Treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse with and without polypropylene mesh: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial - Part I

Objective To compare the use of polypropylene mesh (PM) and the traditional anterior vaginal wall colporraphy in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse (AVWP) using objective and subjective tests and evaluation of quality of life (QoL). Materials and Methods One hundred women were randomly distributed in two preoperatory groups. The first group (mesh) (n = 45) received a PM implant and the control group (n = 55) was submitted to traditional colporraphy. Postoperatory follow-up was done after 12 months. The primary objective was the correction of the Ba point ≤ -2 POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System) and the secondary objective was the improvement of vaginal symptoms and QoL through ICIQ-VS (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Vaginal Symptoms). Complications related to the use of PM or not were also described. Results There was a significant difference between all POP-Q measures of pre- and postoperatory periods of each group in particular. There was a significant difference of the Ba point of the postoperatory period between the Mesh and Control group. The mean of Ba point in the Mesh group was statistically lower than of the Control group, depicting the better anatomical result of the first group. Both techniques improved vaginal symptoms and QoL. The most frequent complication of the Mesh group was prepubic hematoma in the perioperative period. In 9.3% of the cases treated with mesh it was observed PM exposition at the anterior vaginal wall after 12 months, being most of them treated clinically. Conclusion The treatment of AVWP significantly improved the Ba point in the Mesh group in comparison to the Control group. There were no differences of the vaginal symptoms and QoL between the two groups after 12 months. There were few and low grade complications on both groups.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tamanini,Jose Tadeu Nunes, Tamanini,Mirce Milhomem da Mota, Castro,Renata Cristina de Oliveira Souza, Feldner Jr,Paulo Cezar, Castro,Rodrigo de Aquino, Sartori,Marair Gracio Ferreira, Girao,Manoel Joao Batista Castello
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2013
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382013000400519
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1677-55382013000400519
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1677-553820130004005192013-10-10Treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse with and without polypropylene mesh: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial - Part ITamanini,Jose Tadeu NunesTamanini,Mirce Milhomem da MotaCastro,Renata Cristina de Oliveira SouzaFeldner Jr,Paulo CezarCastro,Rodrigo de AquinoSartori,Marair Gracio FerreiraGirao,Manoel Joao Batista Castello Prolapse Therapeutics Quality of Life Pelvic Floor Disorders Objective To compare the use of polypropylene mesh (PM) and the traditional anterior vaginal wall colporraphy in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse (AVWP) using objective and subjective tests and evaluation of quality of life (QoL). Materials and Methods One hundred women were randomly distributed in two preoperatory groups. The first group (mesh) (n = 45) received a PM implant and the control group (n = 55) was submitted to traditional colporraphy. Postoperatory follow-up was done after 12 months. The primary objective was the correction of the Ba point ≤ -2 POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System) and the secondary objective was the improvement of vaginal symptoms and QoL through ICIQ-VS (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Vaginal Symptoms). Complications related to the use of PM or not were also described. Results There was a significant difference between all POP-Q measures of pre- and postoperatory periods of each group in particular. There was a significant difference of the Ba point of the postoperatory period between the Mesh and Control group. The mean of Ba point in the Mesh group was statistically lower than of the Control group, depicting the better anatomical result of the first group. Both techniques improved vaginal symptoms and QoL. The most frequent complication of the Mesh group was prepubic hematoma in the perioperative period. In 9.3% of the cases treated with mesh it was observed PM exposition at the anterior vaginal wall after 12 months, being most of them treated clinically. Conclusion The treatment of AVWP significantly improved the Ba point in the Mesh group in comparison to the Control group. There were no differences of the vaginal symptoms and QoL between the two groups after 12 months. There were few and low grade complications on both groups. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational braz j urol v.39 n.4 20132013-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382013000400519en10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.04.10
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Tamanini,Jose Tadeu Nunes
Tamanini,Mirce Milhomem da Mota
Castro,Renata Cristina de Oliveira Souza
Feldner Jr,Paulo Cezar
Castro,Rodrigo de Aquino
Sartori,Marair Gracio Ferreira
Girao,Manoel Joao Batista Castello
spellingShingle Tamanini,Jose Tadeu Nunes
Tamanini,Mirce Milhomem da Mota
Castro,Renata Cristina de Oliveira Souza
Feldner Jr,Paulo Cezar
Castro,Rodrigo de Aquino
Sartori,Marair Gracio Ferreira
Girao,Manoel Joao Batista Castello
Treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse with and without polypropylene mesh: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial - Part I
author_facet Tamanini,Jose Tadeu Nunes
Tamanini,Mirce Milhomem da Mota
Castro,Renata Cristina de Oliveira Souza
Feldner Jr,Paulo Cezar
Castro,Rodrigo de Aquino
Sartori,Marair Gracio Ferreira
Girao,Manoel Joao Batista Castello
author_sort Tamanini,Jose Tadeu Nunes
title Treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse with and without polypropylene mesh: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial - Part I
title_short Treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse with and without polypropylene mesh: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial - Part I
title_full Treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse with and without polypropylene mesh: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial - Part I
title_fullStr Treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse with and without polypropylene mesh: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial - Part I
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse with and without polypropylene mesh: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial - Part I
title_sort treatment of anterior vaginal wall prolapse with and without polypropylene mesh: a prospective, randomized and controlled trial - part i
description Objective To compare the use of polypropylene mesh (PM) and the traditional anterior vaginal wall colporraphy in women with anterior vaginal wall prolapse (AVWP) using objective and subjective tests and evaluation of quality of life (QoL). Materials and Methods One hundred women were randomly distributed in two preoperatory groups. The first group (mesh) (n = 45) received a PM implant and the control group (n = 55) was submitted to traditional colporraphy. Postoperatory follow-up was done after 12 months. The primary objective was the correction of the Ba point ≤ -2 POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System) and the secondary objective was the improvement of vaginal symptoms and QoL through ICIQ-VS (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Vaginal Symptoms). Complications related to the use of PM or not were also described. Results There was a significant difference between all POP-Q measures of pre- and postoperatory periods of each group in particular. There was a significant difference of the Ba point of the postoperatory period between the Mesh and Control group. The mean of Ba point in the Mesh group was statistically lower than of the Control group, depicting the better anatomical result of the first group. Both techniques improved vaginal symptoms and QoL. The most frequent complication of the Mesh group was prepubic hematoma in the perioperative period. In 9.3% of the cases treated with mesh it was observed PM exposition at the anterior vaginal wall after 12 months, being most of them treated clinically. Conclusion The treatment of AVWP significantly improved the Ba point in the Mesh group in comparison to the Control group. There were no differences of the vaginal symptoms and QoL between the two groups after 12 months. There were few and low grade complications on both groups.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publishDate 2013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382013000400519
work_keys_str_mv AT tamaninijosetadeununes treatmentofanteriorvaginalwallprolapsewithandwithoutpolypropylenemeshaprospectiverandomizedandcontrolledtrialparti
AT tamaninimircemilhomemdamota treatmentofanteriorvaginalwallprolapsewithandwithoutpolypropylenemeshaprospectiverandomizedandcontrolledtrialparti
AT castrorenatacristinadeoliveirasouza treatmentofanteriorvaginalwallprolapsewithandwithoutpolypropylenemeshaprospectiverandomizedandcontrolledtrialparti
AT feldnerjrpaulocezar treatmentofanteriorvaginalwallprolapsewithandwithoutpolypropylenemeshaprospectiverandomizedandcontrolledtrialparti
AT castrorodrigodeaquino treatmentofanteriorvaginalwallprolapsewithandwithoutpolypropylenemeshaprospectiverandomizedandcontrolledtrialparti
AT sartorimarairgracioferreira treatmentofanteriorvaginalwallprolapsewithandwithoutpolypropylenemeshaprospectiverandomizedandcontrolledtrialparti
AT giraomanoeljoaobatistacastello treatmentofanteriorvaginalwallprolapsewithandwithoutpolypropylenemeshaprospectiverandomizedandcontrolledtrialparti
_version_ 1756428137604841472