemir,Abdülkadir
Poyraz,Necdet
Unal,Yunus
Ozturk,Ahmet
spellingShingle Balasar,Mehmet
Kandemir,Abdülkadir
Poyraz,Necdet
Unal,Yunus
Ozturk,Ahmet
Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
author_facet Balasar,Mehmet
Kandemir,Abdülkadir
Poyraz,Necdet
Unal,Yunus
Ozturk,Ahmet
author_sort Balasar,Mehmet
title Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_short Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_full Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_fullStr Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_sort incidence of retrorenal colon during percutaneous nephrolithotomy
description Objective The aim of this study was to investigate retrorenal colon incidence in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) interventions made in our clinic. Materials and Methods Clinical data of 804 PNL patients, accumulated over a 7 year period (2006-2012), was surveyed. The patient files were reviewed retrospectively, and only those who had abdominal computed tomography (CT) images before PNL intervention were included in the study. In the CT images, the position of both the ascending and descending colon in relation to the right and left kidneys were evaluated. Results According to our hospital reports, 394 patients with CT images were included in the present study 27 patients (6.9%) had retrorenal colon, of which 18 (4.6%) were on the left side, 4 (1.0%) on the right side and 5 (1.3%) had bilateral retrorenal colons. Colonic perforation complication was seen only in two patients and the colonic perforation rate was 0.3%. These two cases had no CT images. Conclusions PNL, in the process of becoming the standard treatment modality, is a safe and reliable technique for renal stone treatment. Colonic injury should be taken into consideration during PNL interventions of the lower pole of the kidney (especially on the left side) due to the location of retrorenal colon.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publishDate 2015
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000200274
work_keys_str_mv AT balasarmehmet incidenceofretrorenalcolonduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT kandemirabdulkadir incidenceofretrorenalcolonduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT poyraznecdet incidenceofretrorenalcolonduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT unalyunus incidenceofretrorenalcolonduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT ozturkahmet incidenceofretrorenalcolonduringpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
_version_ 1756428168675196928