Results of preoperative electrical stimulation of pelvic floor muscles in the continence status following radical retropubic prostatectomy

Purpose To evaluate preoperative rectal electrical stimulation in the recovery of urinary continence in patients who undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy. Materials and Methods Patients were divided into 3 randomized groups: control, pelvic exercises, and electrical stimulation. A 1 hour pad-test, the ICIQ-SF, and the SF-36 were performed 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgical procedure. Results Of the 58 patients who were initially included in the study, 9 were excluded due to radiotherapy after surgical intervention, an indwelling urethral catheter for more than 30 days, high surgical risk, loss of follow-up, or incomplete participation in the study routines and spontaneous interruption. Forty-nine patients concluded the study (15 in the control group, 17 in the exercise group, and 17 in the electrical stimulation group). We did not observe any significant difference in the pad test (p > 0.05), the 8 domains of the SF-36, or ICIQ-SF score compared with control groups (control, exercise, and electrical stimulation). Conclusion Preoperative rectal electrical stimulation has no impact on continence status in patients who undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy. There is no difference in the three above mentioned groups with regard to urinary leakage and quality of life.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laurienzo,Carla Elaine, Sacomani,Carlos Alberto Ricetto, Rodrigues,Telma Ribeiro, Zequi,Stenio de Cassio, Guimaraes,Gustavo Cardoso, Lopes,Ademar
Format: Digital revista
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2013
Online Access:http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382013000200182
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id oai:scielo:S1677-55382013000200182
record_format ojs
spelling oai:scielo:S1677-553820130002001822013-08-22Results of preoperative electrical stimulation of pelvic floor muscles in the continence status following radical retropubic prostatectomyLaurienzo,Carla ElaineSacomani,Carlos Alberto RicettoRodrigues,Telma RibeiroZequi,Stenio de CassioGuimaraes,Gustavo CardosoLopes,Ademar Neoplasms Prostatectomy Urinary Incontinence Pelvic Floor Quality of Life Purpose To evaluate preoperative rectal electrical stimulation in the recovery of urinary continence in patients who undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy. Materials and Methods Patients were divided into 3 randomized groups: control, pelvic exercises, and electrical stimulation. A 1 hour pad-test, the ICIQ-SF, and the SF-36 were performed 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgical procedure. Results Of the 58 patients who were initially included in the study, 9 were excluded due to radiotherapy after surgical intervention, an indwelling urethral catheter for more than 30 days, high surgical risk, loss of follow-up, or incomplete participation in the study routines and spontaneous interruption. Forty-nine patients concluded the study (15 in the control group, 17 in the exercise group, and 17 in the electrical stimulation group). We did not observe any significant difference in the pad test (p > 0.05), the 8 domains of the SF-36, or ICIQ-SF score compared with control groups (control, exercise, and electrical stimulation). Conclusion Preoperative rectal electrical stimulation has no impact on continence status in patients who undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy. There is no difference in the three above mentioned groups with regard to urinary leakage and quality of life. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational braz j urol v.39 n.2 20132013-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articletext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382013000200182en10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.02.05
institution SCIELO
collection OJS
country Brasil
countrycode BR
component Revista
access En linea
databasecode rev-scielo-br
tag revista
region America del Sur
libraryname SciELO
language English
format Digital
author Laurienzo,Carla Elaine
Sacomani,Carlos Alberto Ricetto
Rodrigues,Telma Ribeiro
Zequi,Stenio de Cassio
Guimaraes,Gustavo Cardoso
Lopes,Ademar
spellingShingle Laurienzo,Carla Elaine
Sacomani,Carlos Alberto Ricetto
Rodrigues,Telma Ribeiro
Zequi,Stenio de Cassio
Guimaraes,Gustavo Cardoso
Lopes,Ademar
Results of preoperative electrical stimulation of pelvic floor muscles in the continence status following radical retropubic prostatectomy
author_facet Laurienzo,Carla Elaine
Sacomani,Carlos Alberto Ricetto
Rodrigues,Telma Ribeiro
Zequi,Stenio de Cassio
Guimaraes,Gustavo Cardoso
Lopes,Ademar
author_sort Laurienzo,Carla Elaine
title Results of preoperative electrical stimulation of pelvic floor muscles in the continence status following radical retropubic prostatectomy
title_short Results of preoperative electrical stimulation of pelvic floor muscles in the continence status following radical retropubic prostatectomy
title_full Results of preoperative electrical stimulation of pelvic floor muscles in the continence status following radical retropubic prostatectomy
title_fullStr Results of preoperative electrical stimulation of pelvic floor muscles in the continence status following radical retropubic prostatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Results of preoperative electrical stimulation of pelvic floor muscles in the continence status following radical retropubic prostatectomy
title_sort results of preoperative electrical stimulation of pelvic floor muscles in the continence status following radical retropubic prostatectomy
description Purpose To evaluate preoperative rectal electrical stimulation in the recovery of urinary continence in patients who undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy. Materials and Methods Patients were divided into 3 randomized groups: control, pelvic exercises, and electrical stimulation. A 1 hour pad-test, the ICIQ-SF, and the SF-36 were performed 1, 3, and 6 months after the surgical procedure. Results Of the 58 patients who were initially included in the study, 9 were excluded due to radiotherapy after surgical intervention, an indwelling urethral catheter for more than 30 days, high surgical risk, loss of follow-up, or incomplete participation in the study routines and spontaneous interruption. Forty-nine patients concluded the study (15 in the control group, 17 in the exercise group, and 17 in the electrical stimulation group). We did not observe any significant difference in the pad test (p > 0.05), the 8 domains of the SF-36, or ICIQ-SF score compared with control groups (control, exercise, and electrical stimulation). Conclusion Preoperative rectal electrical stimulation has no impact on continence status in patients who undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy. There is no difference in the three above mentioned groups with regard to urinary leakage and quality of life.
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publishDate 2013
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382013000200182
work_keys_str_mv AT laurienzocarlaelaine resultsofpreoperativeelectricalstimulationofpelvicfloormusclesinthecontinencestatusfollowingradicalretropubicprostatectomy
AT sacomanicarlosalbertoricetto resultsofpreoperativeelectricalstimulationofpelvicfloormusclesinthecontinencestatusfollowingradicalretropubicprostatectomy
AT rodriguestelmaribeiro resultsofpreoperativeelectricalstimulationofpelvicfloormusclesinthecontinencestatusfollowingradicalretropubicprostatectomy
AT zequisteniodecassio resultsofpreoperativeelectricalstimulationofpelvicfloormusclesinthecontinencestatusfollowingradicalretropubicprostatectomy
AT guimaraesgustavocardoso resultsofpreoperativeelectricalstimulationofpelvicfloormusclesinthecontinencestatusfollowingradicalretropubicprostatectomy
AT lopesademar resultsofpreoperativeelectricalstimulationofpelvicfloormusclesinthecontinencestatusfollowingradicalretropubicprostatectomy
_version_ 1756428131044950016