A prospective evaluation of plastibell® circumcision in older children

Introduction and Objective Circumcision is one of the oldest surgical procedures and one of the most frequently performed worldwide. It can be done by many different techniques. This prospective series presents the results of Plastibell® circumcision in children older than 2 years of age, evaluating surgical duration, immediate and late complications, time for plastic device separation and factors associated with it. Materials and Methods We prospectively analyzed 119 children submitted to Plastic Device Circumcision with Plastibell® by only one surgeon from December 2009 to June 2011. In all cases the surgery was done under general anesthesia associated with dorsal penile nerve block. Before surgery length of the penis and latero-lateral diameter of the glans were measured. Surgical duration, time of Plastibell® separation and use of analgesic medication in the post-operative period were evaluated. Patients were followed on days 15, 45, 90 and 120 after surgery. Results Age at surgery varied from 2 to 12.5 (5.9 ± 2.9) years old. Mean surgical time was 3.7 ± 2.0 minutes (1.9 to 9 minutes). Time for plastic device separation ranged from 6 to 26 days (mean: 16 ± 4.2 days), being 14.8 days for children younger than 5 years of age and 17.4 days for those older than 5 years of age (p < 0.0001). The diameter of the Plastibell® does not interfered in separations time (p = 0,484). Late complications occurred in 32 (26.8%) subjects, being the great majority of low clinical significance, especially prepucial adherences, edema of the mucosa and discrete hypertrophy of the scar, all resolving with clinical treatment. One patient still using diaper had meatus stenosis and in one case the Plastibell® device stayed between the glans and the prepuce and needed to be removed manually. conclusions Circumcision using a plastic device is a safe, quick and an easy technique with low complications, that when occur are of low clinical importance and of easy resolution. The mean time for the device to fall is shorter in children under 6 years of age and it is not influenced by the diameter of the device.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Netto,Jose Murillo Bastos, Araujo Jr.,Jose Goncalves de, Noronha,Marcos Flavio de Almeida, Passos,Bruno Rezende, Lopes,Humberto Elias, Bessa Jr.,Jose de, Figueiredo,Andre Avarese
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2013
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382013000400558
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1677-55382013000400558
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1677-553820130004005582013-10-10A prospective evaluation of plastibell® circumcision in older childrenNetto,Jose Murillo BastosAraujo Jr.,Jose Goncalves deNoronha,Marcos Flavio de AlmeidaPassos,Bruno RezendeLopes,Humberto EliasBessa Jr.,Jose deFigueiredo,Andre Avarese Child Prospective Studies Circumcision Phimosis Introduction and Objective Circumcision is one of the oldest surgical procedures and one of the most frequently performed worldwide. It can be done by many different techniques. This prospective series presents the results of Plastibell® circumcision in children older than 2 years of age, evaluating surgical duration, immediate and late complications, time for plastic device separation and factors associated with it. Materials and Methods We prospectively analyzed 119 children submitted to Plastic Device Circumcision with Plastibell® by only one surgeon from December 2009 to June 2011. In all cases the surgery was done under general anesthesia associated with dorsal penile nerve block. Before surgery length of the penis and latero-lateral diameter of the glans were measured. Surgical duration, time of Plastibell® separation and use of analgesic medication in the post-operative period were evaluated. Patients were followed on days 15, 45, 90 and 120 after surgery. Results Age at surgery varied from 2 to 12.5 (5.9 ± 2.9) years old. Mean surgical time was 3.7 ± 2.0 minutes (1.9 to 9 minutes). Time for plastic device separation ranged from 6 to 26 days (mean: 16 ± 4.2 days), being 14.8 days for children younger than 5 years of age and 17.4 days for those older than 5 years of age (p < 0.0001). The diameter of the Plastibell® does not interfered in separations time (p = 0,484). Late complications occurred in 32 (26.8%) subjects, being the great majority of low clinical significance, especially prepucial adherences, edema of the mucosa and discrete hypertrophy of the scar, all resolving with clinical treatment. One patient still using diaper had meatus stenosis and in one case the Plastibell® device stayed between the glans and the prepuce and needed to be removed manually. conclusions Circumcision using a plastic device is a safe, quick and an easy technique with low complications, that when occur are of low clinical importance and of easy resolution. The mean time for the device to fall is shorter in children under 6 years of age and it is not influenced by the diameter of the device. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational braz j urol v.39 n.4 20132013-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382013000400558en10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.04.14
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Netto,Jose Murillo Bastos
Araujo Jr.,Jose Goncalves de
Noronha,Marcos Flavio de Almeida
Passos,Bruno Rezende
Lopes,Humberto Elias
Bessa Jr.,Jose de
Figueiredo,Andre Avarese
spellingShingle Netto,Jose Murillo Bastos
Araujo Jr.,Jose Goncalves de
Noronha,Marcos Flavio de Almeida
Passos,Bruno Rezende
Lopes,Humberto Elias
Bessa Jr.,Jose de
Figueiredo,Andre Avarese
A prospective evaluation of plastibell® circumcision in older children
author_facet Netto,Jose Murillo Bastos
Araujo Jr.,Jose Goncalves de
Noronha,Marcos Flavio de Almeida
Passos,Bruno Rezende
Lopes,Humberto Elias
Bessa Jr.,Jose de
Figueiredo,Andre Avarese
author_sort Netto,Jose Murillo Bastos
title A prospective evaluation of plastibell® circumcision in older children
title_short A prospective evaluation of plastibell® circumcision in older children
title_full A prospective evaluation of plastibell® circumcision in older children
title_fullStr A prospective evaluation of plastibell® circumcision in older children
title_full_unstemmed A prospective evaluation of plastibell® circumcision in older children
title_sort prospective evaluation of plastibell® circumcision in older children
description Introduction and Objective Circumcision is one of the oldest surgical procedures and one of the most frequently performed worldwide. It can be done by many different techniques. This prospective series presents the results of Plastibell® circumcision in children older than 2 years of age, evaluating surgical duration, immediate and late complications, time for plastic device separation and factors associated with it. Materials and Methods We prospectively analyzed 119 children submitted to Plastic Device Circumcision with Plastibell® by only one surgeon from December 2009 to June 2011. In all cases the surgery was done under general anesthesia associated with dorsal penile nerve block. Before surgery length of the penis and latero-lateral diameter of the glans were measured. Surgical duration, time of Plastibell® separation and use of analgesic medication in the post-operative period were evaluated. Patients were followed on days 15, 45, 90 and 120 after surgery. Results Age at surgery varied from 2 to 12.5 (5.9 ± 2.9) years old. Mean surgical time was 3.7 ± 2.0 minutes (1.9 to 9 minutes). Time for plastic device separation ranged from 6 to 26 days (mean: 16 ± 4.2 days), being 14.8 days for children younger than 5 years of age and 17.4 days for those older than 5 years of age (p < 0.0001). The diameter of the Plastibell® does not interfered in separations time (p = 0,484). Late complications occurred in 32 (26.8%) subjects, being the great majority of low clinical significance, especially prepucial adherences, edema of the mucosa and discrete hypertrophy of the scar, all resolving with clinical treatment. One patient still using diaper had meatus stenosis and in one case the Plastibell® device stayed between the glans and the prepuce and needed to be removed manually. conclusions Circumcision using a plastic device is a safe, quick and an easy technique with low complications, that when occur are of low clinical importance and of easy resolution. The mean time for the device to fall is shorter in children under 6 years of age and it is not influenced by the diameter of the device.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publishDate 2013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382013000400558
work_keys_str_mv AT nettojosemurillobastos aprospectiveevaluationofplastibellcircumcisioninolderchildren
AT araujojrjosegoncalvesde aprospectiveevaluationofplastibellcircumcisioninolderchildren
AT noronhamarcosflaviodealmeida aprospectiveevaluationofplastibellcircumcisioninolderchildren
AT passosbrunorezende aprospectiveevaluationofplastibellcircumcisioninolderchildren
AT lopeshumbertoelias aprospectiveevaluationofplastibellcircumcisioninolderchildren
AT bessajrjosede aprospectiveevaluationofplastibellcircumcisioninolderchildren
AT figueiredoandreavarese aprospectiveevaluationofplastibellcircumcisioninolderchildren
AT nettojosemurillobastos prospectiveevaluationofplastibellcircumcisioninolderchildren
AT araujojrjosegoncalvesde prospectiveevaluationofplastibellcircumcisioninolderchildren
AT noronhamarcosflaviodealmeida prospectiveevaluationofplastibellcircumcisioninolderchildren
AT passosbrunorezende prospectiveevaluationofplastibellcircumcisioninolderchildren
AT lopeshumbertoelias prospectiveevaluationofplastibellcircumcisioninolderchildren
AT bessajrjosede prospectiveevaluationofplastibellcircumcisioninolderchildren
AT figueiredoandreavarese prospectiveevaluationofplastibellcircumcisioninolderchildren
_version_ 1756428138155343872